User contributions for DbivansMCMLXXXVI

2 February 2019

• 22:3822:38, 2 February 2019 diff hist +104 Supercruise →Advantages: moving to make other sections make more sense in context to one another.
• 22:3422:34, 2 February 2019 diff hist +94 Supercruise →Advantages: adding reference
• 22:3322:33, 2 February 2019 diff hist +856 Supercruise →Advantages: adding information on limitations of certain engines and why they cannot be used safely for supercruise.
• 22:1622:16, 2 February 2019 diff hist +102 Talk:Panavia Tornado →Confused additions: fixing indentation and adding more
• 22:1422:14, 2 February 2019 diff hist −1 Talk:Panavia Tornado Removing mistaken extra indentation
• 22:1322:13, 2 February 2019 diff hist +678 Talk:Panavia Tornado →Confused additions: adding response
• 22:0822:08, 2 February 2019 diff hist +593 Supercruise →Military use: Adding information about the Tornado and supercruise.
• 21:3921:39, 2 February 2019 diff hist −80 Supercruise →Advantages: clarifying sentence after request for clarification
• 21:3421:34, 2 February 2019 diff hist +29 Panavia Tornado →Prototypes and testing: clarifying that the danger was not while supercruising, but decelerating from it. It could reach supercruise safely, but not leave it.
• 21:3021:30, 2 February 2019 diff hist +2 Panavia Tornado →Prototypes and testing: separating new information into new paragraph.
• 21:2721:27, 2 February 2019 diff hist +209 Talk:Panavia Tornado →Confused additions: adding to my previous post
• 21:2421:24, 2 February 2019 diff hist +426 Talk:Panavia Tornado →Confused additions
• 21:1721:17, 2 February 2019 diff hist +510 Talk:Panavia Tornado →Confused additions
• 21:1421:14, 2 February 2019 diff hist +1,213 Panavia Tornado →Prototypes and testing: adding additional information about the intake and engine issues from one of the lead engineers on the Tornado turbine controls. Reference included.
• 11:4311:43, 2 February 2019 diff hist +782 Talk:Panavia Tornado →Confused additions
• 11:3911:39, 2 February 2019 diff hist +906 Talk:Panavia Tornado →Confused additions: adding response

1 February 2019

• 17:3717:37, 1 February 2019 diff hist −10 Concorde Removing the word "passenger". Most Tu-144 flights were cargo, due to the known safety defects.
• 17:3117:31, 1 February 2019 diff hist +791 Talk:Panavia Tornado →Confused additions: adding response
• 17:0817:08, 1 February 2019 diff hist −381 Concorde Undid revision 881216396 by GliderMaven (talk) Previous version was not better. THE REFERENCE DOES NOT INCLUDE THE CLAIM BEING MADE. It is also clearly untrue when looking at the specifications. Tag: Undo
• 17:0517:05, 1 February 2019 diff hist +247 Talk:Panavia Tornado →Confused additions: adding response
• 17:0417:04, 1 February 2019 diff hist −2 Talk:Panavia Tornado →Confused additions
• 17:0417:04, 1 February 2019 diff hist +900 Talk:Panavia Tornado →Confused additions: adding response
• 01:5901:59, 1 February 2019 diff hist +182 Concorde →Tu-144: clarifying the likely reason for poor range and why the concorde was different.
• 01:5701:57, 1 February 2019 diff hist −563 Concorde →Tu-144: Removing claim. Reference makes no mention of this anywhere, and it does not match the technical specifications anyways.
• 01:4301:43, 1 February 2019 diff hist +337 Talk:Supercruise →MiG-25: adding comment
• 01:3501:35, 1 February 2019 diff hist +849 User talk:McSly →Avoid warning people if you have not read the issue you are warning someone about.: new section
• 01:2801:28, 1 February 2019 diff hist +286 Apple II (original) →Third-party devices and applications: Added information on reverse engineered Soviet hardware and linked to seperate wikipedia page. Also added Russian reference.
• 01:1401:14, 1 February 2019 diff hist −151 Panavia Tornado →Prototypes and testing: Separating sentence about espionage and adding more information and references. Removing dead reference and adding more reliable reference.
• 01:0301:03, 1 February 2019 diff hist +148 Panavia Tornado Adding additional information, clarifying who was involved, and why the problem existed. Combined into one paragraph because some members dont understand different paragraphs can be from the same reference.
• 00:2300:23, 1 February 2019 diff hist +136 Chengdu J-10 →Propulsion: adding information about new intake design. Already cited in section about model types.
• 00:1500:15, 1 February 2019 diff hist +30 Chengdu J-10 →Specifications (J-10A): changing image caption to point out a major design change visible on the aircraft in question
• 00:1200:12, 1 February 2019 diff hist +432 Talk:Concorde →Can we please clean up the summary: new section

31 January 2019

• 23:5223:52, 31 January 2019 diff hist +2,316 User talk:Fnlayson →Stop editing articles you have clearly not read: new section
• 23:4623:46, 31 January 2019 diff hist −35 Panavia Tornado Undid revision 881184676 by Fnlayson (talk) The reference is already provided. It is only a single subject and not several different subjects. If you attempt to go around the 3 revert rule again you will be reported. Tag: Undo
• 23:3323:33, 31 January 2019 diff hist −17 Panavia Tornado Undid revision 881183391 by Nigel Ish (talk) IS ALREADY CITED AT THE END. The paragraphs tell a single story from a single reference. You clearly have not even read it. Tag: Undo
• 23:2923:29, 31 January 2019 diff hist +2,381 User talk:Nigel Ish →Please avoid making edits or claims if you have clearly not read the changes.: new section
• 23:2123:21, 31 January 2019 diff hist −569 Panavia Tornado →Prototypes and testing: Clarifying the issues with the intake design. REFERENCE IS ALREADY CITED.
• 22:4522:45, 31 January 2019 diff hist +2,137 Panavia Tornado Undid revision 881174170 by Nigel Ish (talk) The changes are perfectly comprehensible to everyone else. Consider reading it completely instead of making rude comments Tag: Undo
• 21:3821:38, 31 January 2019 diff hist +2,137 Panavia Tornado →Prototypes and testing: Adding information about the failure of the design of the intake, and resulting legal threats that resulted from misunderstanding.
• 21:0121:01, 31 January 2019 diff hist +895 Supercruise →Advantages: Noting differences in design that may be easy to confuse but serve different purposes
• 19:5619:56, 31 January 2019 diff hist +43 Supercruise →Advantages: clarifying explanation before going into technical information
• 19:5119:51, 31 January 2019 diff hist +1,739 Supercruise →Advantages: Explaining design advantages and disadvantages including example
• 19:4919:49, 31 January 2019 diff hist −854 Overall pressure ratio →Examples: Removing unsourced complaint from the article. This belongs in the talk section. And it is disproven by the reference sourced already.

30 January 2019

• 03:2003:20, 30 January 2019 diff hist +1,319 Supercruise →Aircraft designed to cruise on afterburner: Clarifying the reasons for its performance and limitations, as well as exceeding these limitations.

23 January 2019

• 14:0114:01, 23 January 2019 diff hist +972 Condensing steam locomotive →Thermodynamics: clarifying limitations and including information users may not be familiar with if they are new to the subject

21 January 2019

• 08:4108:41, 21 January 2019 diff hist −5 Convair B-58 Hustler Undid revision 879301191 by Dondervogel 2 (talk) Standard practice is to use a superscript on square areas, not an abbreviation. Tag: Undo

29 December 2018

• 06:0006:00, 29 December 2018 diff hist +433 Mikoyan-Gurevich MiG-25 →Technical description: Clarifying the fuel consumption issues

28 December 2018

• 11:0611:06, 28 December 2018 diff hist +498 Pulsejet →Types: clarifying how the devices air intakes operate.

26 December 2018

• 23:2923:29, 26 December 2018 diff hist +755 Talk:Supercruise →MiG 25
• 23:2223:22, 26 December 2018 diff hist +367 Talk:Supercruise →F-16N