Jump to content

User talk:chicdat

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 3DPrintingTimPostma (talk | contribs) at 11:21, 26 February 2021. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.


• hi i would like to say 3DPrintingTimPostma (talk) 11:21, 26 February 2021 (UTC) is not a sock puppet the only reason why 11:21, 26 February 2021 (UTC) has so many counts is the forgot password got jammed[reply]

Draft:Itamar Medical

Hi there, why did you rejected my new draft after I corrected all asked? this is why resubmitting is for, isnt it? Shanisun (talk) 15:44, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, but after enough resubmissions, it eventually comes to the point where the draft is rejected. By the time this happens, usually all hope is lost of the draft becoming an article. I can think of one rejected draft that became an article: Medical Women's Association of Nigeria.

Anyway, in May, Davidwr rejected it. You resubmitted it. I came over to your draft, and I re-rejected it. Now you have submitted it again. I will review it, but if you continue resubmitting it then you'll eventually see it here. 🐔 Chicdat  Bawk to me! 11:28, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Chicdat, so because it was submitted in the past, than it wont be approved? even though all is corrected and I added many many many more sources so its very "clear" this company qualifies? it doesnt seem fair... at the end the whole point is to give the right chance to a worthy articles, isnt it? what do you want me to do now? did you review it or just reject because of the past? (i'm confused so im trying to better understand). Shanisun (talk) 11:40, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Chicdat also, I think its importent you will know that I am the new head for this article after the person who managed it before, left. Shanisun (talk) 11:42, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Shanisun, you're a very eager editor, but if you really want help, you should ask at our help desk. The editors there might even be able to accept it. 🐔 Chicdat  Bawk to me! 11:47, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Chicdat I have. This is after they help and guided me... Shanisun (talk) 11:48, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, yes. I'll send you some useful links on your talk page. 🐔 Chicdat  Bawk to me! 11:50, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
(edit conflict) It's not just the sources. You also have problems with the tone. WP:NPOV comes into view. 🐔 Chicdat  Bawk to me! 11:44, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
working on it right now. Thank you! Should I resubmit after or ask you first? Shanisun (talk) 12:10, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Right now, please. 🐔 Chicdat  Bawk to me! 12:15, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I can fix it no problem.. can you point out please? My aim is simply to get it 100% best and fit. Shanisun (talk) 11:47, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
See my comment above, about the help desk? 🐔 Chicdat  Bawk to me! 11:47, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Bawk to me! I did see it and replied on it. I even chatted on live help chat and did what all asked me. Cant you please try and help since you are the reviewer? Shanisun (talk) 11:54, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Sure! I can help you all you want. 🐔 Chicdat  Bawk to me! 11:55, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you so much.. im lost and I dont want past mistakes to hurt the chances... if you can please just tell me whats the problem with the tone, it will be great... regarding the sources, I fixed it for sure and added in depth sources. Shanisun (talk) 11:59, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Avoid words described in this page. That's about it. 🐔 Chicdat  Bawk to me! 12:02, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Shanisun: Resubmit it right away, please. I will review it again. 🐔 Chicdat  Bawk to me! 12:08, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I have... I can't breath :( — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shanisun (talkcontribs) 12:23, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. I've accepted it. 🐔 Chicdat  Bawk to me! 12:25, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I want to celebrate!!!!! Thank you!!!!!!!
You are very welcome. 🐔 Chicdat  Bawk to me! 11:01, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Chicdat, can you help me understand which sources led you to accept this draft at AfC please? All of the sources I've spot-checked at random are either press releases or interviews. Which ones have you based notability on? Best, Darren-M talk 10:06, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

None. Shanisun pressured me into accepting it. This is happening again, with Deniz Unay. 🐔 Chicdat  Bawk to me! 12:08, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your reply. I have sent this back to draftspace. Best, Darren-M talk 13:07, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
It won't happen again. 🐔 Chicdat  Bawk to me! 11:22, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deniz Unay

Hi chicdat I spoke with experienced editors on the Wikipedia online support chat page. I took all necessary warnings into consideration and reviewed my source links. Creating a wikipedia page is really difficult and confusing for a living person. But if you study the article Government agencies Science article references National and International news agencies and resources Non-governmental organizations In addition, when Deniz UNAY's works in many fields are searched on google, the results Assign a lot of work and living in Turkey also signed article published nearly one in 15 languages I hope you will re-examine it taking into account all my efforts greetings — Preceding unsigned comment added by Emremer (talkcontribs) 11:11, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I've accepted it. 🐔 Chicdat  Bawk to me! 11:32, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Chicdat, you shouldn't have accepted this draft. It was highly promotional in nature, and the creator is suspected to be an undisclosed paid editor in violation of the Terms of Use of the Wikimedia Foundation. For now I've cleaned up some of the fluff. Please be mindful of such drafts in the future. Thanks. JavaHurricane 14:31, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

hello Chicdat I wrote you about my article today Subsequently the article was accepted and approved But within a few hours I got this warning and I'm shocked I really can't believe i don't mind In a previous review that was rejected, it was called copy content. then corrected back i hope this is a mistake This article may have been created or edited in return for undisclosed payments, a violation of Wikipedia's terms of use. It may require cleanup to comply with Wikipedia's content policies. (February 2021) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Emremer (talkcontribs) 14:43, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I encourage you not to reply to this message per WP:DENY. The draft has been placed by a user with nigh-unmatched knowledge of undisclosed paid editors, by the way. JavaHurricane 15:12, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Is this a true vandal? WP:DENY covers "True vandals and trolls..." This seems to me like another poor, misunderstood newbie. With careful coaching, a new editor can be turned around towards good faith. Some users are "block first, ask questions later." If I were an admin, I would use blocks sparingly and try to coach/mentor new editors - like I'm trying to do right now. 🐔 Chicdat  Bawk to me! 11:45, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Draft is now at AfD. JavaHurricane 04:28, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

pls help me

Hello again I went to the Wikipedia support chat page regarding the latest status of the article, unfortunately, no one helped. In addition, shortly after the article was approved, it received a warning in the form of a paid article and the content of the article began to be deleted. i don't know what to do and i'm very worried can you please help me — Preceding unsigned comment added by Emremer (talkcontribs) 17:35, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Emremer. Something sad has just happened. Your article is about to be deleted. There's nothing you can do. But there is one thing. You can create an article on another topic. Like, for instance, improve J Mascis + The Fog. This article. I created it. It got deleted. I moved on. And – I learned. One last thing. I am not an admin. (So many users think I am. Maybe I should run someday.) 🐔 Chicdat  Bawk to me! 11:57, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hii

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Hi today https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deniz_Unay My article has been approved I want to say the following about the article I have been working on this article for more than 4 months I took into account all rejections and also got information and support from editors in wikipedia support chat You can see developments on this subject on the Talk Page In addition, the other day, this article was rejected in the form of a copy, and this error was corrected, now the article has been unfairly deleted. There is no charge for this article I don't know how to defend myself on this issue I also added the best resources about Deniz UNAY, if you look at google searches, dozens of valuable resources can be found. Please don't be so cruel and unfair I hope you can help greetings — Preceding unsigned comment added by Emremer (talkcontribs) 19:59, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

See my above comment. 🐔 Chicdat  Bawk to me! 11:59, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Draft:Husky (rapper)

Hi Chicdat,

I'm a little confused why the sources provided for Husky don't qualify. I include articles directly about the subject of the article from the NYT, the Guardian, and BBC in the article: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/nov/22/russian-rapper-husky-faces-jail-over-gig-on-car-roof

Looking back at this link - seems like it might be broken, but here's another link at The Guardian connected to it that vouches for that (something I can fix in the draft too): https://www.theguardian.com/world/video/2018/nov/22/moment-russian-rapper-husky-arrested-impromptu-car-roof-gig-video — Preceding unsigned comment added by Бундист (talkcontribs) 19:00, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

https://www.bbc.com/russian/news-46292459

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/11/23/world/europe/russia-rapper-husky-prison.html

As well as articles from well-known, popular, and independent Russian language news sources (Meduza and Kommersant) on the artist's overall trajectory in the country: https://meduza.io/feature/2017/02/03/pochemu-haski-novaya-bolshaya-zvezda-rossiyskogo-hip-hopa

https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/4511586

I would love some clarification about why these don't qualify.

Бундист (talk) 18:42, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A few of these sources aren't actually super reliable. I don't mean that they're terrible, but that they need other sources to support them. 🐔 Chicdat  Bawk to me! 11:29, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Can you elaborate on this? The BBC, the Guardian, and the NYT are all listed as reliable sources on Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Perennial_sources. How are these not reliable - what standard are you using? Бундист (talk) 17:23, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I am with Бундист in here. These are clear RS. MarioJump83! 03:03, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, you are now my adoptee!

I'm starting to realize that I'm your only friend regarding that article - I also think that it will be our work, not just your work. It's both of us now. Since I like watching sports myself (Bucs won!) - I would like to say this word: MarioJump83 and Chicdat against someone who wants to bring that down. Even if we doesn't agree with all the things we do, we are working together now to reach that goal, which is Cyclone Owen GA. MarioJump83! 02:59, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

From my words above, you are now my adoptee. If you want to learn some basics, here it is: Wikipedia:Adopt-a-user/Adoptee's Area/Resources. I really believed in you and sometimes in a trouble, especially with Jason Rees, and you talked to me a lot about asking for help from me, and this is why you got adopted by me in Wikipedia!
Congratulations!
Congratulations on your recent adoption, Chicdat, and welcome to Wikipedia! I saw that you have expressed an interest in being adopted by an experienced editor. Being an experienced editor myself, I accepted your request. Whether you want to learn about wiki markup, find something to do, or just talk to somebody, I'm the person to see about it - just leave a message on my talk page. Remember, I am willing to help you and make your time here more enjoyable. Feel free to ask me any questions you might have, and remember to "be BOLD!"- I'm here to help you; no question is a stupid one. In the mean time, here are some pages that you might find helpful, in case you haven't already gotten the official welcoming:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome and congratulations!

I'm hoping that you can graduate. To graduate, you have to eliminate that administrative ban and get that rollback/page mover back. MarioJump83! 08:57, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Four things to say to you.
  1. Thank you, thank you, thank you, thank you, thank you. This was just what I needed.
  2. On the adoption page, it says you are adopting a globally locked LTA. How? Off-wiki?
    It was in an off-wiki, e-mail discussion. (They demanded my help, and thus I decided to adopt them.) MarioJump83! 11:42, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Owen? Yes, it will get to GA.
  4. [Y]ou have to eliminate that administrative ban and get that rollback/page mover back. Half a year ago, I asked on WP:AN about it. I was told it was not a ban, but a strong advisory to stay out of administrative areas. Cabayi said to me, At the start of the summer I came across three new, young editors, including you, who were strong on enthusiasm and short on skill who kept telling other editors what to do. The other two kept on down that path and got themselves blocked. Your switch to working on content, especially Tropical Storms, in collaboration with Hurricanehink & others has been an encouraging and hopeful exception to that cluster. It's my honest belief that the most supportive thing the community can help you with is to urge you to keep away from those administrative areas for the time being. I replied I'll continue working on content, and won't apply again for lifting [of the ban] until I get three featured articles. Or maybe twenty-seven Face-smile.svg I guess I'll have to do it after 0 FAs.

Again: thank you. 🐔 Chicdat  Bawk to me! 11:48, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Well. Thank you so much! I have a page set for you to get you on speed. MarioJump83! 12:48, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AWB

It looks like you're doing a lot of semi-automated stuff. You may try to request AWB permissions here: Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/AutoWikiBrowser. Note that this is not linked to the adoptee page, just a suggestion. MarioJump83! 01:45, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I will apply. 🐔 Chicdat  Bawk to me! 11:01, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Owen

While Owen maybe an early December tropical cyclone, I do not really regard it as unusual, as it's well within the cyclone season for that region. I also note that we have had Liua, Owen, Rita and Yasa form within the Coral Sea over the last few years before late December which is why I removed it as a trivial fact.Jason Rees (talk) 14:59, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I see your point. Three consecutive seasons kind of breaks the "rare" part. 🐔 Chicdat  Bawk to me! 11:03, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Tali Rubinstein

Hello Chicdat,

Thank you very much for taking the time to review Draft:Tali Rubinstein! I have been working on getting more secondary sources, and feel that it's in a pretty good place now and was hoping to get some feedback. Do you think it's in a good enough place now to resubmit? Or do you think it needs more work? I was comparing it to a similar page ([[1]]) and it looks like the sources are as good if not better than this published article. Thanks again! Haveitall07 (talk) 06:06, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Haveitall07, yes! You can resubmit. MarioJump83! 07:09, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Great, thank you! Haveitall07 (talk) 07:31, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kuhl irrigation (Himachal Pradesh)

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Hi, I've accepted the draft Kuhl irrigation (Himachal Pradesh). You had previously declined it as lacking reliable sources, which is strange, as the sourcing was excellent as far as I could see. If there's anything in particular that you don't find reliable there, you can tag it with {{better source}}. Thanks! – Uanfala (talk) 21:35, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm new to reviewing; currently I'm taking a break from it. 🐔 Chicdat  Bawk to me! 11:18, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.