Jump to content

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/A bicyclette

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Oshwah (talk | contribs) at 11:00, 27 January 2021 (CU results). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

A bicyclette

A bicyclette (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log· investigate · cuwiki)

Populated account categories: confirmed · suspected

For archived investigations, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/A bicyclette/Archive.



27 January 2021

– A checkuser has completed a check on relevant users in this case, and it is now awaiting administration and close.

Suspected sockpuppets

Just a few days after the close of an earlier SPI for inactivity, the IP returns along with XiAdonis arguing on the usual topics, Vietnam War and wartime rape by South Korean forces. A bicyclette continues to improve covering his/her tracks making proving socking increasingly difficult. A few giveaways are adopting the same referencing style used by A bicyclette of <ref name=":0"> even when the ref isn't repeated and the inclusion of English language in the reference even when it is plainly the case, IP here: [1] and A Bicyclette here: [2]. XiAdonis and 8ya operate as a tag team on Lai Đại Hàn, making the same edits: [3] and [4] and Xiadonis here: [5] and the IP has also joined in here: [6]. IP geolocates to Ontario Canada, same as other IP socks and A bicyclette's original IP edits. The editwarring and general argumentative style on Talk Pages, insulting me, accusing me of not accepting any other views is exactly the same as that of A bicyclette and their various socks. Same agenda, same MO. WP:DUCK Mztourist (talk) 10:41, 27 January 2021 (UTC) Mztourist (talk) 10:41, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

  • So I'm the IP User. I did edit a completely unrelated page on what I thought was a fair edit on the Tet Offensive page. User brazenly reverts it of course and starts trying to bully his way into an edit war, while I made a talk page, the user refused to try to resolve things and tries to take ownership of that page. Checking his early edits he was making, he seems to have a pattern of doing this, and I reverted an edit I thought was fair which led me to find the Lai Dai Han page. The user has an agenda by the way since the user is trying to discredit/wash out things he disagrees with, clearly. For example, he starts a talk page trying to discredit a group called Justice For Lai Dai Han. [7]. This is the source that refers to the group, BBCNews: [8]. Anyways, I made a very different edit on that page by summarizing the content of it, and did encourage the user to cooperate rather than try to get into edit wars. Instead the user reverts my edit, calls sexual assaults 'wartime romances', and uses some other pretty disgusting euphemisms. There also seems to be a problem in this user abusing SPI reporting. 216.209.50.103 (talk) 10:52, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments