Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tai Lopez
Appearance
- Tai Lopez (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The references seem to point to non-notable sources and interviews. Additionally the article seems to be promotional in tone created by a single purpose account which gives concerns about undisclosed paid editing. A quick Google News search didn't show much more. Drewmutt (^ᴥ^) talk 03:39, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
- I would delete this entry as an unencyclopedic advertisement but the subject and citations establish some notability. FloridaArmy (talk) 03:58, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Babymissfortune 04:28, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Babymissfortune 04:28, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Babymissfortune 04:28, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Babymissfortune 04:28, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
- Keep. The HuffPo, Vice, and Forbes articles on the subject of this article are significant coverage by reliable sources independent of the subject. Thus, this article meets WP:GNG. – by AdA&D at 06:01, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
- No HuffPo or Forbes articles. --Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 10:54, 10 January 2018 (UTC)