Jump to content

User talk:Volubilis90

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by RoySmith (talk | contribs) at 01:20, 8 August 2019 (Notification: Your Articles for creation submission has been accepted (AFCH 0.9.1)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Volubilis90, you are invited on a Wikipedia Adventure!

The
Adventure
The Wikipedia Adventure guide

Hi Volubilis90!! You're invited: learn how to edit Wikipedia in under an hour. I hope to see you there! Ocaasi

Play The Wikipedia Adventure

This message was delivered by HostBot (talk) 17:20, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Second and Third-Class Facilities on the RMS Titanic

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Olympic-class ocean liner
added links pointing to Edward J. Smith and White Star
First class facilities of the RMS Titanic
added a link pointing to British
Grand Staircase of the RMS Titanic
added a link pointing to ROV
RMS Titanic
added a link pointing to Ritz Hotel

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:51, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Shooting Party, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Edward Fox. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:17, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

First class facilities of the RMS Titanic
added a link pointing to Swimming Pool
Less Than Zero (film)
added a link pointing to Withdrawal

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:46, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

March 2017

Hello. I wanted to let you know that your recent edit(s) to the I Know What You Did Last Summer plot summary have been removed because they added a significant amount of unnecessary detail. Please avoid excessive detail and high word counts when editing plot summaries/synopses. You may read the plot summary edit guides to learn more about contributing constructively to plot summaries/synopses. There are also specific guidelines for films, musicals, television episodes, anime/manga, novels and non-fiction books. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 07:45, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Isla Nublar

It has been accepted. Thank you. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:46, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

First class facilities of the RMS Titanic
added a link pointing to Estée Lauder
Olympic-class ocean liner
added a link pointing to Amerika

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:44, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

April 2017

Information icon Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Isla Sorna, from its old location at User:Volubilis90/sandbox/Isla Sorna. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 01:21, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Isla Sorna (April 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:
This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the general guideline on notability and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Not independently notable outside the fictional universe.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
SwisterTwister talk 02:40, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Louis Seize (April 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheSandDoctor was:
The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at 18th-century French art. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
This appears to have already been covered here 18th-century French art Louis period styles.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
TheSandDoctor (talk) 00:24, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Teahouse logo
Hello! Volubilis90, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! TheSandDoctor (talk) 00:24, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited First class facilities of the RMS Titanic, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Diving board. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:00, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Wreck of the RMS Titanic, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Leaded glass. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:58, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

IMDb and reliable sources

I noticed you expanded the production section of a few film articles. Thank you for doing that, but some of the sources that you're citing are not reliable. The IMDb in particular should not be cited on Wikipedia, as it is user-generated content. WP:FILM/R has an incomplete list of vetted sources that you may find helpful in researching film-related topics. Generally, content should be written by professional journalists or academics, and the source itself should have a professional editorial board. Blogs, fan sites, wikis, databases with user-submitted content, self-published books, etc are examples of sources we can't accept. WikiProject Film is a good place to ask for help if you get stuck, and the reliable sources noticeboard can help resolve questions of whether something is reliable. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 18:42, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Volubilis90. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Interview with the Vampire (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sandy Powell (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 20:38, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Interview with the Vampire (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CGI (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 18:47, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Patsy Stone, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Vogue and Stylist (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:53, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Isla Sorna concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Isla Sorna, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:33, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nicomedia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hellenism (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:27, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Isla Sorna

Hello, Volubilis90. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Isla Sorna".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 10:01, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Louis Seize concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Louis Seize, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:34, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Isla Nublar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rotunda (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:25, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hotel de Paris, Georgetown (March 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.
This submission appears to be taken from https://coloradoencyclopedia.org/article/hotel-de-paris. Wikipedia cannot accept material copied from elsewhere, unless it explicitly and verifiably has been released to the world under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license or into the public domain and is written in an acceptable tone—this includes material that you own the copyright to. You should attribute the content of a draft to outside sources, using citations, but copying and pasting or closely paraphrasing sources is not acceptable. The entire draft should be written using your own words and structure. Note to reviewers: do not leave copyright violations sitting in the page history. Please follow the instructions here.
You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work. EROS message 15:14, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Hotel de Paris (Georgetown, Colorado) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Hotel de Paris (Georgetown, Colorado). Thanks! • Gene93k (talk) 18:37, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Louis Seize

Hello, Volubilis90. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Louis Seize".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 04:01, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hotel de Paris (Georgetown, Colorado) has been accepted

Hotel de Paris (Georgetown, Colorado), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

• Gene93k (talk) 16:58, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Polianthes tuberosa, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cedar (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:00, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited John Paul Getty III, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Pearson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited History of London (1900–39), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Charles Booth (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:41, 19 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Architecture of London, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wimbledon (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Magnolia grandiflora, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page National Arboretum (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:27, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Economic history of the United Kingdom, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Moratorium (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Messalina, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ostia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:24, 30 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Interview with the Vampire (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CGI (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 28 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Volubilis90. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

What a way to spend Christmas!

Hi, Volubilis, I see that, like me, you're hard at work on WP. Seasonal greetings from my grey part of the country.

After all your hard work on the Messalina article in October, I did a bit more background reading myself. I thought you were justified in detailing more of what has been alleged against her, but going into so much detail seemed to upset the balance created between accusation and examination of the evidence. As you'll know from the Talk Page, the article was rewritten in 2013 after User:Cynwolfe (then one of WP's most prominent experts on Roman history) had remarked on the article's previous unreliability and failure to meet WP standards. Although I know it was not your intention, making all those citations from authors whose reliability needs to be questioned, and not coming to the dissentient voice until much later, undid the reason behind the 2013 rewrite. In order to address this problem, I have therefore foregrounded criticism of the original accounts and also slightly abbreviated the lurid stories that follow on the grounds that an encyclopedia is supposed only to summarise and send interested readers back to the sources for more detail. I wanted to explain my thinking to you here but would be happy if you wished to transfer the discussion to the article's talk page. Sweetpool50 (talk) 16:20, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Santa Maria Novella (pharmacy) has been accepted

Santa Maria Novella (pharmacy), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

-- RoySmith (talk) 01:20, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Volubilis90&oldid=909854014"