Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Situational Incompetence

Situational Incompetence

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An essay on a non-notable neologism. The term "situational incompetence" is only used in an IT context in a recent paper by Darryl Carlton. power~enwiki (π, ν) 20:25, 30 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Management-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 02:09, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment, strange that article does not mention the Peter principle. Coolabahapple (talk) 02:13, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect per WP:CHEAP to the Peter principle. They are the exact same thing. Bearian (talk) 01:14, 3 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Merge into Incompetence, which is explicitly needing more material to develop as a broad concept article. The word situational doesn't add much to this because incompetence naturally depends on the situation. The Peter Principle just refers to a particular situation – promotion – and there are many more situations to cover. Andrew D. (talk) 22:26, 3 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 10:30, 7 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 20:30, 14 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect (or maybe Merge?) to Peter principle per User:Bearian -Redditaddict_6_9 02:03, 15 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]