User talk:Phineas suratt

October 2019

Hello, I'm Eagles247. An edit that you recently made to Matt Hasselbeck seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want to practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Eagles 24/7 (C) 22:29, 17 October 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Thomas L. Phillips (November 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by HitroMilanese was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Thomas L. Phillips and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Thomas L. Phillips, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hitro talk 06:56, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Hello, Phineas suratt! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Hitro talk 06:56, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (November 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by HitroMilanese was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Phineas suratt/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Phineas suratt/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hitro talk 06:57, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Thomas L. Phillips

Hi, your recently-created article Thomas L. Phillips has a number of issues:

1. It has no sources (tag has been added).
2. It appears to replicate the content of an external source with close paraphrasing (tag has been added).
3. The copyright of the image you had included is unclear: it is tagged on Commons as your 'own work', yet it is clearly a photograph of a painting, and unless you are the artist who painted it (?), or can demonstrate an appropriate license, the image is probably a copyright violation and should be removed; see here. I have commented out the image for now, awaiting your comments.

Thanks, --DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:05, 29 November 2020 (UTC)