Wikipedia:Help desk

Welcome—ask questions about how to use or edit Wikipedia! (Am I in the right place?)

• For other types of questions, use the search box, see the reference desk or Help:Contents. If you have comments about a specific article, use that article's talk page.
• Do not provide your email address or any other contact information. Answers will be provided on this page only.
• If your question is about a Wikipedia article, draft article, or other page on Wikipedia, tell us what it is!
• Check back on this page to see if your question has been answered.
• For real-time help, use our IRC help channel, #wikipedia-en-help.
• New editors may prefer the Teahouse, a help area for beginners (but please don't ask in both places).

Ask a question

January 29

Barry N. Haack

I have written and substantially many Wikipedia pages, typically about historical figures and contemporaries who stand out in my profession. Most recently (last fall) I submitted an article on Barry N. Haack, a recently retired professor who is a pioneer in the field of remote sensing. The draft article was immediately critiqued for lack of references (although there were many). Many more were added, and the article we resubmitted nearly five months ago. So far, no editor has looked at it. How do I call it to the attention of editors now that it has been revised? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Twilson088 (talk • contribs) 00:03, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

 Courtesy link: Draft:Barry N. Haack TimTempleton ^{(talk) (cont)} 00:07, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

and Twilson088, (Please remember to sign your posts on talk pages by typing four keyboard tildes like this: ~~~~. Or, you can use the [ reply ] button, which automatically signs posts.). TimTempleton ^{(talk) (cont)} 00:08, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

@Twilson088: you've submitted the draft for review, but it may take a while to be looked at by a reviewer, so unfortunately all you can do is be patient. As the yellow box at the bottom of the draft says, There are 4,007 pending submissions waiting for review. However - while I am not a reviewer myself - the "Early Life and Education" section appears to have no references at all, so consider adding inline citations to relevant references in that section. Seagull123 Φ 01:04, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

What does URL live status mean at the end of a reference

Can someone explain to me what URL live status is at the end of a reference. Also is it important when adding references to a Wikipedia article? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikieditor6557 (talk • contribs) 01:23, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

@Wikieditor6557: see the documentation at {{cite web}}, which is a massive tangle of information which is likely to make your eyes glaze over. The URL status is unused unless the archive URL is set. When url-status=live, it means that the original URL is still good, but the reference is also available at the archive site. This affects the way the reference is presented to the reader, so the reader will click on the original and only go to the archive if the original has died. As an editor you should put it in only if the original URL is still live and you also have an archive URL, and you have a suspicion that the original is likely to remain live for awhile. -Arch dude (talk) 03:21, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

What do you do when a reference link is dead

FYI

 – Merging with above. —Tenryuu 🐲 ( 💬 • 📝 ) 05:03, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

If your reference link is dead what do you do or how do you fix it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikieditor6557 (talk • contribs) 03:31, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

You tag it with a Template:Dead link or go hunting for where it may have been moved. Clarityfiend (talk) 06:07, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

Or both. Clarityfiend (talk) 06:08, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

@Wikieditor6557: See WP:DEADREF for more info. —[AlanM1 (talk)]— 06:12, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

Sandbox

I have a question regarding the wikipedia sandbox. If I create a draft on sandbox and click the publish button but I do NOT click to submit it for review, is that draft only visible to me? SpotBeanz (talk) 06:19, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

No, it is publicly visible. Enjoyer — talk 06:46, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

SpotBeanz, virtually everything on Wikipedia is visible to everyone. The button was changed to Publish changes due to some legal mumbo-jumbo a while back to make people understand that their edits are public, even if the edits aren't in mainspace. —Tenryuu 🐲 ( 💬 • 📝 ) 07:01, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

Tenryuu, which "legal mumbo-jumbo" is this? Can you provide a link? Sounds interesting to read. Enjoyer — talk 08:14, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

@Enjoyer of World: See Wikipedia:Village pump (miscellaneous)/Archive 57#Change to the edit submission button label. PrimeHunter (talk) 17:18, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

@Enjoyer of World: The "reasoning" behind the change relates to our terms of use and copyright law. Any time you put anything anywhere on the Internet in a form that is visible to anyone else, you are "publishing" it in the sense of the term in copyright law, and you own the copyright. By our terms of use, when you make any additions of any type anywhere in Wikipedia, You agree to license your copyright to us (and anyone else) under the CC-BY-SA license. Calling the button "publish" makes it clear(?!) that you understand that you are licensing your copyright. This has caused quite a bit of confusion among non-lawyers who are trying to add an article to Wikipedia and who use the term "publish" with its more common definition. -Arch dude (talk) 18:05, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

@SpotBeanz: Please note, though, that the Wikipedia:Sandbox is commmon to all users, and is routinely cleared out or edited by other editors, and so is not a good place for a draft article. Your personal sandbox at User:SpotBeanz/sandbox or another page under your userspace, like User:SpotBeanz/Article Name Here, or Draft:Article Name Here is a better place to draft an article. —[AlanM1 (talk)]— 05:50, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

An authorized user on my account

An authorized user on my account I want this off my phone — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:843:4100:6110:69E6:88ED:AD4B:519 (talk) 06:48, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

This is a forum for asking questions about editing on Wikipedia. We can’t really help you with your phone issues. TimTempleton ^{(talk) (cont)} 09:12, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

You appear to have installed the Wikipedia app on your phone. You will need to find the instructions for un-installing apps on your particular type of phone. These instructions work for any app on your phone and are not under the control of Wikipedia. -Arch dude (talk) 18:08, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

Recreation of the merged article

A year ago, with the support of two other editors, I merged Goldberry to Tom Bombadil. Now the article has been recreated. I still think it should be merged. What is the correct procedure? To go through a merge process again?--Jack Upland (talk) 07:43, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

...or probably leave it alone. Enjoyer — talk 08:18, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

@Jack Upland: It looks like both characters are notable enough to have their own articles. Is that OK? TimTempleton ^{(talk) (cont)} 09:15, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

I don't think that's really credible.--Jack Upland (talk) 22:18, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

Question about categories

How is it decided whether an article, or the category of the same name, or both, will be included in a given supercategory? For example, both United States and Category:United States are located in Category:Superpowers, only United States is included in Category:Transcontinental countries, only United States is located in Former British colonies, but only Category:United States is located in Category:Former British colonies and protectorates in the Americas. —Naddruf (talk ~ contribs) 07:44, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

@Naddruf: Not everybody who adds an article to a category knows all of the categories that exist, so if there are some that should be added, you are always welcome to do so. My only rule of thumb is you want to make sure that you put the article in the most specific category. If you don’t, the next person might. TimTempleton ^{(talk) (cont)} 09:10, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

That doesn't really answer my question. I'm not sure if the article and the category of the same name should be in all the same categories. —Naddruf (talk ~ contribs) 16:29, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

Economics

What is demand — Preceding unsigned comment added by 105.112.66.112 (talk) 08:58, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

Hi IP. This is meant to be a help desk for Wikipedia related questions but I believe you should check out supply and demand. HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 09:05, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

Wikipedia Twitter Handle and iPhone / Android App ...

Does anyone know a) who works the Wikipedia Twitter account? b) who determines the main page content on the iPhone / Android app (not the en.m.wikipedia.org mobile browser website main page)? Any leads? Thanks. Ktin (talk) 09:15, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

@Ktin: meta:Social media appears to say that it's the WMF's communications department that runs the social media accounts, and specifically AJohnson (WMF) who runs the Twitter account. I can't find anything about the apps, however. Seagull123 Φ 15:41, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

@Seagull123:, thanks much. Dropped AJohnson (WMF) a message on their talk page. However, seems like they are not very active on this side of Wikipedia. Let's see if the message reaches them. Thanks for the lead. Ktin (talk) 16:57, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

Hi Ktin, that's a good question. Unfortunately it's not mentioned at mw:Wikimedia Apps/iOS FAQ. The Featured Article card is the same as on wp:en main page. Picture of the Day is from Commons rather than 'pedia; Commons:Picture of the day says that the POTD is selected from Featured Pictures, but I couldn’t find who chooses that or where it's discussed. On This Day currently appears to have the same items as January 31#Events. Places I guess might be random if the app has no access to location services, maybe with some filter so that you only get good articles or major places (just guessing there). Top Read would, I suppose, be auto-generated from pageview stats – I wonder if it's for previous calendar day, dynamic throughout the day, or some kind of rolling multi-day average? I have In the News enabled in Settings, but don’t get a card for it. Pelagic ( messages ) – (20:14 Sun 31, AEDT) 09:14, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

Help wanted: template documentation expert

I edited the document and removed colon before category names (Please Click here). But, these categories didn't go outside the green box (template documentation) and the template are not shown in every single categories. Can anyone fix the template? St3095 ^(?) 09:40, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

@St3095: I've fixed it just by purging the template page. After your edit to the documentation subpage, the software just needed a kick to tell it to rethink the display of the template page. -- John of Reading (talk) 10:00, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

live help channel

Hi, I am banned from the help live channel. I dont know why and would like to be unbanned. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Threesom666 (talk • contribs) 10:31, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

@Threesom666: Is this still an issue? —[AlanM1 (talk)]— 06:09, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

yes. I am banned from the live help channel. Here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:IRC_help_disclaimer — Preceding unsigned comment added by Threesom666 (talk • contribs) 10:27, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

Jimmy Savile

Savile honours were either removed or were acknowledged that they passed with his death. Therefore I think that you should remove his title of Sir from his entry as it demeans the honour to have his name attached — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.255.85.23 (talk) 12:24, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

This was discussed at Talk:Jimmy Savile/Archive 8#'Sir' Should be removed from all descriptors. If you disagree, start a new discussion at Talk:Jimmy Savile. Joseph2302 (talk) 12:34, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

Move my article from sandbox to publishing

Hello, we have wrotten an article on the sandbox and do not know if this page is under review or if we need to submit something. thanks for your help, Nathalie — Preceding unsigned comment added by LuMond (talk • contribs) 14:33, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

Who is "we"? --Orange Mike | Talk 15:24, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

Please note, LuMond that articles on potential drug candidates are held to a much higher standard of sourcing than other articles. This is explained at WP:MEDRS, which you should read and comply with before submitting the article for review. In particular you need to clarify what you mean by "intended to be used as a therapeutic drug in humans". At what stage are the clinical trials? Mike Turnbull (talk) 16:19, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

help editing wiki page

Is there any kind soul out there who can update my wiki page? I need an updated photo and a new publication added to my page. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Janet_Bennion — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jbb10020 (talk • contribs) 15:14, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

Hi @Jbb10020: if there's anything specific in the article you want changing or adding, please go to the article talk page, and in a new section, leave a request explaining the changes you want made, and also leave a {{request edit}} template along with it. To see more about how to update the photo in the article, read this page: Wikipedia:About you, specifically the "Picture" section; or this page: Wikipedia:A picture of you. Also, if you haven't done so already, please make sure you understand Wikipedia's conflict of interest (COI) guidelines. You can read them here: WP:COI. There are also some pages which may be of interest to you here: Wikipedia:Notable person survival kit, Wikipedia:Plain and simple conflict of interest guide, and Wikipedia:Help available for editors with conflicts of interest. Seagull123 Φ 15:25, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

Great advice, Seagull! I didn’t know of "About you" and "A picture of you"; I'll try to remember to mention them in future. Pelagic ( messages ) – (20:33 Sun 31, AEDT) 09:33, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

@Pelagic: glad I could help! I can't remember where I found those in the first place though. Seagull123 Φ 17:57, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

With respect to the new publication, Jbb10020, is it The Polygamy Question, or something more recent? I added the former from its WorldCat listing, though I'm not sure how best to format your co-author in that list. Pelagic ( messages ) – (22:40 Sun 31, AEDT) 11:40, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

Thank you, Seagull. Yes, I'd love the Polygamy Question and my new Sexualities article to be mentioned which is my ethnography of a polyamorous community in Paris. This is my new direction in research. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1363460720975328. I'd love to update my photo but don't know how to get it to you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:19B:C502:BD70:3189:5A51:B218:D5B4 (talk) 15:30, 31 January 2021 (UTC) Seagull123 Φ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:19B:C502:BD70:3189:5A51:B218:D5B4 (talk) 15:30, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

I also want to update my image, taken by my girlfriend in Montana, copyright by me. I linked it to this address: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Bennion_photo.jpg — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jbb10020 (talk • contribs) 15:43, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

@Jbb10020:  Done! GoingBatty (talk) 15:58, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

Please help with updating article

Hi there, I am trying to update this article with current information and it keeps being rejected. I did a "request edit" in the talk page disclosed that I am a family member of Annabelle Chvostek's. I am trying to be as neutral and factual as possible. Please tell me what I'm doing wrong so I can correct it. Thank you! Here is the additional info for the page:

Resilience was nominated for a Canadian Folk Music Award and includes a co-write with Bruce Cockburn'. In 2012, Annabelle released the album 'Rise', which she co-produced with Torontonian Don Kerr. 'Rise' was nominated for a Juno Award and a Canadian Folk Music Award. In 2015, she released the 'Be The Media, co-produced with Jeff Oehler of Beehive Productions in Saranac Lake, NY.

Her upcoming album "String Of Pearls" is due out in March, 2021. It is a collaboration between Canadian and Uruguayan musicians, with musical arrangements by Uruguayan composer and multi-instrumentalist, Fernando Rosa. "String Of Pearls" was co-produced by David Travers-Smith, Fernando Rosa, and Annabelle Chvostek, and was recorded in both Toronto and Montevideo.:

   updating info:
   References supporting the possible change (format using the "cite" button):

[1] [2][3]

Tplanter (talk) 02:23, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

References

"Results 2008 | Canadian Folk Music Awards". Folkawards.ca. 3 May 2009. Retrieved 28 January 2021. "Results 2013 | Canadian Folk Music Awards". 11 November 2013. Retrieved 28 January 2021.Tplanter (talk) 16:11, 29 January 2021 (UTC) "2013 | Roots & Traditional Album of the Year: Solo | Annabelle Chvostek |". The JUNO Awards. Retrieved 28 January 2021.Tplanter (talk) 16:08, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

Hello, Tplanter. Nobody has yet responded to your edit request from yesterday. For reasons I don't understand (but the comment says "test edit") Terasail marked it as "answered" (but didn't action it) and then undid their edit. Then you came along and reverted the edit in which they had undone their test, leaving the request as apparently answered. I have restored the request. --ColinFine (talk) 17:18, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

Thank you so much, ColinFine! Tplanter (talk) 17:33, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

I had just finished working on a userscript to respond to conflict of interest edit requests, and wanted to check that it worked as intended. Sorry if it caused any confusion. Terasail II^[✉] 18:04, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

Wikipedia Says Trump Jr Is a ‘Conspiracy Theorist’ Who ‘Colluded With Russia’ And ‘Incited Capitol Riot’

I have pretty much always had faith in what I read on Wikipedia, however this statement (Wikipedia Says Trump Jr Is a ‘Conspiracy Theorist’ Who ‘Colluded With Russia’ And ‘Incited Capitol Riot’) and all it's posturing is political in nature by Wikipedia Staff, this statement serves no value other than to discredit Mr. Trump Jr and will forever discredit Wikipedia as being an openly "Biased" publication! Forget about Republicans and Democrats! Wikipedia stood for truth, worthwhile information, free speech, journalistic integrity! However now it has resorted to "Tabloid Status" and your content will be permanently ignored by at least 80 million US Citizens and the world at large! Jimfi1955 (talk) 17:13, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

@Jimfi1955: You are seriously overestimating the influence of a story on a website ranked 184,384.[1] We have six million articles, written by volunteer editors and not "staff". You can post sourced suggestions to Talk:Donald Trump Jr. PrimeHunter (talk) 17:38, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

References

@Jimfi1955: The statements in our article are referenced to multiple reliable sources, primarily news organizations with international reputations. The En volve article you cite makes no attempt to refute these allegations and cites no sources. En volve describes itself as conservative. That site is a set of web pages with a layout like a news site, but it is apparently just a blog. It has none of the hallmarks of a reliable source. In particular. There is no statement as to who runs the site, or who the publisher is. A web search for En volve returns only two hits for the site (and many hits for totally different sites): here are the hits: the factcheck misinformation directory and the mediabiasfactcheck entry. Thus the site is completely biased and published falsehoods, and it is not even itself notable enough to have a Wikipedia entry. You should ask yourself why you trust such a site more than you trust Wikipedia. -Arch dude (talk) 03:08, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

@Jimfi1955: Wikipedia does not claim to be free of bias. Any bias in sources will be reflected in Wikipedia. We present the sources to readers so they can evaluate and judge them for themselves as to bias. We don't claim anything here is the truth, only that it is possible to verify what us written. If there are missing reliable sources and you are interested in civilly collaborating with other editors, regardless of their political views, please offer your suggestions. If you just want to push talking points from the conservative bubble, and read only what you want to hear, this is not the place for you. 331dot (talk) 11:57, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

When speaking of others, maybe a certain degree of noninflammatory hyperbole would be in order. Remember those who do not follow Liberal party line dogma, further those who question the reemergence of involuntary servitude of the masses by this mass media orchestrated campaign of censorship and suppression of the truth in todays climate, and lastly those who question the malignant masters of the bourgeoisie are at this point in fact ‘Conspiracy Theorist’ which is of course our right, one of which I might ad is contained within the "Bill of Rights"! For one instance forget about ones political indoctrination and subjugation by either the Left or the Right, because I know I have, I'm a "Free Thinker" and deal with the truth, not solicitous platitudes describing anyone maliciously for any reason! Truth, not speculation, nothing less, nothing more, and definitely nothing from the "Fact Checked" political pundits representing either side alleging an unbiased viewpoint. Next, I would like to also address your use of the term "Conservative Bubble" which speaks volumes as to your political affiliations. Furthermore, I realize bias will always exist in a free society with "Free Speech" simply because the animal mankind is bellicose by nature and independent in thought, however we can curtail our avaricious nature and exhibit a minimal degree of literary neutrality of with the aforementioned statement about Mr. Trump Jr clearly did not and is overtly obvious to the most simplest layperson that mass media manipulation along with suppression of the truth are driving this campaign of melee, divisiveness, and strategic political posturing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jimfi1955 (talk • contribs) 16:50, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

Wikipedia Information!

Is the information displayed on Wikipedia biased or unbiased in nature? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jimfi1955 (talk • contribs) 17:16, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

@Jimfi1955: Wikipedia strives for a neutral point of view (WP:NPOV). We do this by requiring that our editors cite their assertions to reliable sources (WP:RS). If those sources are biased, then Wikipedia is biased, but we strive to counter this by using multiple sources when available. -Arch dude (talk) 17:43, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

@Jimfi1955: There is nothing that is unbiased, and that includes Wikipedia. Wikipedia does not claim to be free of bias. Wikipedia presents the sources to readers so they can evaluate and judge them for themselves as to bias or other factors. We don't deal in truth, as truth is in the eye of the beholder, but we do deal in what can be verified. 331dot (talk) 17:59, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

Edits to the Page Deric Angelettie

I am the person who's page this is about. Why is so hard to make changes? The page keeps erasing my changes after hours of making changes. This is very time consuming for me and a waste of time if someone random can just erase it. Please advise. How does someone who knows nothing about the person allowed to edit and disregard a page when they have references and links to prove the validity of the information? For the information that is not on "Wikipedia" what is the simplest way to prove the validity of information without "The Wiki Police" taking it down? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 100.34.2.203 (talk) 18:24, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

Hello. I'm afraid that, like many people, you misunderstand what Wikipedia is. It is an encyclopaedia, not social media or a directory. Articles should be neutrally written, and based almost entirely on independent sources, not on what the subject says or wants to say. If we have an article about you, you should not be editing it, as you are likely to find it difficult to keep the tone neutral; but you are welcome to suggest edits to the article on its talk page, using the edit request procedure. The changes you made to the article were unsourced, and we have no way of telling whether unsourced material is correct or not, so we generally remove it, especially from articles about living people. Please see ABOUTYOU for more information. --ColinFine (talk) 19:17, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

Query about Autoconfirmed users template

I added this userbox to my User page since I am an autoconfirmed user, but when I click verify it says "No user found". Why is this?

In Preferences>User profile it says Member of groups:Autoconfirmed users, Users, which indicates that I am. So why does the database think otherwise? — Preceding unsigned comment added by KaraLG84 (talk • contribs) 18:27, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

@KaraLG84: For whatever reason (probbably because autoconfirmed is a very common right) Special:ListUsers doesn't support this group. Victor Schmidt (talk) 18:41, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

@Victor Schmidt: Ah that makes sense. Thanks.

BTW Apologies for forgetting to sign my first message.KaraLG84 (talk) 19:23, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

@KaraLG84: Autoconfirmed is assigned automatically and doesn't appear at Special:ListUsers. {{User wikipedia/Autoconfirmed}} uses {{User rights}}. I have changed the latter to use another feature for autoconfirmed. Your verify link now works. Before this, it failed on all 574 users with the userbox. PrimeHunter (talk) 03:55, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

@PrimeHunter: Thanks. I thought I'd mention it in case someone questioned why I had put that box on my page.KaraLG84 (talk) 15:27, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

Question by CountryCoolGuy12345

so i was typing something on martin van buren's page, and all of a sudden it stopped and now i don't know how to revert my change help i don't wanna get banned — Preceding unsigned comment added by CountryCoolGuy12345 (talk • contribs) 18:49, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

Don't worry about it, CountryCoolGuy12345: it would be unusual for an editor to be banned or blocked for making mistakes; and another editor reverted yours about six minutes later. Even if they hadn't, you can always revert your own edit: Pick "History", and you can see the edits, and who made them. --ColinFine (talk) 19:21, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

Question by 88.145.154.86

Your cavity wall insulation page shows a bad photo the wall cavity should not be abridged by insulation all accross .There should be an air space gap between face of insulation bat and outer wall . The width of the fibre glass bat should be about less than a third of what is shown in you bad photo representation. There are only 3 types of cavity wall insulation bat fibreglass mineralwool or polyester these are all BIOBREATHABLE [also there should be an air space gap clearance between edge of cavity wall tie drip point to face of well formed bat of 3/4 inch . So in a cavity of 3 inch you have 2 1/4 inch +0.2/4 inch (THAT IS JUST A FRACTION OVER 2 3/4 INCH space gap) and cavity insulation bat of 2.8 /4 inch ( just less than 3/4 inch thick)] BIOBREATHABLE masonry walls allows all cooking steam and body exercise vapour and body breathing and moisture vapour that builds up in house to be able to pass from inside of house through both masonry leaves and insulation bats (walls) to outside of house hence "BIOBREATHABLE MASONRY WALLS" YOU SHOULD CHANGE PHOTO FOR A MUCH THINNER INSULATION BAT AND LARGE AIR SPACE GAP OR IT CAN MISLEAD GENERAL PUBLIC ASK CITY AND GUILDS BRICKWORK TEACHERS THEY WILL TELL YOU THE SAME — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.145.154.86 (talk) 18:58, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

Hello, IP user. If you have an improvement to suggest to a Wikipedia article, please make your suggestion on that article's talk page. Where it concerns a picture: if you can find a better picture in Wikimedia Commons, then you can edit the article to use that picture. if not, it's a bit harder, because copyright severely restricts the images we can use. If you have a better picture yourself (that you took), you are welcome to upload it using the upload wizard, and then add it to the article in question. But it sounds as if you want material added to the article as well, in which case, posting your suggestion on the article's talk page - with citations to reliable published sources, please - is the way to go. --ColinFine (talk) 19:24, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

page humiliating Rajput community

• Link: Rajput

this page is heavily edited to hurt the rajput sentiments  and spread misinformation  these edits are nothing but acts of vandalismthere has been deliberate attempt to humiliate rajput and their rich tradition and history either delete the page or take off the baseless information put  on the page This page should be purged or taken down   — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dhaba sanp dumbedkar (talk • contribs) 19:45, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

Dhaba sanp dumbedkar It is difficult to respond to a general grievance. If you have specific content you are concerned about, please bring it up on the article talk page. Please understand that Wikipedia summarizes what independent reliable sources state. If the sources in the article are being summarized accurately, you will have to discuss your grievances with them. 331dot (talk) 19:56, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

(edit conflict)@Dhaba sanp dumbedkar: Please discuss your concerns at Talk:Rajput. But first read the discussions that have already occurred on that page and its archives. If you find "baseless" (i.e., unsourced) assertions, then bring those specific assertions up on the talk page. A general complaint that the article as a whole is bad is not very useful as a guide to improving it. -Arch dude (talk) 19:59, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

İlker Kaleli

I need help to a new picture of İlker Kaleli. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 185.173.207.129 (talk) 20:22, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

Hello. It's not clear whether you mean you have a picture to upload, or want help finding a picture. If you have a picture of him that you took (so it is your own work), you may upload it to Wikimedia Commons, using the Upload Wizard, and then inset it into an article. But if you haven't got a picture you took yourself, it is much more complicated, as the copyright owner has to license it to be free for reuse (not just give permission for Wikipedia to use it). But if you want to work on that article, much much much more important than cosmetic things like pictures would be adding citations to reliable sources for all the information which is currently not sourced. --ColinFine (talk) 23:10, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

Rename

Hi, I want to translate my username into English. How can I do this?--ارتین محمدیان (talk) 22:00, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

ارتین محمدیان, are you referring to a complete name change of your account or just on English Wikipedia? If it's the former, you will want to look into a name change (easiest is through Special:GlobalRenameRequest if you have a connected email address to the account), or if the latter, just change your signature (WP:SIGTUT gives a tutorial on that). —Tenryuu 🐲 ( 💬 • 📝 ) 22:44, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

I decided to change my name altogether, but I think the second method, namely signing, was easier. Thank you for your support.--(•_•) ^{(Συζητώ)} 22:46, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

The (slight) problem with that solution, ارتین محمدیان is that in order to ping you (as I have done here), most editors on English Wikipedia will not have an Arabic Keyboard, so will have to copy and paste your username. That in turn is tricky if you're not used to it, because of the way the editor works with selections on RTL text. (I thinik it is especially likely that they may miss the alif at the beginning: some people may not even realise it is a letter). It's not a major problem, but my guess is that you will not get some intended notifications, because people either copy your username wrong, or give up on pinging you at all. --ColinFine (talk) 22:58, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

yes correctly, I tried to change the name here for the managers to do.--(•_•) ^{(Συζητώ)} 23:03, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

ارتین محمدیان has been adding grammar errors to articles. I started reverting them but could use some help - there are a lot to review. TimTempleton ^{(talk) (cont)} 00:51, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

Excuse me, you are with me؟؟؟What errors do you mean?--(•_•) ^{(Συζητώ)} 01:00, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

@ارتین محمدیان: Please look at your edit history. Your first edit [[2]] was grammatically incorrect, and there were others that I reverted. If you look in your contribution history, you can see what I've reverted already. I don't think you should be editing so rapidly after starting a brand new account if you do not have a good grasp of the English language. You are only making more work for the other volunteer editors. WP:NOTHERE TimTempleton ^{(talk) (cont)} 03:40, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

I apologize to you, I am a novice and I have to increase my accuracy.--(•_•) ^{(Συζητώ)} 14:28, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

UTC)

@ارتین محمدیان: It would be a nice gesture of goodwill to the community if you would go back and undo the edits that were grammatically incorrect. The rule of thumb with using “a” versus “an” is if the following word starts with a vowel, or has a silent consonant like with “hour”, you need “an”. Otherwise you use “a”. So it’s “a disruptive editor” instead of “an disruptive editor”. And why also the rapid undo of the IP edits? This does not fit the profile of a brand new editor. Have you edited using another profile? TimTempleton ^{(talk) (cont)} 14:53, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

No, I do not have another account, but I have already edited it with IP. I have been familiar with the main Wikipedia space for years, but I was not familiar with politics.--(•_•) ^{(Συζητώ)} 15:05, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

I reverted the edits that were wrong.--(•_•) ^{(Συζητώ)} 15:07, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

My username has been changed.--Artin M123 ^{(Συζητώ)} 16:34, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

Draft:2019−20 Coppa Italia Dilettanti

Hi! I want to create this page about an Italian amateur Cup. Is It suitable For Wikipedia? Dr Salvus (talk) 23:24, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

Dr Salvus, it depends on what reliable sources you can find that establishes its notability for Wikipedia. —Tenryuu 🐲 ( 💬 • 📝 ) 23:27, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

TenryuuThere are some reliable sources. The problem is that the competition is of regional importance and that it is a tournament that takes place between the fifth and sixth tier teams of the Italian football pyramid. I would like to know if this type of article is suitable for Wikipedia — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dr Salvus (talk • contribs) 23:37, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

Dr Salvus, I'd make a draft of it and have a reviewer make the assessment as to whether it's notable. If you can find three reliable sources for reviewers to evaluate that'd be helpful. —Tenryuu 🐲 ( 💬 • 📝 ) 17:35, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

There is already Coppa Italia Dilettanti, but it's mostly a bare-bones list of the annual winners. You could check with Wikipedia:WikiProject Football. — Pelagic ( messages ) – (22:54 Sun 31, AEDT) 11:54, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

January 30

Category question

Category:Former buildings and structures in Finland now includes both Vyborg railway station and Vyborg railway station (1913). However, this is a little bit confusing, as Vyborg railway station hasn't gone anywhere, it's still standing there in Vyborg, and in active use. It's just a "former building in Finland" because Vyborg itself is no longer in Finland. Is this OK, or should there be some sort of separate category for buildings that aren't former but just formerly were somewhere? JIP | Talk 00:19, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

@JIP: You added Category:Former buildings and structures of Finland to Vyborg railway station in 2007.[3] That seems wrong. Category:Former buildings and structures says: This category is for buildings and structures that no longer exist. I don't think we have or should have categories for places which were formerly in another country. PrimeHunter (talk) 03:00, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

Thank you, I did not remember that. I have removed the category from Vyborg railway station. You seem to have mistyped the name of the category in your reply but that is a mere technicality. I think this has sorted it out. JIP | Talk 03:11, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

I copied the category name you added in 2007. The category was renamed in 2013. PrimeHunter (talk) 03:45, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

edit

Hello, need to make an edit to the Oak Park-River Forest High School alumni section. I don't feel comfortable doing it myself. Ludacris should be on the page. Chris Bridges has mentioned several times that he went to the school. There is not a place to put musicians under media. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1700:B4D0:3000:F0DD:F1E1:B7E9:7CFA (talk) 03:51, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

Nope. The only source in Ludacris "supporting" that claim was IMDb, which is unreliable. (The Chicago Tribune reference only mentioned his middle school.) I've removed it. If you have a reliable source, then it could be restored in the article and he could be added to the high school. Clarityfiend (talk) 05:43, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

Also, this is the wrong forum for questions like this. The talk page of the high school (or possibly Ludacris) is where you should have gone. Clarityfiend (talk) 05:45, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

There's a Washington Post article which talks about it, but it requires a subscription. From what I can see (briefly), it sounds like it debunks the idea, but I can't tell for sure. Clarityfiend (talk) 05:47, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

@Clarityfiend: I can see (without a subscription – maybe they have an article views per day limit) what appears to be the article as published, which matches this archive, but it seems to end abruptly, simply saying that Ludacris said to Czarniak that he attended the school, and that she then tweeted that he was there, but it's not clear she remembers him. The author goes on to say that they are both 37, so there's a good chance they were there at the same time, but then makes no claim about the truth of the statement. OTOH, is it really something controversial? —[AlanM1 (talk)]— 06:52, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

Okay. I see that both articles have been updated. Clarityfiend (talk) 07:13, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

I am a Washington Post subscriber, and this is the relevant quote from that article: "While it’s been reported that Ludacris attended Oak Park and River Forest High School in Illinois and later graduated from Banneker High School in Atlanta, there’s long been a rumor that he attended Centreville High School, Czarniak’s alma mater, for a short time. Czarniak asked him to set the record straight. 'One year, yep,' Ludacris said. 'One year. Because my mother lived in Centreville and I moved from Chicago to there. It was for one year'." Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 07:22, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

Page Protection question

Hi there, I am looking for some guidance on page protection. Recently several IPs and editors have repeatedly deleted the "Recent Usage" section of the Pine Tree Flag page. This section now has multiple reliable sources cited, namely journalists and photojournalists, as well as linking to a short posting by the commentator Andrew Sullivan about the flag's recent use.

One IP making these deletions repeatedly calls these paragraphs "communist propaganda" and "hate speech" in his/her edit summaries for the deletions. This anonymous editor is not using the Talk page, which does have a discussion started on recent use of the flag. Neither this anonymous user or the other deleters are elaborating on their rationale. A national news article about the events at the US Capitol on Jan. 6 2021 linked to this wikipedia page which may have increased its traffic.

A request to semi-protect the page based on deletion of reliably sourced information temporarily was just rejected. The reasons given by the admin who rejected the request were that the citations include a link to a blog (the Andrew Sullivan opinion piece) and that a content dispute should be in the talk section.

If the Sullivan link is removed would it be worth it to make another request to try again to get this page temporarily semi-protected? Should I have indicated the reason for the request was vandalism instead of removal of reliably sourced information? I have never tried to protect a page before. It's kind of discouraging if the only option is to just keep reverting the deletion of actually factual and relevant content. Thanks in advance for any insight. Fathomharvill (talk) 04:08, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

What’s the point of archiving references and how do you do it?

Can someone explain to me why people archive references for Wikipedia article and how do you do it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikieditor6557 (talk • contribs) 04:38, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

@Wikieditor6557: the Wikimedia foundation (and Wikipedia) do not archive references. This is done by the Internet Archive, which is an entirely separate organization. The internet archive has a system called the "wayback machine" that crawls the web and captures snapshots of web pages that do not disallow it. You can explicitly request it to archive a particular page, and it will do so if allowed. The point of all this is that pages disappear on the web for various reasons. You might choose to request archiving for a page if you are concerned that the page will not remain in a stable location on the web. -Arch dude (talk) 05:59, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

@Wikieditor6557: We have a help page for this at Help:Archiving a source. I was unaware until I read it just now that we have a bot that asks the Wayback Machine to archive all new references in articles. However, we do not appear to have a bot to automatically add the archive URL to our references. I suspect that such a bot would be unworkable because there are too many potential problems that require human intervention. -Arch dude (talk) 06:21, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

(Edit conflict) @Wikieditor6557: The reason is that specific urls simply disappear from time to time, often when web server administrators reconfigure their web pages. This results in WP:LINKROT, and typically a 404 error, Page Not Found. Editors and bots can place {{Dead link}} by the ref as a warning. Sometimes the page has simply been given a new url, and a search within a website may find it. More often stuff just gets deleted or there is no search facility. The Wayback Machine, part of the internet archive.org may well have saved the page in the past, and Wikipedia's {{cite}} or {{citation}} templates allow the archived page to be referenced, and also refer to the dead one. The Wayback Machine[4] allows you to save individual live pages immediately, see Save Pages in the Wayback Machine. When searching for archived pages, only the blue dots work, the green and orange ones are no use.

The main two parameters to use within eg {{cite web}} are: |archive-url= and |archive-date=, along with the standard |url= and |access-date=. The optional |url-status=live or =dead determines whether to display either the current or the archive url as the first link in the ref. I get the feeling that either Good articles or Featured articles, or both, require all urls to be archived.

Here's an example: {{cite web |title=1870 A 5 French Silver Francs (Liberty head) |website=SilverAgeCoins |url=https://www.silveragecoins.com/en/details?item=7106 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200813003740/https://www.silveragecoins.com/en/details?item=7106#expand |archive-date=13 August 2020 |access-date=30 January 2021 |url-status=live}}, which results in
"1870 A 5 French Silver Francs (Liberty head)". SilverAgeCoins. Archived from the original on 13 August 2020. Retrieved 30 January 2021. >MinorProphet (talk) 07:01, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

(ec) @Arch dude and Wikieditor6557: IABot can add archive links to article(s). Check the "Add archives to all non-dead references" here. —[AlanM1 (talk)]— 07:08, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

@AlanM1: Wow, I just registered and used it on an article with multiple links, took about 30 seconds. Pretty impressive, thanks. It's a bit clunky to get back to the user page after logging out, so I saved the toolforge url as a link on my own user page. Cheers, >MinorProphet (talk) 19:23, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

Draft or sandbox?

When a user wants to create a page is it better to create it in the form of a draft or in the sandbox? Dr Salvus (talk) 08:08, 30 January 2021 (UTC)Dr SalvusDr Salvus (talk) 08:08, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

Hello, Dr Salvus. There isn't a whole lot of difference, except that stale drafts are deleted after six months. So, if you are a good faith editor who works slowly, your personal sandbox space is best. I have been editing since long before draft space was created, so I use sandbox space instead, with no problems. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 08:31, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

The only other consideration I can think of, Dr Salvus, is that using the draft space might be easier for a collaborative effort, if you can identify other editors who might wish to chip in at the early stage of article creation. You can find such potential collaborators via WP:WikiProject Council/Directory, for example. Mike Turnbull (talk) 14:34, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

Portal:Countries missing

In Portal:Countries, there is country missing, Ethiopia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 196.188.241.107 (talk) 09:03, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

The Ethiopian flag is missing from the list because the Ethiopia "portal" was deleted after this discussion. -- John of Reading (talk) 09:23, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

We have articles about all countries but around 60 countries don't have a portal, e.g. Algeria, Angola, Ghana, Mongolia, Mozambique, Myanmar, Sudan, Yemen. Portals are not meant to be exhaustive. They require volunteer editors to create and maintain them. This is often done by editors from the country but we have few Ethiopean editors. Ethiopia has the largest population for a country without a portal. PrimeHunter (talk) 09:36, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

How can Wikipedia support flat out slander.

User Gorilla Warfare has flat out slandered the Parler community with lies and dishonesty and allowed to lock these lies so they can't be edited in her post https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parler — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:100A:B10A:4E34:742A:ECA4:74AD:4C77 (talk) 09:49, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

Wikipedia summarizes what independent reliable sources state. Unfortunately, due to disruption of the article, it is protected from editing. If you are interested in civilly discussing your concerns or any ideas you have for changes to Parler that you have independent sources for, please start a discussion on the article talk page. If the sources in the article are being summarized accurately, you will need to discuss your concerns with the sources themselves to get them to issue retractions. If you just want to push right wing talking points, you will have to do that somewhere else. 331dot (talk) 09:52, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

The article seems fair and factual to me. Keep up the good work wikipedians. And if its written down its not slander but libel.-not that this is of course.Spinney Hill (talk) 10:15, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

Columns

Hi all, previously it used to be possible to arrange long lists of things into columns, using templates such as {{columns-list|colwidth=20em}}, {{reflist|20em}}, {{refbegin|20em}} etc. I distinctly remember once sorting List of people from Gloucestershire into 4 columns, although it wasn't popular. Now it seems that none of these tricks work, and everything has been forced into a single column. I find that scrolling through 100 refs and 50 sources at the end of an article is particularly tedious. Could anyone please explain what might have happened? I use ancient Firefox 47 on XP. Is it something to do with mobile? Is it going to stay like this? Cheers, >MinorProphet (talk) 10:34, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

@MinorProphet: The problem is almost certainly the age of your browser; see mw:Compatibility#Browsers. Using Firefox 85.0 on Windows 10, the list at List of people from Gloucestershire reformats itself into one, two or more columns dependent on the width of the window, as do the many references in long articles such as Bill Gates. -- John of Reading (talk) 10:43, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

@MinorProphet: (edit conflict) It depends on the available screen width. List of people from Gloucestershire uses a width of 30em per column. 30em are about 456px on my device, which means that two columns fit into my viewport. Because the number of columns is calculated on the client side depending on the available screen size, I can't give you a definitive way of how to create 4 columns. That being said, Firefox 47 is realy ancient and very likely has known vulnerabilities, the same goes for Windows XP, for which the last regular update was released in 2008 (!). I don't know if Windows XP /Firefox 47 is still secure, but I doubt it. Victor Schmidt (talk) 10:51, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

@John of Reading: and @Victor Schmidt:, thanks very much for your helpful and swift replies. I have a huge wide-screen monitor running at at 1366 x 768. Until relatively recently (a few months ago) I could do a Ctrl+Scroll which produced the desired multi-column effect, but now it doesn't. One day I might upgrade from XP, I am one of the 1% of all PC users that have it. I was in IT for 20 years, but after a stroke 10 years ago anything to do with PCs except using them fills me with dread. Anyway, I have had an intense dislike for all versions of Windows since Vista. I used to be familiar with Linux, maybe I might try installing that, since you can install FF on it. Hmm, now where did I put that spare hard drive...? Cheers, >MinorProphet (talk) 13:21, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

Radiography

1 Hospital occupational standard?

2 hospital wase management ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 196.190.52.219 (talk) 10:47, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

@196.190.52.219: sorry, we only deal with questions about using or editing Wikipedia. Knowledge questions can be asked at the reference desk. Victor Schmidt (talk) 14:05, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

HeroWars

Cannot access my account when playing Hero Wars, I get a grey screen that shows its loading but never open, help — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.231.157.123 (talk) 13:18, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

@64.231.157.123: I am afraid that this help desk only deals with questions about unsing or editing Wikipedia, we cannot Help you with hero wars. The sole support contact form I was able to find is this. Victor Schmidt (talk) 14:05, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

o — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:589:8401:D170:25A8:937E:3EFE:DBC3 (talk) 15:50, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

COVID-19 pandemic index table removal

The index table of COVID-19 pandemic in Wikipedia's main page was moved to Ongoing events. 196.188.241.107 (talk) 16:06, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

There's a long discussion about this at Wikipedia talk:In the news#COVID-19 banner. -- John of Reading (talk) 16:28, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

Hidden text goes wrong

In 2021 New York City mayoral election, there are "results" tables with space for the results of the primary elections, but those elections are several months away, so I tried to comment them out so they would not display at this time, using the <!-- ... --> notation (see Help:Wikitext#Invisible text (comments)). We will need those tables or something similar when the primary occurs, but not before then. However, it didn't work properly (see [5]). Does anyone know what went wrong? I see that there are other uses of <!-- ... --> within the table itself; are embedded uses not allowed? --Metropolitan90 (talk) 16:38, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

@Metropolitan90: I just hid both "Results" sections for you. GoingBatty (talk) 16:49, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

@GoingBatty: Thanks, but it didn't work right. Instead of the table being hidden, it's displaying as a bunch of table code that looks like this:

| |- align=right |style="background-color:#3333FF" | |Democratic |Art Chang | | |- align=right | style="background-color:#3333FF" | |Democratic |Eddie Cullen | | |- ... --Metropolitan90 (talk) 20:53, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

--> ends a comment no matter how many <!-- have been encountered. <includeonly>...</includeonly> could be used instead. PrimeHunter (talk) 16:54, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

Categorisation question

A further question about Vyborg railway station (1913). Does it belong in Category:Former buildings and structures in Finland or in Category:Former buildings and structures in Russia?

The background for this is:

• The station was built in 1913, when Finland was an autonomous Grand Duchy of Finland, not yet independent.
• The station was part of independent Finland for 24 years from 1917 to 1941.
• The station was destroyed in 1941 by Soviet troops. It doesn't exist any more. At that time it was still in independent Finland.
• Vyborg itself was ceded to the Soviet Union as part of their demands after the Continuation War had ended.
• Vyborg remains in Russia to this day. Russia has never had any intention of returning it.

So is this a former building in Finland or a former building in Russia? JIP | Talk 17:41, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

Can't it be both? Schrödinger's railway station? MinorProphet (talk) 18:34, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

I would say both too, so long as Russia includes the Russian Empire. Communist Russia is just a Red herring. Clarityfiend (talk) 23:31, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

OK, so I added it to Category:Former buildings and structures in Russia. But I don't think it should go to Category:Demolished buildings and structures in Russia as it was not demolished, it was destroyed. JIP | Talk 23:42, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

Is it okay if references on a article aren’t archived?

I’m a little confused like do references ever expire? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikieditor6557 (talk • contribs) 17:44, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

• Physical references such as books and newspapers don't expire. Online references might, as websites can be taken down. That's why there is the Internet Archive which preserves copies of expired websites. JIP | Talk 17:48, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

Another option for creating an archive of an online source is archive.today. I use it when the Internet Archive isn't able to save a copy of a source. Eddie Blick (talk) 02:26, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

Marked a small content edit as minor. Can the "minor" tag be removed?

I opened an account to make an edit to a page to add a quantity that was missing. It seemed minor to me, so I marked it as such. Afterwards, I read the definition of Minor Edit on the wiki and find that since I added content, it was not minor. When I look at the "History" page, I don't see a way to alter my edit comments. Is there a way for me to edit my revision category to correctly label it as a standard edit? — Preceding unsigned comment added by FCwikiEdit (talk • contribs) 20:14, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

@FCwikiEdit: There is no way to undo the "minor" tagging after you saved the edit. An alternative procedure is described in the 4th bullet point in Help:Minor_edit#Things_to_remember. Victor Schmidt (talk) 20:30, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

Recently created page not shown in Google search

I realize that Google is separate from Wikipedia, but this is a query about how they interface. The BLP page Yaniv Iczkovits was created as a draft on 11 January and moved to article mainspace on 26 January. Its Wikidata item was created in March 2013, and there's an earlier article in the Hebrew Wikipedia. Searching the name in Google in Hebrew displays the Hebrew Wikipedia link, but still nothing appears in Google when searching the name in English. What will change the latter outcome? -- Deborahjay (talk) 20:45, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

@Deborahjay: Patience ;-) All new mainspace pages, no matter if they went through AfC, are noindexed until they either 1) they are marked as patrolled by the Wikipedia:New pages patrol folks or 2) they have been in mainspace for 90 days (whichever comes first). And even when Googlebot finally is allowed to index the page, it still takes him some time (up to a few hours) to notice that he is now allowed to do so. Victor Schmidt (talk) 21:19, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

January 31

Why does wikipedia support having an encyclopedia use definitions that do not align with their past articles?

React (web framework) is by definition not a web framework. "many web frameworks provide libraries for database access, templating frameworks, and session management, and they often promote code reuse.[1] Although they often target development of dynamic web sites, they are also applicable to static websites.[2]" - Web framework ?

There are also under Framework: Software framework, a reusable set of libraries or classes for a software system or subsystem Web framework, for development of dynamic websites, web applications, and web services

List of JavaScript libraries would also suggest that React should be listed under "DOM (manipulation) oriented" section by the tool's use case.

There seems to be no supporting documentation to suggest that React is in fact a framework, let alone a Web framework. It could be considered a library for DOM manipulation and would fit with the "a well-defined interface by which the behavior is invoked" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Library_(computing) definition.

However React could not be compared to .NET Framework Spring Framework or Next.js or Sails.js ?

React on it's own can only build a single page HTML webpage; however, does not offer a framework (by wikipedia nor academia definitions) for providing development of dynamic websites, such as serving webpages or routing addresses.

It would seem harmful to continue to have React listed as a web framework, let alone a framework by wikipedia's own definitions. Does this seem to be the cases? If not, why is React a Web Framework?

Thank you for your time — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2604:3D09:887D:CCF0:B4BE:87AF:6630:13E6 (talk) 08:06, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

Wikipedia summarizes what independent reliable sources state. If those sources are being summarized inaccurately, or you have your own independent reliable sources with missing or improved information, please offer them on the relevant article talk pages. 331dot (talk) 08:22, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

Wikipedia summarizes what independent reliable sources state, if that is the case why are their definitions not aligning? Seems dangerous without updating the priorly mentioned documents. So how is their contributions being accepted when they contradict the currently accepted independent reliable sources? If there is no continuity on their use of internal wiki citations why is that not an option to report for at least lacking continuity between reference utilization? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jsframeworkdev (talk • contribs) 08:36, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

Jsframeworkdev Wikipedia does not have a single authority to "report" things to- as I said, you may discuss your concerns on the relevant article talk page. If reliable sources disagree as to something, then the community should determine how to best summarize them, giving due weight to the proportion of sources that offer particular viewpoints. 331dot (talk) 08:40, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

Do not move or rename a page by copying/pasting its content, use Wikipedia:Requested moves if you want another title, this one was decided at Talk:React (web framework)#Requested move 9 August 2019. PrimeHunter (talk) 10:22, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

@Jsframeworkdev: English evolves, and techno-English evolves at a dizzy pace. Editors generally use the terminology used by their sources, so when a term's definition changes or is used differently by different sources, Wikipedia cannot easily maintain consistent definitions across all of the affected articles. This is further complicated by the global nature of the English Wikipedia, where the same term means different things in different places. See supercomputer and SUV as examples of change over time and in different countries. In some cases it is useful to explain the differences in the article most associated with the term, and then explain the precise intended definition in any article that needs precision that uses the term. -Arch dude (talk) 17:43, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

Editing Attempt to Christine Lahti's Article

OOOPs! Sorry, I confess that I do not know how to edit correctly. I was in no way trying to vandalize Ms. Lahti's sight. I saw the play back in 1988 with her and Christopher Reeve, and I noticed it was not mentioned in her theater credits. I'll admit I did a botched attempt at editing to include the play Summer and Smoke. I'll take your advice and practice in search box. Again with my apologies, Leo A. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:203:580:B8E0:B5A9:E1C6:D0D8:F4D (talk) 09:29, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

It's called the sandbox. You can also use the "Show preview" button to check how your edit will look if you save it. PrimeHunter (talk) 09:40, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

Enable dark mode on wikipedia

How to enable it — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.181.116.105 (talk) 10:13, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

If you have an account, you can add a mod like Volker E. (WMF)/dark-mode. Alternately, the mobile app has light, dark, black, and sepia themes, logged-in or not. Otherwise, I fear you may be SOL (Sadly Out of Luck). :( — Pelagic ( messages ) – (23:20 Sun 31, AEDT) 12:20, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

That link presumably meant to go to User:Volker E. (WMF)/dark-mode. Victor Schmidt (talk) 14:02, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

Account gone

Hi our account has gone missing — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A00:23C6:BB00:C401:619E:9220:B73C:1139 (talk) 12:29, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

Accounts are for individuals only, not groups. If you are unable to log in to your account and cannot remember or recover the login information, your only recourse is to create a new account. 331dot (talk) 13:49, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

hanoldclaqueyu

hanoldclaqueyu — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hanold claqueyu (talk • contribs) 12:42, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

hanoldclaqueyu — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hanold claqueyu (talk • contribs) 12:42, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

@Hanold claqueyu: Do you have a question about how to use or edit Wikipedia? Also, you have added a similar section at the teahouse. Eagleash (talk) 12:52, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

Film release year wrong

Regarding Bordertown (2006 film). Both IMDb and Rottentomatoes give 2007 as release year. Title should be fixed I think. Aquatic Ambiance (talk) 12:49, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

@Aquatic Ambiance: Please discuss at the article talk page. Thank you. Eagleash (talk) 14:15, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

@Eagleash: I did but no one is responding. Aquatic Ambiance (talk) 15:23, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

@Aquatic Ambiance: It might take a few days before someone responds. GoingBatty (talk) 15:34, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

(edit conflict) @Aquatic Ambiance: It's been less than an hour so far; you could escalate the discussion by proposing a move and then give it at least a week; then if there has been no input, make the move yourself, adding an explanatory note in the discussion you started at the talk page. Having said that, I do not know if there's any convention as to whether the year of filming or the release date is conventionally used. Cheers. Eagleash (talk) 15:43, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

@Aquatic Ambiance: Wikipedia:Naming conventions (films)#Between films of the same name says: "add the year of its first verifiable release (including film festival screenings)". I have investigated it carefully, added [6] a good Reuters source [7] from the 2007 premiere, and moved it [8] to Bordertown (2007 film) with a detailed summary: "Correct year. It was once scheduled for 2006, some poor sources claim that year but many reliable sources from the time say 2007 Berlinale was the premiere. No good source found for 2006". The Google search Bordertown premiere 2007 Berlin finds many good sources. PrimeHunter (talk) 19:36, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

@PrimeHunter: Thank you! Only thing left now is the deletion of Bordertown (2006 film). Aquatic Ambiance (talk) 19:52, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

@Aquatic Ambiance: That should only be considered if Special:WhatLinksHere/Bordertown (2006 film) shows no articles. I have updated two navigation templates but the change hasn't propagated to all the articles yet, and some articles link it in their own source. We usually keep redirects after moves, and some sources do claim 2006 so users may use that year in searches for it. I have added {{R from incorrect title}} to it. This means Wikipedia:Moving a page#Moving over a redirect would now require an administrator, reducing the risk of another wrong move like [9]. PrimeHunter (talk) 20:13, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

Drawings of old buildings from the United States

There are many old drawings for Lowell Observatory, here is one of them:
File:Lowell Observatory, Clark Dome, 1400 West Mars Road, Flagstaff, Coconino County, AZ HABS ARIZ,3-FLAG,1B- (sheet 2 of 4).tif
And for Griffith Observatory and for Lick Observatory and for Fallingwater I never got the drawings from Historic American Buildings Survey :-(
Can anyone find and upload drawings of the Griffith Observatory, Lick Observatory, and Fallingwater to Wikimedia Commons? — LibreOffice User ( messages ) – 13:18, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

@LibreOffice User: You may want to ask for assistance at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject National Register of Historic Places. Happy editing! GoingBatty (talk) 15:00, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

@GoingBatty: Thank you — LibreOffice User ( messages ) – 15:24, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

The Founding Date of NOAA

I think the date you have for the founding is incorrect, the founding date for NOAA is Feb. 9th 1970, by President Richard Nixxon. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.81.40.95 (talk) 13:52, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

Are there any reliable sources that can corroborate this claim? —Tenryuu 🐲 ( 💬 • 📝 ) 13:59, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

The October 3, 1970 date is well cited and explained. 331dot (talk) 14:03, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

WP:BE BOLD and edit it yourself directly! None of us are paid, we're all WP:VOLUNTEER's. ~ Shushugah (talk) 22:29, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

@Shushugah: Most "corrections" posted to our help pages are wrong. Don't encourage posters with unsourced claims to edit against well cited statements in our articles. The article source at National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration#History is [10] from the official website. It says: "Effective October 3, 1970 ... There is hereby established in the Department of Commerce an agency which shall be known as the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration". PrimeHunter (talk) 23:05, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

Hi

Hi all! I am user CoryGlee days been since I am hospitalised with COVID-19. I was today given my cellphone. Improving. My question is, I miss tremendously editing what tool serves the purpose on cellphone Samsung Galaxy to edit? Thanks and take care. These days served me to know how much I appreciate everysingle one of you without exception. 186.143.198.12 (talk) 14:28, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

Have you tried using the Wikipedia App? Get well soon! GoingBatty (talk) 14:58, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

Hello! Thank you for your good wishes. No I had never heard of it before. Checking it right now. If an app, hope my cellphone supports it. Cheers! 186.143.198.12 (talk) 15:08, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

Cory, will your hospital let you use a laptop? We can figure out a way to get one to you. -Arch dude (talk) 16:38, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

Arch dude oh my God thank you so much I am in the Republic of Argentina. I do have one... indeed that is my only computer but the parishioner (is that the word in English) will first check with the team of doctors because of all the apparatuses around me. Does it bother you if I keep you updated? 186.143.198.12 (talk) 17:09, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

I hope you will be able to use it. Electrically and electronically, it almost certainly poses less total risk than your cell phone. Physically, it may get in the way more. If the hospital does not provide WIFI, you will probably need to "tether" the laptop to your phone so the phone provides internet access for the laptop. Please keep us posted, we can share your joys and frustrations even if we cannot help you any other way. This is only slightly beyond the remit of the help desk: we are after all trying to help you edit Wikipedia. However, feel free to use my user talk page if this conversation becomes extensive. -Arch dude (talk) 17:30, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

The Computing reference desk may also be able to help with technical questions. Seagull123 Φ 18:00, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

In case you don't know, the bottom of pages in the mobile version have a "Desktop" link to switch to the desktop version of the site. Many editors prefer it even on a small smartphone screen. PrimeHunter (talk) 18:04, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

To all kind people who responded to me, I will try my best with my devices because i am an idiot, a stupid and useless individual when it comes to technology... if my saturation of oxygen in blood remains stable I am sent home Tuesday according to Dr who told me minutes ago now 4.28pm Argentina time. I love you ALL. 186.141.134.249 (talk) 19:28, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

User:Cullen328/Smartphone editing may have something helpful. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 09:49, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

Find transclusions of a template selected by number of parameters

Is there a way to find the transclusions of a template with a specific number of parameters? Case in question: I would like to find the transclusions of Template:For with exactly one parameter. --KnightMove (talk) 15:14, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

This search?

—Trappist the monk (talk) 15:32, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

Thank you! --KnightMove (talk) 16:05, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

Resolved

Handball notability

Is there any notability guidelines on handball players? I wanted to make the players for the 2021 World Men's Handball Championship but I cannot find notability guidelines for handball. Thanks. Kline | vroom vroom 20:28, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

@Kline: I don't think there are any specifically for handball players (the only mention I could find of "handball" at Wikipedia:Notability (sports) was about Gaelic handball). So I would suggest that WP:SPORTBASIC and WP:GNG would be useful guidelines here. There have, however, been some discussions in the talk pages of that notability guideline here: Wikipedia talk:Notability (sports)/Archive 32#Handball, Wikipedia talk:Notability (sports)/Archive 24#Handball, Wikipedia talk:Notability (sports)/Archive 25#Handball criteria, Wikipedia talk:Notability (sports)/Archive 28#Handball - these may be of interest to you as well. Seagull123 Φ 20:41, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

@Seagull123: This was actually pretty useful! Seems like what most people propose I'd be able to make the articles (as long as I pass WP:GNG). Thanks! Kline | vroom vroom 20:48, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

Stylized in...

Twice in the last few days, I've seen articles that contain intro text that reads something like "Stylized in all caps" or whatever. The two examples are Sophie (musician) and Drivers license (song) with all caps and all lower case, respectively. The articles don't make any effort to actually use that style. Yet the article for eBay which is stylized with a lower initial letter uses that lower initial letter throughout the article. Why is there a discrepancy? Is the rule not hard and fast? †dismas†|^(talk) 22:04, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

@Dismas: See Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Trademarks#Indicating stylizations. PrimeHunter (talk) 22:11, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

Dismas I went ahead and added the stylizations into the lead text, but yeah what PrimeHunter linked to. Fredlesaltique (talk) 01:27, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

Thank you, both. †dismas†|^(talk) 12:08, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

February 1

IP address and User name

After creating new articles and editing I have noticed that published not by my User name, IP address was placed. How to change it? IL68 (talk) 05:10, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

@IL68: Unfortunately, once you have published your edit, you cannot change it from your IP address to your username. GoingBatty (talk) 05:15, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

IL68, double-check and make sure you've allowed cookies for Wikipedia so that you're not inadvertently logged out. You can also send an email to WP:OVERSIGHT to ask that a particular revision be deleted (i.e., make the diff unviewable to non-admins). —Tenryuu 🐲 ( 💬 • 📝 ) 05:26, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

@IL68: You can ask for the IP address to be hidden. The revisions don't have to be deleted. PrimeHunter (talk) 08:40, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

Company Infobox bug - changes to source code not reflected on published page

I've updated the James Villa Holidays page (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Villa_Holidays) to remove 'parent - Wyndham Destinations' from the company infobox and this has not been reflected on the published page. The infobox is also showing elements which are not included in the source code... I cannot find a way to address this. Is it a bug or can someone help??

Thanks in advance! - — Preceding unsigned comment added by KLC JVH (talk • contribs) 09:34, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

It's being pulled from Wikidata, something which can be easily fixed. But more importantly, your user name suggests that you are affiliated to James Villa Holidays in some way. Wikipedia has important rules regarding that and potential conflict of interests, please read WP:COI, also you MUST adhere to WP:PAID if it applies to you. - X201 (talk) 09:40, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

Campaignbox state collapsed

On the page Rohingya genocide, I've added a campaign box (a navbox that goes at the top of an article, this one is on the right below the infobox and is called "Internal conflict in Myanmar"). Anyway, I added "|state=plain" to it, but it is still auto collapsing for me on Chrome, 1080p. Any tips for getting this to default to not collapsed? Please ping me in replies. Thanks. –Novem Linguae (talk) 11:47, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

@Novem Linguae: I have passed on the state parameter so your |state=plain has effect.[11] Will you modify your signature to use spaces instead of underscores in the piped links? It doesn't affect rendering but is a little distracting in the source. PrimeHunter (talk) 12:34, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for fixing the template, the fix works great. I did the suggested signature tweak, should be all set. Thanks for your help. –Novem Linguae (talk) 12:55, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

Wikipedia skin?

So, I changed my skins under preferences just to experiment, before going back to Vector, with Legacy Vector activated. However, now there are subtle changes, most notably, in the top right corner, there is a clock to the right of the log out button. If I have to learn to live with it, that's fine, but does anyone know if there is a way to revert back to what I had before? Do other people see clocks or is this a paranoid delusion? ‡ Єl Cid of Valencia ^talk 13:35, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

@El cid, el campeador: That is at Special:Preferences#mw-prefsection-gadgets: "Add a clock to the personal toolbar that displays the current time in UTC and provides a link to purge the current page". PrimeHunter (talk) 13:47, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

Thank you!! Actually, all of the changes I noticed were under that section. Strange. Much appreciated ‡ Єl Cid of Valencia ^talk 13:59, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

Reporting disruption

Can you revert this edit by ItsLife1 because of too disrupted with template and boldy fonts. The Supermind (talk) 14:27, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

Nonprofit organization disclose COI

Hello!

I am writing a Wikipedia page for a nonprofit organization I volunteer at. I checked the requirements and we fit them regarding the amount of credible sources.

I am wondering if I need to disclose that I volunteer there? Is it a conflict of interest? I will be sure to remain objective and keep a neutral tone about what we do.

Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by WikiSpitfire (talk • contribs) 16:02, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

WikiSpitfire If the organization compensates you in any way(be it money or something else), that falls under the paid editing policy. If you are just a volunteer for the organization, yes, it would be a conflict of interest that you should disclose, especially if you were asked to write an article(not just a mere "page") about this organization.

Please keep in mind that a Wikipedia article about your organization should summarize what independent reliable sources with significant coverage have chosen on their own to say about it, showing how it meets the special Wikipedia definition of a notable organization. Press releases, interviews, announcements of routine activities, and the organization website, all are not acceptable for establishing notability. Wikipedia is interested in what others say about the organization, not what it says about itself. 331dot (talk) 16:14, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

(edit conflict)Hi @WikiSpitfire: I would say that you should disclose that you volunteer there. It can be on your user page as you have done here: just a simple message that you volunteer at a nonprofit, and use the {{UserboxCOI}} template, just so other editors can see your connection to it. If you need more help with COI editing, some pages that may be of interest to you are: Wikipedia:Help available for editors with conflicts of interest and Wikipedia:Plain and simple conflict of interest guide. Also, if you want to write an article about that organisation, I suggest first reading Help:Your first article, and then using the Article Wizard to write it. Seagull123 Φ 16:18, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

Infobox image

I've just created Grands Goulets but can't get File:Grands Goulets.jpg to display. Help! Alansplodge (talk) 16:09, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

Alansplodge Fixed, you had the image as Grands Goulets.pjg not Grands Goulets.jpg. Joseph2302 (talk) 16:13, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

D'oh! Thank you most kindly. Alansplodge (talk) 16:14, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

Resolved