Talk:Hannah Witton

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Biography: Arts and Entertainment C‑class

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Feminism C‑class

	Feminism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Feminism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Feminism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FeminismWikipedia:WikiProject FeminismTemplate:WikiProject FeminismFeminism articles
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Sexology and sexuality C‑class

	Human sexuality portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sexology and sexuality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of human sexuality on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sexology and sexualityWikipedia:WikiProject Sexology and sexualityTemplate:WikiProject Sexology and sexualitySexology and sexuality articles
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Women writers C‑class

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

YouTube C‑class

This article is within the scope of WikiProject YouTube, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of YouTube and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.YouTubeWikipedia:WikiProject YouTubeTemplate:WikiProject YouTubeYouTube articles

C This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject YouTube To-do:

A list of articles needing cleanup associated with this project is available. See also the tool's wiki page and the index of WikiProjects.

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : see list.
Assess : Apply the assessment scale on Unknown-importance YouTube articles + Unassessed YouTube articles
Cleanup : See cleanup listing
Maintain : This WikiProject
Stubs : Category:Stub-Class YouTube articles
Other :
- Substitute {{WikiProject YouTube/Invite Members}} on user talk pages
- Check out edit requests on Talk:List of YouTubers

Why does it mention her height?

Why does the Wikipedia article mention her height? Without a citation, I might add. She's not a basketball player, it doesn't matter. I'm not going to remove it, but it seems inappropriate. Fluoborate (talk) 18:19, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Fluoborate: Remove it if you hate it, I spent my ammo against "weight"/"mass" on Sasha Grey+d:Q2709, and anybody trying "cup size" on (don't say) without a Guardian reference is dead. At least "height" is no moving target, but still requires a solid reference.
Unrelated, this article needs an image, e.g., a cropped frame extracted from the added video. –84.46.52.142 (talk) 08:31, 13 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved

– by direct action after some meep tried to add a "mass" on d:Q2709 again. –84.46.52.63 (talk) 10:23, 28 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

CoI

Personally I hate religious categories; maybe because I'm from Germany: The next step after tagging people could be to "collect" those you don't like. Therefore I agree with this edit, but she explicitly mentioned it as (quote) secular (unquote) in a self-published "assumptions" video yesterday.^[1] –84.46.53.29 (talk) 23:06, 15 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Something else in need of a 2nd opinion, please remove two obscure UK awards imported from dewiki if they are on the wrong side of NN spam. –84.46.52.223 (talk) 02:48, 12 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved

– Got a 2nd opinion by Starklinson et al. –84.46.53.160 (talk) 22:56, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Book(s)

JFTR, Doing It: Let's Talk About Sex now exists and ends up here. When the 2nd book is published please get rid of the WP:TWITTER "announcement", it needs an ISBN and a redirect and (ideally) a review in RS. Or any primary source better than Twitter. –84.46.53.249 (talk) 06:49, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved

– The 4th page in my search hits had a non-seller review, skipping a Chloe Metzger review as WP:UGC. –84.46.52.63 (talk) 14:51, 28 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]