Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by C.Fred (talk | contribs) at 18:48, 9 May 2020 (→Draft:Stirling Highland Games: Accepting request (rfud-helper)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

"WP:RFU" redirects here. For requests to unblock, see Category:Requests for unblock. For requests to unprotect, see Wikipedia:Requests for page protection § Current requests for reduction in protection level.

    This page is NOT for challenging the outcome of deletion discussions or to address the pending deletion of any page.

    Shortcuts

    Requests for undeletion is a process intended to assist users in two cases. The first case is restoring pages or files that were uncontroversially deleted via proposed deletion, under certain speedy deletion criteria (such as maintenance deletions (G6) or stale Articles for creation drafts (G13)), or in deletion debates with little or no participation other than the nominator. In the second use case, this page is also intended to serve as a central location to request that deleted content be "userfied", i.e., restored as a draft or emailed to you; this way, the content can be improved upon prior to re-insertion into the mainspace, or used elsewhere (you may also make a request directly to one of the administrators listed here). Be clear as to which namespace is intended, when requesting a refund of a deleted article.

    This means that content deleted after discussion – through deletion processes – may in some cases be provided to you, but such controversial page deletions will not be overturned through this process but through deletion review instead. Copyright violations and attack pages will not be provided.

    Do not request that pages or media deleted under speedy deletion criteria F7, F9, F11, U5, A7, A9, A11, G3, G4, G10, G11 or G12 be undeleted here.

    Instructions for special cases:

    Enter the page's title:

    Deletion discussions
    Articles
    Templates and modules
    Files
    Categories
    Redirects
    Miscellany
    Speedy deletion
    Proposed deletion


    Category:Marketing research companies by country

    The category "Marketing research companies by country" is still showing up in Google. It should, and it should be there. The "Market"(no "ing") Category is now holding 16 "Marketing" subcategories. The two terms are not identical. Market research and Marketing research each have an article. As of this moment, one is HatNoted yellow, the other orange. —Pi314m (talk) 09:33, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    There's only one deleted revision in the history, and it was a redirect to Category:Market research companies by country, so restoring it isn't going to create separate categories for you. Hut 8.5 10:00, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    That's the one. Perhaps I wasn't clear above: I would like to move Category:Market research companies by country BACK to what it was before the summer, namely Category:Marketing research companies by country.
    Perhaps this might help:
    • A page with this title has previously been moved or deleted.
    • 21:40, 17 August 2019 Fayenatic london (talk | contribs) deleted page
    • Category:Marketing research companies by country (G6: This category is located at Category:Market research companies by country.) (thank)
    18:17, 17 August 2019 JJMC89 bot III (talk  | contribs) moved page
    • Category:Marketing research companies by country to Category:Market research companies by country (Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Speedy) (revert)
    CLICKING revert results in
    • You do not have permission to move this page, for the following reason:
    You do not have permission to move category pages Pi314m (talk) 09:56, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    Ah OK, this is the wrong page for that, this page is for requesting that deleted pages be restored, not that a page should be moved to some other title. I suggest you open a discussion at WP:CFD, which is the place to propose renaming of categories (at least when people disagree). Hut 8.5 10:17, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    Thanks for the suggested re WP:CFD, but JJMC89, one of the above people, didn't like how I carried out your suggestion. He marked it "Misplaced."
    * 20:01, 3 May 2020? JJMC89 . . . (Reverted 1 edit by Pi314m: Misplaced
    * 18:03, 3 May 2020? Pi314m . . . (Referred here by WP:REFUND. subject: Market(ing) ... by country)
    Can you tell me what I did incorrectly, and what to try next. Pi314m (talk) 21:46, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Ricky Bell (singer)

    I, DrewieStewie, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. DrewieStewie (talk) 20:06, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    I haven't had time to work on it lately due to busy real life responsibilities and issues, and nobody ultimately answered my call to work on it in my absence. I might also copy the draft into my sandbox should the request be accepted. DrewieStewie (talk) 20:08, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    • Done – as an Articles for creation (AfC) submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click on the button in the AfC submission template that says Submit your draft for review!. Just finding a few more references will rescue this. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:23, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Issue with above acceptance Graeme Bartlett, the above acceptance of restoration for the draft of Draft: Ricky Bell by Nashanique is vastly different and inferior to the one I was previously working on that was deleted on April 1, which was located at Draft: Ricky Bell (singer) and before its deletion and conversion into a draft page was a standalone article. Could that one be reverted instead please as that was the one I was previously working on? DrewieStewie (talk) 01:36, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    You have been confused by what User:Orangemike did, which was to delete the better draft (which was an incubating atciel), and then redirect it. I have reversed that. I think I will redirect the other way. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 06:49, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    Much better, than you for clarification. :) DrewieStewie (talk) 10:00, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    Thanks, Graeme. The draft is now simply Draft:Ricky Bell, as there was nothing salvageable from the other draft. --Orange Mike | Talk 14:52, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Biotherapeutics, Education & Research Foundation

    I, 98.189.19.28, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 98.189.19.28 (talk) 00:46, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Example

    (This user used the preload form for G13 undeletion, but did not specify the name of the Draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Dhdarren (talk) 05:28, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    BEDASA ABDENA MERERA

    Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —BEDASA ABDENA MERERA (talk) 05:28, 2 May 2020 (UTC) BECAUSE OF USING MISS INFORMATION WHICH IS NOT RELATED TO WIKIPEDIA ARTICLE[reply]

    •  Not done User:BEDASA ABDENA MERERA as it was a copy of a blog, a copyright infringement, and not relevant to Wikipedia. Your user page currently is way too excessive. This here is an encyclopedia, and not about you. You are welcome to contribute to writing articles, as I am sure that coverage of Ethiopia is not good enough here. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:42, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Arthur Leclerc

    Younger brother of the Ferrari Racing driver Charles Leclerc; signed by Ferrari Driver Academy in 2020; can be translated from wiki France —Unnamelessness (talk) 11:21, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:33, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Syed Sultan Shah

    Page was deleted via discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Syed Sultan Shah, I want to work on it in my userspace/sandbox so would like to have access to sources/material that was deleted just to make it easier for me —MistyGraceWhite (talk) 12:51, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Michael Allen

    I, Afreiden, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Afreiden (talk) 14:45, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Helmuth "Kelly" Kainz

    I, ChrisTheDiveGuy, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. ChrisTheDiveGuy (talk) 18:31, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Helmuth "Kelly" Kainz

    I, ChrisTheDiveGuy, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. ChrisTheDiveGuy (talk) 18:45, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]



    I let my editing time expire. Can you reconsider its deletion? I would like to continue to work on it and publish it soon. Thank you

    Chris Kainz — Preceding unsigned comment added by ChrisTheDiveGuy (talk • contribs) 18:48, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Galaxy Nostalgia Network

    (This user used the preload form for G13 undeletion, but did not specify the name of the Draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) 2600:8801:8400:BC4:DC87:4054:17E6:2183 (talk) 19:16, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply] 

    Draft:Galaxy Nostalgia Network

    Angelo Veno

    He is an actor that has played in a movie called THE NUN —2A02:587:B804:BD00:9CE6:529E:B6AD:A03D (talk) 20:15, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Niki Harré

    I believe that the subject is notable and have a good track record writing bios of people like this. I have multiple sources which I don't believe were in the original article. —Stuartyeates (talk) 21:18, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Midnight_Cities

    I, Mrgweder, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Mrgweder (talk) 22:19, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Hello. I absolutely agree that the articles shouldn’t be undeleted I said in my original request, I understand the reversion was needed. Several (although not the majority) of my additions broke the rules, which I was I unaware of. From my original request 

         > Hello! The revised versions of this article were deleted for copyright    violations. This was entirely correct, and I’m legitimately sorry for any trouble which I caused. It was not my intention, and I definitely should have realized my mistake.


    I might be misinformed, I believed this section of Wikipedia is meant for asking for access to articles which you agree were rightfully deleted - but don’t have access to yourself. So you can re-add the information, but properly done, for a second time. I am absolutely not asking for anything to be restored to public access. Like I said in my original request, I absolutely agree these were rightfully removed. I just want to fix them, to improve the article by properly adding the information.


    I can understand the concerns, but I can absolutely guarantee I’m going to revise them properly this time. Like I said, I was just unaware of the copyright rules. It was my mistake, and I want to fix it. It’d be extreme stupid of me to even try to restore any of the copyright protected material, even if I wanted to (which I definitely don’t), knowing that it would literally get caught almost immediately. It’s like accusing someone of trying to steal a secret testing drone from Area 51. Even putting aside the accusation itself, how stupid do you think I am lol? No one could get away with that even if they did want to.

    I can absolutely guarantee everything I add will not break any rules. It’s just, as you can see, I added a lot of stuff. Way too much to remember everything. I will reword everything to follow the protocol, but I need access to the revision to do so. Like I said in my original request 

          > There was a lot of legitimatly good content added to the page in the last month. But sadly they were all lost (even the ones which didn't violate anything), because of the restoration that was needed. I’m 100% willing to add everything again, and this time properly done, with everything reworded. But it makes it impossible to do without being able to actually see the differences.

    I promise I’m a good person. I’m not a criminal :(. I just made a mistake by not knowing the copyright rules when editing the page. And now I want to fix it, but it’s impossible for me to do that without having access to at least Rowz revision. https://i.imgur.com/jh6Xtxv.jpg —BorderRegions (talk) 22:32, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Bail Bloc

    I, Graysonearle, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Graysonearle (talk) 22:36, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    I am not asking for anything to be restored. I am asking for access to the deleted articles for me, personally, so I can fix them. I feel I made that pretty clear in my request, and the fact that this seems so difficult to communicate is legitimately leaving me exasperated :(. It honestly feels like people are only looking at the article name, and not bothering to actually read anything written. I know there were copyright violations. I’m not asking for the versions to be made public.

    I’m asking for access to the pages, for only just me personally, so I can see what updates were made, and fix them. I don’t know if there’s an issue with other people not being allowed to see them. But there were not just three old revisions. If you look at the images I linked below, there were many. Most of them fine. Some were copyright violations. I want to fix the bad ones and update the page again. It is literally 100% impossible for me to add them again, but this optometrist properly, unless you give me access to the page.

    https://imgur.com/AfY6OmN.png https://imgur.com/HsSHgox.png https://imgur.com/J2eAhpL.png https://imgur.com/mjkZy9z.png https://imgur.com/m8rdRCm.png

    > Welcome. Please note that this page is NOT for challenging the outcome of deletion discussions or to address the pending deletion of any page.

    I’m not challenging any deletion here. This was an uncontroversial deletion.

    > Requests for undeletion is a process intended to assist users in restoring pages or files that were uncontroversially deleted via proposed deletion, under certain speedy deletion criteria (such as maintenance deletions (G6) or rejected Articles for creation drafts (G13)), or in deletion debates with little or no participation other than the nominator. This page is also intended to serve as a central location to request that deleted content be userfied, restored as a draft or emailed to you so the content can be improved upon prior to re-insertion into the mainspace, or used elsewhere (you may also make a request directly to one of the administrators listed here).

    The situation here literally applies to this criteria 100% perfectly. So please, I am literally begging you, give me access to the Rodw’s revision lol. I literally can not comprehend why this has been so difficult, given this applies to the criteria listed above perfectly. I made a mistake in an article. That mistake was copyright violations. I didn’t know the rules. It was uncontroversially deleted. Now I know the rules and want to fix it. I need personal access to the old page to fox it. Again, isn’t this literally the entire reason this request page exists? So many I please be allowed to see the Rodw version of the article?

    https://imgur.com/jh6Xtxv.jpg —BorderRegions (talk) 04:46, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    It isn't possible to give you access to deleted revisions. Only administrators can access deleted revisions, and administrators can access all deleted revisions. If you want access to the content then the only options we have are (a) restore the revisions or (b) email you the text of the revisions. (a) is not going to happen, Wikipedia does not restore copyright violations, ever, and certainly not on this page (when you edit this page you should see a notice saying that we don't restore copyright violations here). Copyright violations are also not "uncontroversial deletions", that means things like housekeeping deletions where nobody would object if the page was restored. I am not personally willing to email you the revisions as I've seen a lot of cases where new editors attempt to "fix" copyright violations and end up with something else which is still a copyright violation, but I won't object if another admin is willing to. If you want to fix a copyright violation then you have to rewrite the text from scratch. Incidentally if you want to reply to a comment you can just put a reply on the same thread, there's no need to start another thread for every reply. Hut 8.5 10:43, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    @Hut 8.5: Thank you for the information about the reply. I was confused since I didn’t see any guidelines about responding, so I wanted to say on the safer side by starting a new thread.

    The confusion here was because I believed that “restored” and “undeleted” referred to different things, since the terms are used separately in the disclaimer. I thought “restore” meant “back to public access”, and “undelete” meant “email to user” . I also interpreted “uncontroversially deleted” as “anything that was deleted uncontroversially”, not “deletions that would be uncontroversial to restore”

    I fully understand the hesitation. I understand not just emailing deleted versions to every random user who asks and is mad their revisions got erased. And I don’t know how to prove I’m not one of those people, since there is physically no way to disprove a negative. I’ll say this. If you give me access, and I mess up again, you can deleted my account. I legitimately just want to make the article better, not cause any more problems.

    I want to prove I’m actually committed to making the article better, and not just a random mad poster. I put in legitimately weeks of effort into first improving that article. And now I’ve put in legitimately weeks of effort into trying to get access to the old versions to fix it. What can I do to prove to you I legitimately want to fix my mistakes. I think the fact that I’ve been trying to do this for months now should at least show I’m seriously committed. Would some low-effort angry poster really put this much effort - just into what essentially would be vandalizing the page? By doing something that would get undone in a few minutes, no less. I hope with the amount of dedication I’ve put in, I’ve proven I’m not a troll, but actually just want to improve the page :(. — Preceding unsigned comment added by BorderRegions (talk • contribs) 23:12, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Kandor (comics)

    This article was deleted by PROD in January 2020, then recreated as a redirect. I'm writing a new article, using multiple independent sources that clear notability -- my current draft is at User:Toughpigs/Kandor. I'd like to see the deleted content so that I can merge anything useful into the new article. Thanks! —Toughpigs (talk) 05:08, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    File:The Greatest Showman (Original Motion Picture Soundtrack).png

    I plan to take both the JPEG and PNG versions of the cover art of The Greatest Showman (soundtrack) to FFD. —George Ho (talk) 06:21, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    I'll clarify: I intend to take both the JPEG and PNG versions to FFD, so they'll discuss which version to use. --George Ho (talk) 10:30, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    James Bond: World of Espionage

    Please restore as I intend to add sources I have found. —Jovanmilic97 (talk) 09:02, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    • @Jovanmilic97: the deleted version was one sentence long and just said that it's an upcoming video game about Bond, referenced to [1]. I assume that's out of date now (the article was written in 2015) so it would have to be rewritten anyway. Hut 8.5 10:27, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    I see, thanks. Do not restore then. Regards, Jovanmilic97 (talk) 10:55, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    Not done – Muboshgu (talk) 22:34, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Claude (TV series)

    Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 22:34, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Claude (TV series)

    I, HappyINC, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. HappyINC (💬) 14:38, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Best printers

    I didn't violate anything in my page. I just gave information about Printer and cite by wikipedia references and best knowing site references. Kindly, rollback my page sir. or tell me the corrections which i made mistaken, I will take that things from my page. So, please rollback my page sir." button below —Best Printers (talk) 17:42, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

     Not doneWikipedia is not a place for original research and personal opinion. If you want to publish something like that, set up your own website. --Orange Mike | Talk 21:41, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:The Eyeball It Theorem

    This was deleted by G11 (patent nonsense). However, Google tells me this is an actual theorem. —Taku (talk) 04:14, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion G1. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, DGG (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. — JJMC89 (T·C) 04:27, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    JJMC89, TakuyaMurata There is indeed a theorem by the name of Eyeballl Theorem, the name presumably derived from the appearance of the diagram: --see mathoverflow [2] It's even in wikibooks, [3], but without a diagram. . However, that's not what the draft article described. The entire text of the article was The Eyeball It Theorem is a nice simple theorem for geometry. The theorem is something along the lines of, "If the figure looks like the other figure then they are congruent." This is important because it makes life so much easier. There was, needless to say, no reference & no diagram. I took it as a joke, not just an incompetent description. There's no reason someone-- like Taku-- couldn't write a real article on the real theorem. DGG ( talk ) 05:14, 4 May 2020 (UTC) DGG ( talk ) 05:15, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    @DGG: Ok. I understand. I didn’t know the content of the draft; I knew only the article title (as I don’t have access to the content). My argument was thus for the article title (and I will try to recreate the draft with the new content). —- Taku (talk) 13:16, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Prism3D

    Article deleted in 2008 because of WP:N issue, but after the huge success of Euro Truck Simulator 2 (in 2012) and American Truck Simulator (in 2016), I believe the game engine is notable. Plus, it can be translated from Russian Wikipedia. —Unnamelessness (talk) 11:55, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Userfied – the page has been restored to the userspace at Draft:Prism3D. – Muboshgu (talk) 21:18, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    Unnamelessness, given that the article was deleted almost 12 years ago, and is not at all in mainspace quality at this point even beyond being outdated, I put it in draft space and you can work on it there. – Muboshgu (talk) 21:19, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    Thank you, Muboshgu. Unnamelessness (talk) 03:57, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Kevin Rudd (Rugby League, born 1971)

    I, Oakbark, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Oakbark (talk) 12:14, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


    I'd like to start editing this page again please and then click the "Publish changes" button below —Oakbark (talk) 12:16, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as an Articles for creation (AfC) submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click on the button in the AfC submission template that says Submit your draft for review!. – Muboshgu (talk) 21:17, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    disdaphnee

    So my page was created so that i can be verified on my social media platforms. You need at least one article about yourself so that people know about you. I meet those requirements. So I would love to have my page un-deleted. I, Daphnee, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Daphhnee (talk) —Disdaphnee (talk) 15:15, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

     Not done Certainly not! As you have already been told, Wikipedia is not a soapbox or means of promotion. Moreover, writing an article about yourself is also strongly discouraged per Wikipedia's guidelines regarding conflict of interest. Please note that if you continue to add promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. --Orange Mike | Talk 16:31, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Urwahmansoor/Sandbox

    I has published a page that I was writing on behalf of an online company. I am not aware with the policies of Wikipedia in detail and so I am unable to comprehend exactly why the page was deleted. Could you please provide me with a briefing as to why this page did not meet the standards of Wikipedia. —Urwahmansoor (talk) 16:21, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

     Not done You were writing on behalf of a company, but did not make the mandatory disclosure of your status as a paid editor. In addition, the deleted content was a blatant advertisement, and could never be used as the basis for an article, even by someone without your obvious conflict of interest. --Orange Mike | Talk 16:27, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    File:Ironmonger 2008film.jpg

    This was tagged as part of The Squirrel Conspiracy removing improperly tagged NFC. However, this image was used at Iron Man (2008 film) where I believe it was a valid use of a non-free image (opposed to also on the Iron Monger article where it was not), and thus, I am requesting it be restored to feature once again on the Iron Man film article. I also was unclear if this was the correct place or the deletion review, hence requesting here. —Favre1fan93 (talk) 21:07, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    I'm not opposed to this, as in the article Iron Man (2008 film) there's a good deal of prose about the construction of the suit in the section where the image was. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 23:04, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    @The Squirrel Conspiracy: Thanks. I assumed the reason for deletion was the use at Iron Monger, and I just assumed you were not aware of its use at Iron Man (2008 film). - Favre1fan93 (talk) 00:00, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
     Not done Since it was deleted at FFD, you'll need to duscuss it with Jo-Jo Eumerus. — JJMC89 (T·C) 06:46, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    User:KhosraviSaeed/sandbox

    I, KhosraviSaeed, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. KhosraviSaeed (talk) 01:15, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Central Asian-American Enterprise Fund

    I, Stevenmitchell, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Stevenmitchell (talk) 02:09, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    File:Otto Fönnekold.jpg

    File was deleted as F5 "Unused non-free media file" when article Otto Fönnekold was redirected, now restored and expanded so would be good to get image restored as well. Cheers —MisterBee1966 (talk) 04:14, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Aly Vance

    I, 2A02:C7D:3B87:5B00:4E3:212D:2E29:AE75, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 2A02:C7D:3B87:5B00:4E3:212D:2E29:AE75 (talk) 12:06, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    File:PeeingBoy.JPG

    File was moved to Commons (as File:Peeing_Boy_Iya_Valley.JPG) a few years ago, however it is not likely to be free in source country (Japan) for an indeterminate time, due to Japan's lack of Freedom of Panorama for statues. Please restore with {{Do not move to Commons|reason=US only}}. —Storkk (talk) 12:51, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

     Not done The US doesn't have FoP for statues either. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 12:52, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    D'oh. Brain fart on my part. Apologies. Storkk (talk) 12:54, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    File:Para SF personnel at Kashmir.jpg

    I believe that from the site I had collected from the image is free for use. As well I had provided viewers the actual Author of the Picture and the source from where I had collected that image —Swastik Mridha (talk) 13:44, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

     Not done The file hasn't been deleted (yet). But when it is (as it clearly comes from the Hindustani Times), knowing either the source or the author is insufficient: it has to have been explicitly released under a creative commons licence, thereby eschewing the copyright of the holder. SERIAL# 13:57, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Cary_Lawrence

    Still an active actor. IMDb shows new information. —136.28.167.224 (talk) 15:16, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request. – Muboshgu (talk) 15:20, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:My Financial Coach

    I, AndrewJoelCrosby, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. AndrewJoelCrosby (talk) 17:15, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


    The article for this business was still being worked on, however, now knowing the timelines for something to remain in draft mode, I will make sure it is completed well ahead of it being subject to deletion. —AndrewJoelCrosby (talk) 17:18, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as a draft that was deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. However, the draft namespace, though it is intended to provide some breathing room to create and develop a page without the time pressure of immediate review, is not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the article mainspace. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion and then submit it for review—at the least, prior to another six months elapsing. When you are ready, a review can be requested by placing this code at the top of the page and then saving: {{subst:submit}}. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:39, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    File:Marvel Animation Logo.jpg

    Logo is too simple for non-free. Please undelete previous versions.

    Also:

    Regards, —Jonteemil (talk) 18:04, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    ​ Done. I've split File:AndCards logotype.svg into File:AndCards logotype 1.svg, File:AndCards logotype 2.svg, File:AndCards logotype 3.svg, and File:AndCards logotype 4.svg. Please evaluate each. — JJMC89 (T·C) 20:26, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    @JJMC89: Thanks! I think there are is another version to the Marvel logo still deleted though.Jonteemil (talk) 20:31, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    It was at File:Marvel.jpg. — JJMC89 (T·C) 20:38, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    @JJMC89: Yeah, I know. When you move a file the log for some reason gets split. I think it would be better if it were copied, that is, every logged action before the move gets copied to the the log of the new file. That's how "View history" works, but for some reason not for logs.Jonteemil (talk) 20:49, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    File:Dail court image 2.jpg

    Old revisions were revdelled because the file was marked as unfree, but the image is in fact in the public domain. Please un-delete the old/original versions for proper attribution so the file can be moved to Commons. Thanks, —Mdaniels5757 (talk) 18:37, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

     Done — JJMC89 (T·C) 20:16, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Angela Lorenz

    I, FloridaArmy, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. FloridaArmy (talk) 22:55, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 23:48, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Please Undelete Robin Bernheim Article

    Robin Bernheim is a prominent television writer/producer with credits that include episodes of STAR TREK VOYAGER, QUANTUM LEAP and REMINGTON STEELE. In fact, one of her STAR TREK VOYAGER episodes was spotlighted two weeks ago by the HOLLYWOOD REPORTER as a modern classic (https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/heat-vision/forgotten-star-trek-voyager-episode-worth-revisiting-1290700) and her movie PRINCESS SWITCH is one of the highest rated in Netflix history. She surely is prominent enough to deserve a Wikipedia listing and I can't understand why her page was deleted. —Nickstryker (talk) 05:16, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request. If you see what little was written, you may understand how it came to be deleted. Please add more referenced info, I added STAR TREK VOYAGER for you. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 06:46, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    Courtesy ping for @Cardiffbear88 -FASTILY 07:54, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    Thanks for the ping. Nickstryker I still don’t believe this article is notable, please can you help by adding reliable sources where you can (WP:RS). The article may be nominated for deletion again by another editor if it is not improved. Thanks. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 08:35, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:KDnuggets

    I, Mtdearing, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Matthew T. Dearing (talk) 11:37, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Body Break to be reinstated as standalone page

    Hal and Joanne (Body Break) are completely unaffiliated with ParticipACTION and haven't been affiliated with them since apprx 1991[1] Moreover, because Body Break (standalone, without ParticipACTION) commercials continue to air[2] keeping the Body Break section within ParticipACTION will cause confusion for readers and misrepresents the current relationship between ParticipACTION and Body Break —Miguelito83 (talk) 14:07, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    References

    1. ^ https://www.bodybreak.com/about/bb-story/
    2. ^ https://bc.ctvnews.ca/the-body-break-duo-just-released-a-new-segment-on-physical-distancing-1.4874455
    Not done There is nothing to undelete. The edit history remains, as these revisions don't get deleted in a page merge. If you want to split the article back out, I suggest obtaining consensus on the talk page. – Muboshgu (talk) 16:19, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Joey_Primiani

    I, 2601:647:4001:7980:3938:6E67:93D2:852B, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 2601:647:4001:7980:3938:6E67:93D2:852B (talk) 15:02, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 16:20, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    File:Charge! network logo.png

    Request undeletion of old revisions because the file is free and ready to be moved to Commons, but history should be intact. Thanks, —Mdaniels5757 (talk) 15:02, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    File:Agilelogo.png

    Request undeletion of old revisions because the file is free and ready to be moved to Commons, but history should be intact. Thanks, —Mdaniels5757 (talk) 15:03, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Christopher Gordon Richardson

    Looking to add additional content, update references and cross reference band page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Q-Feel —Jamiet147 (talk) 16:15, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 16:20, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Kasia Urbaniak

    The page was deleted as it was created from a blocked account. I want to work on it and improve it please. —Ambrożyk (talk) 16:29, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

     Not done Under those circumstances, it's best to start fresh, so that there are no copyright questions and we don't give any encouragement to the blocked account holder. --Orange Mike | Talk 16:51, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    ?

    (This user used the preload form for G13 undeletion, but did not specify the name of the Draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) 2409:4055:412:E1A9:C0CA:A9F3:2E01:C51 (talk) 16:55, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Ameil J. Joseph

    Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —Ameilj (talk) 19:07, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    This was deleted erroneously. There was no copyright infringement nor payment to anyone for the page.

    @Muboshgu: That's the number of the OTRS ticket in which the subject of the biography states that he authored the content himself (and therefore the page creator, who is a different person, is committing a copyright violation by uploading another person's text as their own). Yunshui 雲水 07:15, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    Yunshui, thanks for that clarification. Not done. – Muboshgu (talk) 15:38, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Animation_Throwdown:_The_Quest_For_Cards

    I'm a relatively inexperienced Wikipedia user, but last year I put significant work into cleaning up and expanding a stub article I found on this game, successfully addressing several questions and criticisms that came up along the way.

    Today I logged into Wikipedia to edit a completely unrelated page and found a notice that two images I had uploaded for the game were subject for deletion , and when I went to look at the page, it was deleted 3 days ago with no notice to me.

    Animation_Throwdown:_The_Quest_For_Cards

    23:50, 3 May 2020 Explicit (talk contribs) deleted page Animation Throwdown: The Quest For Cards (Expired PROD, concern was: Entirely sourced to primary sources, including forums. Search on theWikiProject:Video Games/Search Engine finds very little in the way of reliable coverage - only a short review on TouchArcade and a pre-release promo spot on VentureBeat. It's not sufficient to retain an article under WP:N, which requires topics to have "gained sufficiently significant attention by the world at large and over a period of time".)

    I thought we were supposed to link to primary sources!

    There are a half dozen external reviews and strategy guides (written in different years) I found with a cursory web search that I can link to when the page is restored.

    I went to Explicit's talk page but it says they are busy and "Please consider using other venues such as WP:REFUND, where most of my deletions are considered uncontroversial and can be restored upon request."

    The criteria mentioned on that page are complicated and it didn't sound like my request would qualify. If it's really as simple as requesting an undelete, that's not at all clear. (This is all really unsettling and off-putting for an inexperienced user.)

    Done – as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request.
    Aliza250, secondary sources are needed to demonstrate the topic meets the general notability guideline. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:49, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Thanks, I'll work on getting more secondary references linked. --Aliza250 (talk) 20:52, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Wrea Head Hall

    Please see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wrea Head Hall. I will confess to being seriously confused by 5 Keeps vs 2 Deletes resulted in a delete. GhostInTheMachine (talk) 20:43, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    • Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wrea Head Hall, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, Spartaz (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. – Muboshgu (talk) 21:21, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    File:Susan Kissimon.jpg

    Permission for this image has been included in VRTS ticket # 2020050210000163. — ~~ Alex Noble/1-2/TRB 21:10, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Tamale Mirundi

    Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —41.210.143.195 (talk) 21:12, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Not done There is no history at Tamale Mirundi or Draft:Tamale Mirundi – Muboshgu (talk) 21:27, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:EUDEMONIZAM==

    (This user used the preload form for G13 undeletion, but did not specify the name of the Draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Dragan988 (talk) 21:14, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Clanak je obrisan jer je proteklo vise od sest meseci od poslednjeg uredjivanja istog, pri ponovnom pristupanju potrebno mi je sve od obrisanih clanaka da bi mogao da nastavim sa uredjivanjem istih.

    Draft:Mega Man (film)

    I, Trailblazer101, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Trailblazer101 (talk) 00:57, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as a draft that was deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. However, the draft namespace, though it is intended to provide some breathing room to create and develop a page without the time pressure of immediate review, is not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the article mainspace. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion and then submit it for review—at the least, prior to another six months elapsing. When you are ready, a review can be requested by placing this code at the top of the page and then saving: {{subst:submit}}. – Muboshgu (talk) 02:06, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Drew Chicone

    Drew is very well known in the (small) circle of saltwater fly tying & fishing, an educator and been featured in a number of articles, videos along with having authored quite a few books on the topic. —Mlepisto (talk) 04:00, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Kaushlendra Jha

    Last day I read the article about Kaushlendra Jha and followed all the citations for just a curiosity, all the citations are from India's top News websites also the first citation is from BBC which one of the best international news website..as I believe due to some personal issues someone creates the request for deletion and as per my knowledge Wikipedia allows different language sources in English article and all the citation are in Hindi language and because the administrator who deleted this page does not know the Hindi language so she/he convinced with the appeal of a random user who requested for deletion. I just believe if that type of random request considered, for just personal reasons many articles might be deleted. I just suggest you handover this article to someone who understands both English as well as Hindi. —117.254.142.132 (talk) 07:01, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:VALR

    I, 123marathon, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 123marathon (talk) 08:29, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Bopodi

    I was looking for citations of Bopodi, it took too much time.So, I have some references to Bopodi and I wish to work on it. and then click the "Publish changes" button below —Kapitan Siddharth (talk) 10:15, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Uniform Map

    G13; there might not be many English sources but this is somehow notable website in Taiwan. —Taku (talk) 13:13, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 15:36, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Lowercase Noises

    I, Supahdario, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Supahdario (talk) 13:35, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


    Started this page by myself a long time ago, but would like to involve other people so that they can continue and finish my work. —Supahdario (talk) 13:37, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 15:37, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Bob Clendenin

    The actor is notable: he has over 100 credits, recurred on Scrubs, and played major character on Cougar town. The result was soft delete due to no comments[1], so I request the article for undeletion.

    1. ^ Bob Clendenin

    —Кирилл С1 (talk) 16:26, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Done AfD with no participation, soft deleted. – Muboshgu (talk) 16:31, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Talaquega Park

    I, Adambaileyyy, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Adambaileyyy (talk) 20:43, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soroush_Saghafian

    I am working to update the article to meet the academic notability guidelines and need more time to edit —Bela1977 (talk) 20:46, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Talaquega Park

    I started making the page but realized I didn't have a lot of the information necessary to give a detailed description of the area/property. It took me a while to gain access to the information and the site was deleted because of a lack of material. I have since added material to the page. I want people of Attleboro, Massachusetts to be able to enjoy the information about the old historical area of the Talaquega Park Casino. —Adambaileyyy (talk) 20:49, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    • Done There were two edits that had been deleted and I have restored them. One was by you, and the other was requesting deletion. You can find those edits in the history tab. – Muboshgu (talk) 21:00, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Steven Samuel Devassy

    Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —Shyamalsainath (talk) 21:23, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Not done – this page is a copyright violation.
    Additionally, the text in the article was unacceptably promotional. —C.Fred (talk) 21:41, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Lil Buddha

    I, Coolboi567, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Prashant Shahi 21:24, 7 May 2020 (UTC)

    Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 21:40, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:SU-85B

    I, PrussianOwl, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. PrussianOwl (talk) 03:37, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:John Wagner (Professional Baseball Coach)

    The article was originally deleted because the reason for the rejection of its publication could not be rectified within a reasonable period. The reason for its rejection was the lack of certain references requested by the librarian who reviewed the article. Finally, I was able to get those references to support a fragment of the article and I consider that its content can be approved with the incorporation of these new references. —Juanma281984 (talk) 05:38, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Wrea Head Hall

    Please provide deleted article to draft space, i.e. Draft:Wrea Head Hall to facilitate active ongoing discussion after AFD was closed delete. Closing editor User:Spartaz has not replied to request for a copy, at User talk:Spartaz#AFD on Wrea Head Hall. Probably a deletion review will be requested by its normal processes, soon, but need the article first. Thanks! —Doncram (talk) 07:05, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    There's already a denied undeletion request above this one from only several hours ago. — MarkH21talk 07:56, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Filmirage

    I, Flickyard, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Flickyard (talk) 09:06, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    • @Flickyard: this was previously restored twice for you, but there was no effort to edit. What are you planning for the draft? Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:24, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
      • @Graeme Bartlett: I am still collecting sources. The company was very influential for Italian co-produced genre film in the 1980s and early 1990s, yet it is hard to find good sources on it. One has to collect information from bits and scraps. I am planning to do that this summer.

    Draft:Bertille de Baudinière

    I, FloridaArmy, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. FloridaArmy (talk) 10:50, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:OtakuKart

    (This user used the preload form for G13 undeletion, but did not specify the name of the Draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Sohel Moldharia 12:29, 8 May 2020 (UTC)

    Done – as an Articles for creation (AfC) submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click on the button in the AfC submission template that says Submit your draft for review!. – Muboshgu (talk) 15:53, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Dommytommy12

    New User Just Joined Wikipedia Today. —Martian-2008 (talk) 14:53, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Martian-2008, their page was deleted by G7, in other words, their request. I do not understand why you created a user page for them.
    Dommytommy12, welcome to Wikipedia. Let me know if you want me to delete this user page or if you want me to restore your edits. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:28, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Hard Luck Love Song

    (This user used the preload form for G13 undeletion, but did not specify the name of the Draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) 2606:A000:140A:89F4:15B1:5308:295:DDC3 (talk) 16:22, 8 May 2020 (UTC) = English —– Muboshgu (talk) 18:30, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:30, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Ashu Khanna

    The page is a account of Ashu Khannas life written by me. She is a motivational speaker and a leadership coach. She has trained many leaders in India and has had a very positive impact on their professional career. Wikipedia is a source of gaining info and acts like a true encyclopedia. I feel that Ashu Khannas info shall be sought by many ppl and hence the page should not be deleted. If there is some change in content that needs to be done then pls do let me know. —Pundalik Baliga (talk) 18:22, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Not done – this page was deleted as a blatant advertisement under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion and Wikipedia is not to be used as a vehicle for promotion. This does not necessarily mean a suitable article on this topic cannot be created. If it is a notable topic, e.g., multiple reliable, secondary, published sources that are entirely independent of the subject have written about it in substantive detail (not just mere mentions), then a neutrally written article may be possible. This one was written like a commercial. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:27, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Kenneth_Reitz

    I, TZubiri, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. TZubiri (talk) 19:02, 8 May 2020 (UTC) The page was deleted due to lack of notability. I recently found the person is the author of a published book by ISBN 978-1491933176, I'll add that reference and publish the page directly. Thank you!--TZubiri (talk) 19:03, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    SoftEasy Software, Inc.

    I, Lonabaugh, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Lonabaugh (talk) 19:17, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


    I never had a chance to finish this up and want to work on it now —Lonabaugh (talk) 19:19, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Mária Bozóky

    I, Ivanffy-Uhler Gallery, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Ivanffy-Uhler Gallery (talk) 21:19, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    • Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Note that your user name appears to represent an organisation. It is a violation for an organisation to own a user here, instead they must represent individual people. You should change your user name. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:51, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Rachel Crooks

    I, 2607:F2C0:ECAA:C5:1C6E:6E62:4FEC:C58B, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 2607:F2C0:ECAA:C5:1C6E:6E62:4FEC:C58B (talk) 00:32, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply] 

    Rachel Crooks is an American public figure who has run for public office — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2607:F2C0:ECAA:C5:1C6E:6E62:4FEC:C58B (talk) 00:34, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Ranjani Ramachandran

    I intend to continue working on the page. However, the last editor who marked it for deletion never responded to my request asking why he said it was too closely linked to the article's subject. As I pointed out to him, there were references to two well-known national newspapers in India as well as to other third-party links. —Psurajit (talk) 05:54, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    • Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Hut 8.5 08:44, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    • Noting (because Psaurajit has raised my non-response) If the refund requesting editor had bothered to read User_talk:Hasteur/Editnotice when making their plea, they would have read If you're coming here to complain about an action I've taken (such as declining your Articles for Creation submission) please read the reasoning carefully. I try to leave enough information for editors to be able to correct the issue on their own. I will not be responding to any pleas for review here. I've reviewed thousands of AFC submissions and don't have the time to provide every inquiry information that is already provided in the decline message (such as the submission needs to pass WP:NMUSIC) or to bump the thousands of other submissions that have already been waiting over 2 months for review. CC @Hut 8.5: Hasteur (talk) 18:30, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Tricolore pasta

    I, Mcfluffy1234, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Mcfluffy1234 (talk) 12:40, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Not done
    @Mcfluffy1234: I don't see either that page or Draft:Tricolore pasta in the logs. —C.Fred (talk) 18:46, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Talk:Tzotzil (disambiguation)/Mummers/Tzotzil

    Talk:Tzotzil/Mummers/Tzotzil was apparently mistaken for a subpage, moved to Talk:Tzotzil (disambiguation)/Mummers/Tzotzil and then deleted, with the talk page independently re-created again the following year. Could the old revisions be restored and hist-merged back into Talk:Tzotzil/Mummers/Tzotzil? – Uanfala (talk) 13:55, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Stirling Highland Games

    There is more related information now on the subject which can be added —Wolfeditor (talk) 14:34, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. —C.Fred (talk) 18:48, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion&oldid=955774295"