Jump to content

Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by KempeIAGeng (talk | contribs) at 19:33, 25 February 2021. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Main pageTalk pageSubmissions
Category, List, Sorting, Feed		ShowcaseParticipants
Apply, By subject		Reviewing instructions
Help deskBacklog
drives
Shortcuts
Welcome to the Articles for Creation help desk

  • This page is only for questions about article submissions—are you in the right place?
  • Do not provide your email address or other contact details. Answers will be provided on this page.
  • Watch out for scammers! If someone contacts you saying that they can get your draft published for payment, they are trying to scam you. Report such attempts here.
Ask a new question
Please check back often for answers.
Skip to today's questions · Skip to the bottom · Archived discussions


February 19

12:00:25, 19 February 2021 review of submission by Harsh Chadha


Harsh Chadha (talk) 12:00, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Harsh Chadha, what is your question? CommanderWaterford (talk) 12:49, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

14:18:40, 19 February 2021 review of submission by VictoriaKira

Hello! I was really curious that my KiRA MAZUR article was rejected. Kira Mazur is a famous Ukrainian singer who already had an article on the Ukrainian Wikipedia. She writes music all over the world, so many people would like to know more about her. I wrote an article in English to make it more accessible. I am the Head manager of Kira Mazur and I have all the rights to the content and photos. I would be very grateful if you can show my mistakes and point out how to make them perfect for Wikipedia. Thank you in advance! VictoriaKira (talk) 14:18, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

VictoriaKira Please read about conflict of interest and paid editing for information on required formal disclosures you must make.
Your draft was blatant promotion and was deleted. Please read Your first article and the Wikipedia definition of a notable musician. 331dot (talk) 15:15, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

20:17:40, 19 February 2021 review of submission by TEAMTR33

Hey guys I've did some changes and fixed my mistakes and I want you guys to review it again.

I'll appreciate if you review it again.

Thanks... TEAMTR33 (talk) 20:17, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The draft was rejected, meaning it will not be considered further. The draft is completely unsourced. 331dot (talk) 20:43, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

February 20

00:36:42, 20 February 2021 review of submission by Atayibabs


Atayibabs (talk) 00:36, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Atayibabs You don't ask a question, but your draft is a completely unsourced essay, not an encyclopedia article with citations to independent reliable sources. Please learn more about Wikipedia by using the new user tutorial and reading Your First Article. 331dot (talk) 00:40, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

01:53:59, 20 February 2021 review of draft by 45Boomer


I am trying to figure out what needs to be changed on my draft. It is not clear what the issue is I have the correct format with all the references. 45Boomer (talk) 01:53, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your references are bare URLs and should be formatted properly to display full bibliographic details. Please read WP:REFBEGIN. Most of your sources are primary sources or unreliable sources. Far better to have five solid references than dozens of poor quality references that are worthless for establishing notability. If you are claiming that this person is notable as an athlete, then you need to show that he meets the notability guideline that you can find at WP:NGRIDIRON. It does not appear that he does. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 02:10, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

06:22:56, 20 February 2021 review of draft by 174.1.62.129


I need help to edit my article THanks for your hep https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Bahram_Rad

174.1.62.129 (talk) 06:22, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Noone of the sources currently cited are reliable. The "Biography" and "Music Career" sections desperately need better sources, because Wikipedia is not interested in a rerun of the Seigenthaler incident. Victor Schmidt (talk) 06:27, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

08:00:07, 20 February 2021 review of submission by Zacharyb366


Zacharyb366 (talk) 08:00, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I am trying to figure out why my submission was declined. Thank you!

Draft:Zach Broom (Pastor)

Zacharyb366 The reason for the decline is given at the top of your draft, in short, you have not demonstrated that (I assume) you merit a Wikipedia article. None of the sources you offer are significant coverage of you in independent reliable sources, showing how you meet the special Wikipedia definition of a notable person. Please see Your First Article for more information.
Please also be advised of the autobiography policy; while not forbidden, autobiographies are highly discouraged, in part because people naturally write favorably about themselves. In order to succeed at an autobiography(which is rare, but technically possible), you in essence need to forget everything you know about yourself, and only write based on what independent reliable sources say about you. Most people have great difficulty doing that. 331dot (talk) 09:57, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


12:48:40, 20 February 2021 review of draft by Deppman


The Draft Thermofractal we rejected because an older version is still active. I would like to delete the older version, but I don't know how to do it.

Deppman (talk) 12:48, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deppman, done. I removed the older copy. CommanderWaterford (talk) 13:13, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

16:38:20, 20 February 2021 review of submission by Mathematicalinstitutes


Mathematicalinstitutes (talk) 16:38, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You don't ask a question, but your draft was rejected, meaning that it will not be considered further. 331dot (talk) 16:43, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
It has zero reliable independent sources and Google searches are not sources.Theroadislong (talk) 16:45, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

February 21

00:58:54, 21 February 2021 review of submission by MirachBeta


Hello,

I'm a new editor who recently had the page Carl A. Rouse accepted. However, it seems as though it was originally rejected for not having sources from when the subject was living, among other issues. While I appreciate the fact my article was accepted, could someone clarify to me why it was accepted?

Best,

MirachBeta

MirachBeta (talk) 00:58, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

MirachBeta Would you rather it not have been accepted? ;) You may wish to ask the reviewer directly. but reviewers accept drafts as long as it seems that the draft would survive an Articles for Deletion discussion. Usually that means there are adequate sources to establish notability and sustain the article's content(usually a minimum of three sources). 331dot (talk) 01:01, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
331dot Oh no, I'm glad it was accepted! Just wanted clarification for future reference. Thank you for your help!— Preceding unsigned comment added by MirachBeta (talk • contribs)

04:11:38, 21 February 2021 review of submission by 125.161.183.180


125.161.183.180 (talk) 04:11, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only edit from this IP, could you please link to the draft? Also, it would be nice for the respondees here if you would specify what speficially is your question/problem, or what you need help with. Victor Schmidt (talk) 07:59, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

08:14:09, 21 February 2021 review of submission by Akarniel

Hello,

I understand the reason for the decline of my Draft "Draft:Shlomo Laufer" - the existence of Hebrew in the text. I will translate the titles into the publication list. Also, I will add links to some of the texts that were already translated. I have two questions:

1. Is it ok to discuss a book that is being translated, but was not published yet?

2. When I add a reference to a Hebrew source (unfortunately most of my references, not all of them though), the text in the reference section is automatically adding Hebrew descriptions, which I can't change/translate. Is this approved? or should I remove all of the Hebrew sites references? I am afraid that without them the references will not be sufficient to allow you to verify it. Note that most of these references have been verified by the Wikipedia Hebrew team and are part of the Hebrew article about Shlomo Laufer.

Awaiting your response, Best regards, Amihai Karniel.


Akarniel (talk) 08:14, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 08:43:59, 21 February 2021 for assistance on AfC submission by Mondayudowong


My draft was declined by a reviewer and the reason left by the author was, "Undefined". They was no reason for the decline. They believe I created a new account in order to recreate articles which were once deleted in the past. This is not true. Can someone please look into this? Before submitting my draft, I reviewed other similar topics and I made sure mine followed the same pattern. Thanks in advance.

Mondayudowong (talk) 08:43, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I think the "undefined" simply means that the reviewer did not input the reason into the template. Pinging the reviewer, Celestina007. 331dot (talk) 08:59, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@331dot:, the issue seem to be far more grave, looks like the reviewer is suspecting a Sockpuppet, have a look over here [1]. CommanderWaterford (talk) 14:07, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@331dot, thanks for pinging me, I probably should have left a reason for the decline so as to avoid scenario's such as this. Celestina007 (talk) 16:09, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Celestina007. My account is not a Sock Puppet account. Is there a way I can prove this in order to get my draft approved?

Mondayudowong (talk) 17:34, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

17:01:57, 21 February 2021 review of submission by 2A00:23C7:5A9C:3F01:8184:CA53:61E1:2C38


Paper.io doesn't have that much notability. That explains why there isn't a lot of references. However it is relatively popular. Note I play this game so these are in my words. This reads like an advertisement, though I wanted to seperate everything so it would be easy to understand more.

2A00:23C7:5A9C:3F01:8184:CA53:61E1:2C38 (talk) 17:01, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 18:53:14, 21 February 2021 for assistance on AfC submission by Fahdaltaf


Hi, i want to add Al Haaj Bundoo Khan Restaurant in wikipedia, because its very old and famous Restaurant in pakistan. Al Haaj bundoo khan started his journey from a cart in 1948 and now its the Pakistan best BBQ Restaurant. Al Haaj Bundoo Khan is the one who inteoduce the dish Chicken Tikka and now famous in Al our the world, also he introduced the concept of roll paratha in terms of his famous kabab partha (behari kabab and paratha). I have no clear idea how to present the information which is according to wiki guideline, if some one helps me to publish this article i will be thankful. Secondly i tried ro add the external links of blogger reviews, local news blogs which are famous in local countries pakistan and united arab emirates. And i also added the Gulf News article about Al Haaj bundoo khan. National geographic Abu dhabi also cover Alhaaj bundoo khan in one of his documentry but i didn't find the video link, i have one image from that documentary.


If some one is setup all these things in proper manner so the article will approved on wiki pedia i will be very thankfull to him. Whatever helping material is required i will provide him

Fahdaltaf (talk) 18:53, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Article supported with reliable references including zaman newspaper and many others

21:52:02, 21 February 2021 review of submission by Ameermarkolmaza


Ameermarkolmaza (talk) 21:52, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ameermarkolmaza, what is your question? CommanderWaterford (talk) 22:07, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

23:01:57, 21 February 2021 review of submission by Daunicornengineer

As a part of a project with the African American History Museum, we are working to ensure that notable African Americans in STEM are included in Wikipedia. Numerous sources have been provided in order for this article to be a verifiable source. Daunicornengineer (talk) 23:01, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Daunicornengineer The draft has been rejected, meaning that it will not be considered further. 331dot (talk) 23:16, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


February 22

Request on 00:12:12, 22 February 2021 for assistance on AfC submission by 38.132.215.49


The film Operation Odessa is currently playing on Netflix. I tried to look it up and got redirected to some Manga site - not cool.

I made a start on fixing it. Wouldn't take much more to get a basic page up. Maybe someone could fix it? I've done my bit to try and set it right and am done.

38.132.215.49 (talk) 00:12, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

While it is always possible, I doubt any other editor will pick your draft up. It's a positive start but requires referencing. If you wish to go back to it please ask for the help you need Fiddle Faddle 16:34, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

06:44:15, 22 February 2021 review of submission by Lkcitycliff


Lkcitycliff (talk) 06:44, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I want to create an article from wikipedia editors? I will give the title of the business and want to create a page. I need the help of editors to complete the article. Please write an article for me.

@Lkcitycliff: Hello Lkcitycliff, I think you are looking for WP:Requested articles. It has a large backlog Though... If this refers to a specific draft, please provide a link. Victor Schmidt (talk) 14:38, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

15:46:35, 22 February 2021 review of submission by Finna fly

because this is for a friend and im ready for review Finna fly (talk) 15:46, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Finna fly, first, please do not write articles "for a friend". Please see WP:COI. Second, this draft has been rejected and thus will not be considered further Fiddle Faddle 16:20, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 15:59:42, 22 February 2021 for assistance on AfC submission by 76.240.112.154


I added footnotes and don't understand why this is being declined. All proper footnotes were added

76.240.112.154 (talk) 15:59, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

no Declined I have conducted a further review and left what I hope are helpful comments on your draft Fiddle Faddle 16:28, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

16:21:14, 22 February 2021 review of draft by Bbarmadillo


Please give your opinion on the page. It is a properly stated WP:COI contribution, that I fully reworked after the initial decline. Do you see any issues with the page that need to be fixed? Is the existing redirect a problem? --Bbarmadillo (talk) 16:21, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Bbarmadillo (talk) 16:21, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Bbarmadillo, Thank you for submitting it for review. It will now take its place in the pool of drafts for review. A redirect will not present a problem Fiddle Faddle 16:49, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
While awaiting review do, please, continue to enhance the draft. Submission does not freeze the draft Fiddle Faddle 16:50, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Timtrent: thank you. --Bbarmadillo (talk) 19:32, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

17:06:36, 22 February 2021 review of draft by Engblu


Hi, firstly excuse my lack of experience in the procedure for asking for help. I am trying to edit a page that has been reviewed. It states in the review that the "Comment: There are a lot of unsourced statements". I have used links from mainly two sites having seen many other pages on persons who are Music producers or have similar roles. I am confused as to why these link sources are not applicable or not valid. The information the sites has been indeed verified by the sites and cross checked with the releases mentioned. This may seem obvious to editors but to myself if i could ask for an explanation and some help then on securing exactly what is required. Not everyone is mentioned in published books as to me that seems to be what is required. If a much simpler page / entry would be acceptable then please let me know. Also I do not know where a replay to this inquiry might "appear" ? maybe on my "talk" page ? Many thanks Engblu.

Engblu (talk) 17:06, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Engblu, The answer appears here. Are you associated professionally or personally with Mr Lyon? if so you must declare it. Please see WP:COI and/or WP:PAID. Even if closely associated with, or even being Mr Lyon you are entitled to create and edit the draft on the gentleman.
To understand more about references you may find that reading WP:42 and WP:THREE help.
Your objective is to assert and verify that the gentleman is notable in a Wikipedia sense.
This means that he must not just be a decent chap doing his job well, but that there must be an almost indefinable extra element to him.
There's a lot to read here, so please ask again after you've read and digested the advice and started to put it into practice Fiddle Faddle 22:42, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
For reasons I am not entirely sure I understand, this conversation has been replicated on my talk page by an IP editor, with further comment. I've answered it there, and I invite others who may be able to assist to join in there Fiddle Faddle 17:56, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

18:30:49, 22 February 2021 review of submission by Monir1975

 Fixed Hi, This article was declined due to not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. I have added further references, are those enough to resubmit for futther review?

Monir1975, it was not only declined, it was also rejected and thus will not be considered further. CommanderWaterford (talk) 22:20, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Monir1975 (talk) 18:30, 22 February 2021 (UTC) == 18:30:49, 22 February 2021 review of draft by Monir1975 ==}}[reply]

18:34:26, 22 February 2021 review of submission by Sohil Mandal


Sohil Mandal (talk) 18:34, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sohil Mandal, what is your question? CommanderWaterford (talk) 22:15, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 19:34:15, 22 February 2021 for assistance on AfC submission by Nynewsguy


I'm requesting assistance with understanding the citations I have which were deemed "unreliable." I've cited CBS News, IMDB and AdWeek among others.

I've now noticed that the page in question - Len Tepper - has now been scraped and copied to wikitia too, presumably "verified" by their "editors."

I'm happy to revise as needed. But I need more to go on as to why these sources - that exist as citations on countless other wikipedia pages - are not considered reliable now.

Thank you for any help you can provide. Thom Craver

Nynewsguy (talk) 19:34, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

IMDB is not considered a reliable source because it is user-editable. The "NBC News" section needs a few sources, compare WP:BLP. Victor Schmidt (talk) 21:01, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 21:38:42, 22 February 2021 for assistance on AfC submission by Antiquatuss


Dear Wikipeadia Master Minds, please have a look at the "Fiber Patch Placement" draft and corresponding discussions. I understood, regulatories differ, but i tried my best to redesign the article as I understood your rules and I perfectly cannot understand, why this is completely ignored. I really believe, a new additive manufacturing technology should be mentioned. Thank you in advance for your help! Antiquatuss (talk) 21:38, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Antiquatuss (talk) 21:38, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Antiquatuss, I have added a source from the European Space Agency that includes a definition of fiber patch placement and passed the review so it is now in mainspace under Fiber Patch Placement. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 13:54, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

23:39:00, 22 February 2021 review of submission by AshleyDBuck


Removed marketing jargon Removed KGP Films Provided additional adequate resources And note there is no financial or connection with the subject. A big fan of her work and Narcoleap.

AshleyDBuck (talk) 23:39, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


23:46:29, 22 February 2021 review of submission by AshleyDBuck


Revised the page by removing marketing jargon and a second subject. Please note there is no financial or other connection with the author and subject. Fan of subjects work.

AshleyDBuck (talk) 23:46, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AshleyDBuck, I have tidied up the article a little bit and accepted the submission, though further work is required and a search for sources has been made difficult by the more famous British shadow cabinet minister with the same name. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 23:53, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

February 23

08:24:34, 23 February 2021 review of submission by Derekt0729

You don't ask a question. 331dot (talk) 08:30, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I am not sure why this article was declined. Could you please advise the specific problems that I should make improvement? Derekt0729 (talk) 08:24, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above comment was posted by an IP address, if you are Derekt0729, remember to log in before posting. 331dot (talk) 09:18, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The draft just tells about the company and appears to be sourced to press releases or announcements of routine business transactions. Wikipedia articles must do more, they must summarize what independent reliable sources with significant coverage have chosen on their own to say about a company, showing how it meets the special Wikipedia definition of a notable company. Press releases, routine announcements of business transactions, staff interviews, or other primary sources do not establish notability.
If you work for this company, please review conflict of interest and paid editing for information on required formal disclosures you must make. 331dot (talk) 09:20, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

11:08:54, 23 February 2021 review of submission by Boli12345


Boli12345 (talk) 11:08, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Boli12345: Please do not copy text from elsewhere onto Wikipedia. In my experience, 99% of the texts not written speficially for WIkipedia are also unsiutable for Wikipedia. When writing Wikipedia articles, please make sure that you write in your own words, based on what reliable sources unconnected with the subject have choosen to write about a particuler topic, without interpreting or connecting sources. Victor Schmidt (talk) 12:11, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

13:15:32, 23 February 2021 review of submission by Moli1234


Moli1234 (talk) 13:15, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Moli1234, what is your question? CommanderWaterford (talk) 17:59, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

16:03:45, 23 February 2021 review of submission by Benarizon

i published an article about someone who had no prior details on Wikipedia. however my article was declined and the page im referred to, as already existing is not accurate! Benarizon (talk) 16:03, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Benarizon: When you created the draft, the other article did not exist. It was created 11 days later and exists at Samuel Nuamah Donkor. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 17:51, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 17:29:01, 23 February 2021 for assistance on AfC submission by Waleayanda


I hereby request assistance in creating the page as having edited it several times without getting it. I believe my request is been granted I will learn from that, as learning is a continuous process.Waleayanda (talk) 17:29, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Waleayanda (talk) 17:29, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Waleayanda, after main having a quick look at your article I would suggest searching for by far your sources especially for the awards you have listed. Please have a look at WP:YFA and of help might also Help:Referencing for beginners. CommanderWaterford (talk) 18:04, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

19:38:33, 23 February 2021 review of draft by Jim Barfly


Hi, I rewrote my article that was previously declined. But I'm not sure if I submitted it correctly. Can I have a little help submitting this article and getting it reviewed?

Thank you.

Jim Barfly (talk) 19:38, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Jim Barfly, sure, looks you still need to resubmit it - there is a Button "Resubmit" on the page, you just need to click it. If you need further help let us know. CommanderWaterford (talk) 20:48, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Jim Barfly: You also need to delete the puffery in the article. Looking at some of the grandiose claims, like that the subject is "successful", family members were "preeminent", the "prestigious" school the subject attended, what he "excelled" at, the irrelevance of "30 plus Grammy winning" in re: his concert production, it would almost seem that the subject is writing this article about himself. If that is the case, that would constitute a conflict of interest, and people with conflicts of interest shouldn't edit articles they are entwined with. As it turns out when people write about themselves or their loved ones, they often find it difficult to be objective, and often get upset when the content they are adding receives criticism or winds up declined. If you have such a conflict, you are strongly discouraged from editing this article. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 22:08, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


February 24

00:23:50, 24 February 2021 review of submission by Gfisk86

How do I declare my connection with the subject I'm writing about? Gfisk86 (talk) 00:23, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Gfisk86 Please review conflict of interest and paid editing for information on how to disclose. 331dot (talk) 00:51, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

07:11:33, 24 February 2021 review of submission by 2407:C00:D003:BB8D:1:1:8C88:E584


2407:C00:D003:BB8D:1:1:8C88:E584 (talk) 07:11, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


08:09:26, 24 February 2021 review of draft by Apos gk


Hi, can someone review my submission? Thanks a lot!!

Apos gk (talk) 08:09, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Apos gk You have submitted your draft and it is pending review. Reviews are conducted by volunteers on their own time, in no particular order. As noted in your submission notice, "This may take 4 months or more, since drafts are reviewed in no specific order. There are 4,710 pending submissions waiting for review." You will need to be patient. 331dot (talk) 10:09, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Apos gk, no Declined with full reasons stated on the draft Fiddle Faddle 19:07, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

09:33:45, 24 February 2021 review of submission by Zenith Banker

Hi my Name Is Zenith Banker. and i am well known photographer and cinematographer in Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India. i just want share my information on Wikipdia. my Work Profie, about project which i have done and all thats all and the given information is 100% authentic. Thank you.Zenith Banker (talk) 09:33, 24 February 2021 (UTC) Zenith Banker (talk) 09:33, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Zenith Banker Wikipedia does not have "profiles". Wikipedia has articles written by independent editors. Wikipedia is not a place for people to tell the world about themselves or their work. Please use social media or other forums where that is permitted. Please review the autobiography policy. 331dot (talk) 10:06, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

12:39:11, 24 February 2021 review of submission by Nigel-harps1954


Question regarding the suitability, or rather notability, of the League of Ireland as a 'fully professional league'? Wondering why this submission has been rejected on these grounds, when in fact, the League of Ireland is a fully professional league.

Why a player who has represented his country internationally, and has played as a full time professional footballer, has this submission been rejected?

Just speaking as someone involved with the club Kosovar Sadiki plays with, he is, in fact, a full time professional footballer, in a professional football team, in a professional football league, that only in the winter past, had a club playing in the Europa League group stages.

What makes this lacking notability, specifcially, in terms of a non-full time professional environment?

Answers would be appreciated. Nigel-harps1954 (talk) 12:39, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nigel-harps1954 If the league is fully professional, you will need to explain that to the reviewer. 331dot (talk) 13:35, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 17:20:39, 24 February 2021 for assistance on AfC submission by BlackholeWA // Inappropriate merge destination


Hi,

I created an article draft last month for the Death of Nóra Quoirin, a pretty major missing persons/unexplained death case in the UK and Malaysia that has seen a lot of diverse coverage over the past few years, especially given the ongoing controversy as to whether her death was the result of foul play. This (and the inclusion of an article on the matter in the Malay wikipedia) seemed grounds to sustain a standalone article here to me, but that's a little besides the point.

The AfC draft I made was declined because the reviewer didn't think there was enough lasting notability, but recommended I merge the content into List of solved missing person cases. I did this, and also populated several redirects about the matter to point to an anchor on that entry. Following this... all the content was promptly deleted by an editor on that list, because it turns out it is in fact a list for cases that already have a corresponding standalone Wikipedia article.

Given the longevity and breadth of coverage of this case, I'm fairly sure at least a paragraph or two of information about it should have a home on the English wikipedia, and it already has coverage on at least one foreign language edition of the site. Personally, I think that a standalone page may be warranted, but, barring that, I would like to merge the content elsewhere. Given that the instructions given by the submission closer recommended merging into an article where the content was inappropriate (and immediately deleted), and that there are now several hanging redirects pointing to a page that doesn't mention their subject, it'd be good to know how to proceed, whether that's a different merge location, or the re-opening of the original draft.

Edit: Tagging in reviewer @Aseleste: . BlackholeWA (talk) 17:28, 24 February 2021 (UTC) BlackholeWA (talk) 17:20, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I will wait for another opinion before commenting. ~ Ase1estecharge-paritytime 06:13, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

17:23:05, 24 February 2021 review of draft by 24.228.70.170


Hi, I'm semi-new to wikipedia. I'd like to write about North New Jersey Record Labels and so far I've been working on Command Records which already existed and Mint 400 Records which is a draft, and eventually I'd like to move onto smaller ones. But Mint 400 it looks like the article can't be approved even after I showed some very significant people like Fountains of Wayne, Frank Iero, Victoria Williams and others connected to them. I've looked at other labels pages and they too are only mentioned in passing in their references. I'm not quite understanding what kind of press validates them if not mentions in major publications like Alternative Press and North NJ newspapers? This label has over 370 releases and I wanted to actually focus on some smaller labels than this one but I'm not sure how that is possible but I see in other states all of their small record labels have pages and they aren't under intense scrutiny and I'm wondering why?

24.228.70.170 (talk) 17:23, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You need substantial independent references. WP:42 will guide you well Fiddle Faddle 18:59, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

17:39:49, 24 February 2021 review of submission by 2A00:23C5:B600:7D01:EC4C:5ABD:CE36:8145


2A00:23C5:B600:7D01:EC4C:5ABD:CE36:8145 (talk) 17:39, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This draft by self declared paid editor MisterTech has been rejected. It will not be considered further. If you are that user please denote edit while logged out, which is seen as gaming the system Fiddle Faddle 18:19, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Nothing to do with me. I have requested draft deletion. MisterTech (talk) 19:51, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

18:39:56, 24 February 2021 review of submission by Sanjaysharma2021


Sanjaysharma2021 (talk) 18:39, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sanjaysharma2021, your draft has been rejected which means it will not be considered further Fiddle Faddle 19:09, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

23:29:22, 24 February 2021 review of submission by DJPoobs

Hi, I have added a lot more information now so its line with other actress and actors at the same level, however I can not find the button to send it for review after the last comment that was added, is that due to the comment

DJPoobs (talk) 23:29, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have added a lot more content, but zero reliable sources, the draft was rejected meaning it won't be considered further. Theroadislong (talk) 08:22, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

February 25

Request on 09:20:20, 25 February 2021 for assistance on AfC submission by SriAmaraneni


I need help to edit my article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:SreedharRaoChennamaneni

Thank You!

Sreedhar Rao (talk) 09:20, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

SriAmaraneni, your article has been rejected, it cannot be resubmitted. CommanderWaterford (talk) 17:02, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

10:19:39, 25 February 2021 review of submission by Stefan Gigliotti

Could anyone please give me a feedback on this either let me know what to do next? That would be much appreciated. Thanks a lot in advance Stefan Gigliotti (talk) 10:19, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Stefan Gigliotti, there is nothing to do next, please be patient, there are more than 4,000 articles waiting for a review, it can take months. CommanderWaterford (talk) 17:00, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

13:12:07, 25 February 2021 review of submission by Theman465

The subject has become very notable over the past months gaining many articles and references of him. He also has gained 30 Thousand social media followers. He is very notable now and definitely qualifies for the article on Wikipedia. Theman465 (talk) 13:12, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The number of social media followers has no bearing whatsoever on notability. Theroadislong (talk) 15:51, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

15:46:11, 25 February 2021 review of submission by Rajeev Kumar Pillai


It is said that its about myself.. my submission is its not about me and its about a different person

Rajeev Kumar Pillai (talk) 15:46, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It also has zero reliable sources so cannot be accepted. Theroadislong (talk) 15:49, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

19:33:35, 25 February 2021 review of draft by KempeIAGeng


Guess, we need help with the entry on Pyroducts. Please explain why the entry has been rejected and what could be made better. If you need more publications cited, that can be mended. Please mark the paragraphs that are found to be faulty and explain why. Before submitting the current text has been reviewed by US volcanologists Dr. J. Lookwood and Dr. R. Hazlett, the authors of the most recent and encompassing textbook on volcanology (Wiley, 2010, 2nd ed. in review). Therefore there should not be any scientific faults. Thank you, S. Kempe

KempeIAGeng (talk) 19:33, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&oldid=1008921895"