Talk:Monkey
Appearance
This article was selected as the article for improvement on 29 July 2013 for a period of one week. |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Monkey article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: Index, 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 3 months |
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
This page was focused on by the Wikipedia spotlight collaboration drive between 00:00, 13 August 2009 and 23:59, 20 August 2009 . (comparison) |
The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:
|
This article was selected as the article for improvement on 8 January 2018 for a period of one week. |
Humans?
Why are there no pictures of humans in this article? By reading the article one could easily get the idea that humans somehow are not monkeys, which is false. In fact it's probably the most common species of monkey there is. Aaker (talk) 19:22, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
Clarification needed
Paragraph 2 says
- Hominoid apes (consisting of gibbons, orangutans, gorillas, chimpanzees, and humans), which all lack tails, are also catarrhines but are not considered monkeys,[citation needed] although often they or their ancestors are (which cladistically automatically implies homonoids are as well).
Part of this can be cut down to
- Hominoid apes ... are not considered monkeys, ... although often they ... are.
Someone familiar with the subject matter might want to split this run-on sentence and also remove the self-contradiction. Thanks in advance. Loraof (talk) 00:01, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
- The sentence could be improved, but it's not a contradiction. It refers to two different sense of the word "monkey". The popular sense, and hence the most common, contrasts "monkeys" with "apes". The cladistic sense, which is less common in popular writing but increasingly common (although not universal) in scientific writing, includes "apes" within "monkeys". Peter coxhead (talk) 06:57, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
monkeys brains and why they are special
the monkeys brain is said to be very unique as in the brain was used as a medicine to cancer and other various medicines. it is said that monkeys have tiny brains and are shifty low lifes that have devoted there lives to find ing out who killed jfk and other ancient people and relics but there main perpose it to kill all humans and eliminate human kind they have a dream like martin luther king to be counted as human and not as dumb monkey that dont understand how to speak any languages and love star wars. my favorite kind of monkey looks like this.↓↓↓↓↓ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.179.161.0 (talk) 21:19, 1 March 2018 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 27 April 2018
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Monkeys are a very lovable creature. AnneKite (talk) 02:10, 27 April 2018 (UTC)
- Not done: Generalization — IVORK Discuss 02:23, 27 April 2018 (UTC)