Jump to content

Anti-statism

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Creagh~enwiki (talk | contribs) at 21:58, 13 January 2007. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Anti-statism refers to opposition to state intervention into personal, social or economic affairs. Anti-statist views may reject the state completely and immediately, they may wish to reduce the size and scope of the state to a minimum (e.g. minarchism), or they may advocate a stateless society as the ultimate goal of a gradual or step-by-step evolution (e.g. Marxism). Henry David Thoreau expressed this evolutionary anti-statist view in his essay "Civil Disobedience:"

I heartily accept the motto,—"That government is best which governs least"; and I should like to see it acted up to more rapidly and systematically. Carried out, it finally amounts to this, which also I believe,—"That government is best which governs not at all"; and when men and women are prepared for it, that will be the kind of government which they will have.[1]

General categories

Radical anti-statists differ greatly according to the beliefs they hold in addition to anti-statism. Thus the categories of anti-statist thought are sometimes classified as collectivist or individualist. Interpretations of the principles of anarchism are often contested between adherents of anarchism who are opposed to private property (such as anarcho-syndicalism and anarchist communism) and individualist who embrace private property in the form of possession (such as mutualism).

Anti-statist philosophies that seek to minimize the role or influence of the state are difficult to delimit. They range from panarchy (states competing in the same territory for patronage, an arrangement hard to distinguish from statelessness) to Marxism and Christian postmillennialism, which envision statelessness in the remote future, to liberalism (or more precisely classical liberalism), which seeks only to reduce, not abolish, the role of the state.

A significant difficulty in determining whether a thinker or philosophy is anti-statist is the problem of defining the state itself. Terminology has changed over time, and past writers often used the word, "state" in a different sense than we use it today. Thus, the anarchist Michael Bakunin used the term simply to mean a governing organization. Other writers used the term "state" to mean any law-making or law-enforcement agency. Karl Marx defined the state as the institution used by the ruling class of a country to maintain the conditions of its rule. According to Max Weber, the state is an organization with an effective monopoly on the use of force in a particular geographic area.

Anti-statist philosophies

Chronology of anti-statist writing

1548Étienne de la Boétie, The Politics of Obedience: The Discourse of Voluntary Servitude
1793William Godwin, An Enquiry Concerning Political Justice
1825Thomas Hodgskin, Labour Defended against the Claims of Capital
1840Pierre Proudhon, What is Property?
1841Josiah Warren, Manifesto
1844Max Stirner, The Ego and Its Own
1848Karl Marx & Frederick Engels, [2]
1849Henry David Thoreau, Civil Disobedience
1849Frédéric Bastiat, The Law
1849Gustave de Molinari, The Production of Security
1851Herbert Spencer, The Right to Ignore the State
1866Michael Bakunin, Revolutionary Catechism
1867Lysander Spooner, No Treason
1886Benjamin Tucker, State Socialism and Anarchism: How far they agree, & wherein they differ
1902Peter Kropotkin, Mutual Aid
1935Albert Jay Nock, Our Enemy, the State
1962Murray Rothbard, Man, Economy & State with Power and Market
2001Kevin A. Carson, The Iron Fist Behind the Invisible Hand

See also