User talk:Gardenkur
Suggest
Religion and Spirituality articles
List of all categories
List of all Categories: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Contents/Categories
List of Articles without Category: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Categories/uncategorized
Links
About this edit: Thanks! Also, in Wikipedia's jargon, we call those "links" rather than "citations". Happy editing, WhatamIdoing (talk) 19:37, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
Editing Experience
Hi, how is your editing experience so far.LoveAll (talk). 10:59, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
The Original Barnstar |
| This is a message of appreciation. LoveAll (talk). 11:02, 18 December 2020 (UTC) |
A barnstar for you!
|
|
The Original Barnstar |
| You r doing fine. LoveAll (talk). 10:44, 20 December 2020 (UTC) |
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:48, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
On sources, and reusing refs
Hi, thanks for your efforts to improve Wikipedia on its 20th birthday, quite a thing.
On sources, we generally don't rely on other encyclopedia-like websites (tertiary sources) which offer general definitions: those may be better than nothing, but really we like to use reliable secondary sources which are specialised to the kind of knowledge in a particular article: in a yoga article, that means yoga research or independent yoga websites.
I saw that you added sources to the lead (top) section in articles; this is usually not necessary, as long as the article's body (the main text) is properly cited, i.e. the lead is allowed to rely on the body's citations.
One small thing: if you want to reuse a citation, you don't have to define it all over again with identical copies. All you need to do is to name it the first time, and reuse the name part, like this:
<ref name="AYLI 3.1">As You Like It, Act 3, Scene 1</ref> ......... text.<ref name="AYLI 3.1"/>
Note that the reused named ref has to end with a / just before the final angle bracket.
Note by the way that the final "." goes just before the ref!
What a lot of things to remember all at once. Good luck! Chiswick Chap (talk) 15:02, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
January 2021
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Asana, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Hi, I've given you a friendly explanation with suggestions and you've totally ignored it! Not good enough. Chiswick Chap (talk) 09:53, 16 January 2021 (UTC)