Talk:Genetic discrimination

This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Template:WikiProject Genetics

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Medicine Mid‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Discrimination Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Discrimination, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Discrimination on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DiscriminationWikipedia:WikiProject DiscriminationTemplate:WikiProject DiscriminationDiscrimination
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Law Mid‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Lyoflo1 (article contribs). This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 22 August 2019 and 4 December 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Katelynneller, B.johnson98 (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Liuxiaohao0927. This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 26 January 2021 and 5 May 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Sh1539 (article contribs).

Laws elsewhere

You mention laws in other countries, which countries and what do their laws say?

Some text in this article was originally taken from http://ghr.nlm.nih.gov/info=genetic_testing/show/alltopics (public domain)

JAMA Vol. 300 No. 3, July 16, 2008 has a commentary entitled European Practices of Genetic Information and Insurance...basically, Europeans have had the laws for a while, but they're sort of useless based on technicalities. II | (t - c) 11:29, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merger proposal

Hi, the page "Genism" also covers the same topic.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genism

A merger might be sensible. Bucoli (talk) 15:58, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I agree in the opposite direction. Merge Genetic Discrimination into Genism. -76.121.251.142 (talk) 23:15, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Genism/genoism is an uncommon neologism for genetic discrimination. -Jason A. Quest (talk) 17:27, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Someone redirected the Genism article here without merging.

Please merge the information from the other artcile in to make this article more complete. Remember this is an encyclopedia and it is important to get as complete an overview as possible. Thanks.-Rainbowofpeace (talk) 22:32, 9 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

There was nothing there that seemed worth merging to me. If you disagree, the entire article history is still there at the redirect and you can merge whatever seems to you to be relevant to here.— alf laylah wa laylah (talk) 22:42, 9 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Genetic discrimination. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110726104538/http://www.gjga.org/inside.asp?a=1&action=item&source=documents&id=19 to http://www.gjga.org/inside.asp?a=1&action=item&source=documents&id=19

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:43, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Adding Sources, Expanding Examples of Genetic Discrimination in Other Countries, and Intersectionality Section

We will be fact-checking sources and adding new sources when necessary to improve this article. Additioanlly, we will provide examples of Genetic Discrimination in Canada and the United Kingdom.

Finally, it is important to mention the intersectionality of genetic discrimination, therefore we will be adding this section to the page. Lyoflo1 (talk) 21:37, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that it's important to mention intersectionality, but the current section is extremely confusing. I'm not an expert on intersectionality or genoism, so I can't offer to rewrite it. ThePedanticPrick (talk) 01:44, 12 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Added brief clarification about GINA with a citation. Katelynneller (talk) 15:18, 17 October 2019 (UTC)User:Katelynneller[reply]

I removed the references to the blogpost by Ewan Birney. This is not a reliable source by Wikipedia standards (WP:RS). AndewNguyen (talk) 06:06, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]