User talk:Closedmouth
 | This user is lazy and may not respond swiftly to queries. |
| Welcome to my talk page. Please sign and date your entries by inserting ~~~~ at the end. Start a new talk topic. |
| This is Closedmouth's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25Auto-archiving period: 7 days  |
|
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 3 sections are present. |
Today's Wikipedian 10 years ago
 | |
| Ten years! |
|---|
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:52, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
"All in the Family - disambiguation" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect All in the Family - disambiguation. Since you had some involvement with the All in the Family - disambiguation redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. DannyS712 (talk) 06:07, 2 January 2020 (UTC)
User talk:Ryan.W.Gibson
I'm glad you found the user and that the user got a new name and all that, but it doesn't change the fact that their original name was against policy: "Conduit Pharmacy" quite obviously gives "the impression that the account represents a group, organization or website", no matter what the user says in the first person. They weren't blocked for spamming or whatever, but for having a username that doesn't follow policy. Orangemike's block was neither against policy nor unreasonable. If you don't like how that policy is written, propose a change. Drmies (talk) 14:22, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
Winning
The article Winning (film) was recently moved from Winning. As the title is likely to be the only reason it was a vandalism target, could you reduce "Winning (film)"'s protection to at least PC? Thanks. © Tbhotch™ (en-3). 21:28, 5 January 2020 (UTC)