User talk:Kautilya3

Archives

Index 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20

RESTORE THE ORIGINAL VERSION

hey dear buddy i want to draw your attention on the wikipedia page on rajput from last two days there is a edit war on the page there are two three profiles which are just 1 -2 months old are adding some propganda reference and investing heavy time on editing the whole article completely and prsenting it in derogatory way to . the intent of these editors are clear to change page content to malign the image. the page is now protected by them after editing ,a heavy editing and page makeover is done in past two days ,kindly look into the matter and restore the page to last stable version .--Loneltrussia (talk) 05:52, 18 August 2020 (UTC

Articles on Gram Panchayats of India

Please see Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Kamand_Gram_Panchayat and give your opinion. --Tagooty (talk) 13:46, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for informing me Tagooty. I suggest you retitle the page as I suggested. And thanks for the great pictures! -- Kautilya3 (talk) 06:32, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Any idea how long it takes to walk from one campus to the other? -- Kautilya3 (talk) 06:39, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Will follow-up on re-titling after giving a day for any other responses.
Walking between campuses takes 45 mins along the PWD road (right bank of the stream), about 30 mins partly along the road and fording a stream, and 30 mins to walk along a rough path through the forest (left bank of the stream). --Tagooty (talk) 09:39, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Jai Shri Ram

Hi there! Thank you for your comment on my talk page. I've since undid the edit you made on Jai Shri Ram because the information I initially added was provided from the already-cited source. I take full responsibility for any confusion as I didn't provide any summary regarding my changes or where I got the information from. The information was present in the already-cited article from the Times of India, but the information in the Wikipedia article inaccurately presented the information from the article, hence I reworded it to make it more consistent. Hope that clears it up; all my best!! -- — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheCherryPanda (talk • contribs)

TheCherryPanda, thanks for explaining. Please make it a practice to explain your edits in the edit summaries. In this case, an appropriate summary could have been "expanded from the cited source".

The system says fewer than 5% of your edits have edit summaries. Good editors achieve 90% or more edit summary usage. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 06:25, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Amit Shah & National Democratic Alliance wikipedia pages contradicting information in table

Hi Kautilya3, Is amit shah the current chair person of Natonal Democratic Alliance (NDA)??? When you go at National Democratic Alliance wikipedia page its chairperson in its table is written as JP Nadda but in Amit Shah wikipedia page in it's table it is written he is incumbent chairperson of NDA, Either the word incumbent should be removed and as his term ended on 20 january 2020 in Amit shah wikipedia page or JP nadda should be replaced by amit shah as Chairperson in National Democratic Alliance wikipedia page's table whichever is correct, pls have a look and correct it as the information is contradicting itself in Amit Shah and National Democratic Alliance wikipedia pages respectively.. Swtadi143 (talk) 08:53, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I have no idea. I am interested in politics, but not necessarily politicians. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 09:47, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Point 5353

Hi, please have a look at: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Point_5353#Third_opinion. Your help is requested. Regards, Springnuts (talk) 17:58, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I rolled back your last edits to this article. May I encourage you to now focus your editing work elsewhere please? First, because you will not achieve what you wish to achieve; second because you will likely end up sanctioned for disruptive editing. If that feels too difficult, it may perhpas be time for a Wiki-break? With warmest good wishes, and all respect. Springnuts (talk) 16:13, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Springnuts, well, that is a surprise. Are you going to be an involved editor now? -- Kautilya3 (talk) 16:40, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No, I am not; not least as I am not especially interested in this article (I have not even "watched" it). And that's the point: you clearly have very strong convictions about the article: given that three separate editors have reverted the changes you made to this article it would be best for you to leave it alone. Please do not misunderstand the spirit of friendship in which I left the note above for you: I believe moving on will protect your mental health and stress levels. There are currently 6,246,235 other articles in the English Wikipedia; many of which will benefit from your time and attention. With good wishes and all respect. Springnuts (talk) 15:03, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you are counting yourself among "three editors" then you are an involved editor, and you are subject to the same policies as every one else. And you need to justify your revert, rather than hiding behind "words to the wise". I have raised query on the article talk page, and I look forward to your response there. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 15:09, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You will wait in vain. Happy editing. Springnuts (talk) 18:55, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Bijbehara shooting incident article

Hi Kautilya3,

Could you have a look upon the article 'Bijbehara shooting incident' ? The user ArihantB had made unexplained changes and moved the title's article on October 2020 by citing policies such as 'neutral point of view'. I was able to revert back to the old revision but I wasn't able to revert back the page's title move. Could you have a look ?

Thank you. Wishing you a beautiful evening.

Imranqazi90 (talk) 21:18, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Imranqazi90, I have requested the page to be moved back at WP:RM. All the best. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 23:05, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Have a great day. Imranqazi90 (talk) 00:54, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

2020 China–India skirmishes talk page

Greetings,

Please be aware that the anon editor you're interacting with on Talk:2020 China–India skirmishes (208.104.194.194 and 208.104.49.104 so far) is very likely a sockpuppet of Shulinjiang; the editor has a history of WP:TENDENTIOUS, and as of late has really taken to WP:BLUDGEON on talk pages. (As it turns out, they've shown up on the 2020 China–India skirmishes talk before under other IPs, like 172.72.222.15.) You can see the same sort of talk page behaviour at Talk:Shenyang WS-10 from Sept 2020.

Chances are if you don't add everything that the anon editor wants, they will - if you're lucky - just keep hammering away at the talk page with ever longer, repetitive, and poorly formatted ref bombs. - RovingPersonalityConstruct (talk, contribs) 03:03, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 19

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Point 5353, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Drass.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:32, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Barnstar of Diligence
	Small show of admiration for the way you conduct yourself from discussions to carefully-planned, solid edits :) ➤ Zᴇᴇx.ʀɪᴄᴇ ✪ (ᴛᴀʟᴋ) 01:34, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks very much Zeex.rice. That is quite encouraging, as I think I have actually been getting heated a little in the recent days. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 11:43, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Zeyan Shafiq

Hello Kautilya 3, could you please share your opinion here here. –Kammil ⟨talk⟩ 16:41, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pak-Aryan Migration

The “Indo-Aryan” is Fallacy of Modern History:

The terminology of Indo-Aryan Migration must also be changed as “Pak-Aryan Migration” because Aryan entered into modern Pakistan either from modern Afghanistan or from modern Iran and then moved away from River Indus towards River Ganga and Jumna after settling down for hundreds of years in regions which are part of modern Pakistan.

Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 08:30, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sure. Panini called them ayudha-jivi sanghas, in modern parlance, "militant societies". It looks to me like the Aryans ran away from Pakistan as fast as they could. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 10:45, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

My my, what an attitude! Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 12:12, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Well (he blushes). Modern maps are quite misleading because they create spaces and give the illusion of societies. But until very recent times, "Pakistan" was a blank space between Sindh and Gandhara. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 12:18, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Priya Ramani

Hello, I have reduced the quotes on Priya Ramani's page, to a degree that I think is sufficient to remove the tag you added, but I wanted to let you know and find out if you had any objections. Thank you, Beccaynr (talk) 21:57, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Beccaynr, thanks for letting me know. I will take a look. Please don't remove the template yourself unless there is a clear consensus on the talk page that it is not needed any more. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 22:04, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Srinagar

Hi Kautilya,

I hope you are doing well. I just wanted to ask you if you could say if Government organisations are not reliable sources. In fact, I had posted the Kashmiri pronunciation of Srinagar which is Sirinagar with reference to our Kashmiri Language Dictionary published by the Jammu and Kashmir Academy of Arts Culture and Languages. My editings were reverted by stating that "Government organisations are not reliable sources". A dictionary written by Government Academy isn't a reliable source ? Imranqazi90 (talk) 14:03, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I think the other editor is wrong. An "Academy of Arts" would be generally an autonomous organisation, just like Universities are. They don't necessarily represent the government viewpoint.

That. having been said, "Sri" and "Siri" are essentially the same word, one being Sanskrit and the other Prakrit. So it is not worth putting it in the lead. But the Kashmiri pronunciation should be certainly included. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 14:51, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a ton Kautilya3.I will add the Kashmiri pronunciation next to the English one. Imranqazi90 (talk) 05:52, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Extra-Harappan

My English is failing me; what does the following, from Witzel (2019), Early ' Aryans' and their neighbors outside and inside India p.5 , qouted at Sinauli, mean:

The archaeology of this period is little known,39 but it may still deliver surprises: the recently discovered items at Sinauli (just east of Delhi) include carts (not ‘chariots’),40 and copper inlaid coffins and swords, that clearly belong to the late Bronze Age (thus before 1000 BCE). This find may point to the survival of an extra-Harappan organized society. However, we need better dating (going beyond the Late Bronze Age label). [Note 40: Habitually, nearly all old carts are incorrectly called ‘chariots’ in the press and even in Indian scholarly papers.]

Non-Harappan? Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 06:50, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

He means something like the "Indus periphery" of the geneticists. Witzel doesn't actually write English. He writes German and transliterates it into English :-) -- Kautilya3 (talk) 09:23, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Jammu Massacre of 1947

Hi you seem to be active in the area. I was thinking of creating a stand alone article for the Jammu massacre of 1947 since there is none and the one which exists seems a diversion and deflection to downplay the killings of Muslims in Jammu by adding Mirpur and Rajouri information what do you think? Or we could add mention of the Jammu Massacre to those articles to explain prioe events regards. Himachal78 (talk) 08:58, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nothing has been underplayed or overplayed. it is still the same as what it was when created in 2017. Jammu has been propagandised a lot. It is hard to unravel the truth. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 10:20, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I agree so I propose a separate article free of Mirpur and Rajouri propaganda influence those articles themselves are heavily propagandist Himachal78 (talk) 10:58, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Anyways I shall go ahead a right up the Jammu Massacre of 1947 article you can add and assist as you please it deserves a separate page considering it was the much larger massacre. Himachal78 (talk) 11:08, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Creation of WP:POVFORKs is not allowed. It will get deleted. Your best bet is to raise your issues on the talk pages of the existing articles. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 11:33, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It's not a fork considering the article is about several Massacres and not just Jammu Massacres it's 3 separate incidents throughout the region being discussed there and this will be solely on the events in Jammu under Hari Singhs reign just like Mirpur Massacre is about etc Himachal78 (talk) 11:42, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If that's the case Mirpur and Rajouri are forks of Jammu Massacre and they all should be consolidated into Jammu. Himachal78 (talk) 11:43, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

YOu can propose merging the other two articles into 1947 Jammu massacres. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 11:54, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi it seems a merger proposal was already done in the past but you seemed to be the only one against it could you kindly explain why such excessive attention should be paid to Mirpur and Rajouri in a article related to Jammu Massacre? It seems like I said before a clear diversion/deflection strategy to downplay what happened in Jammu by pushing in mention of Mirpur and now Rajouri into every mention. Maybe we should add Jammu massacre to Mirpur and Rajouri articles instead ? That could balance it out. Himachal78 (talk) 19:18, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I don't have any in-principle objection to them being merged into the Jammu massacres page, but I would require that they be brought up to the same standard as the Jammu massacres page before they can be merged. This article is rated B-class. The other two are rated C-class (questionably) and start-class. If you have the energy and interest, bring them up to B-class and then we can merge them.

But I don't see how it will help you anyway. Since you are claiming that focus on Jammu is being "lost" because the other massacres are being mentioned there. Adding more content about them will reduce the focus even further. So I don't see any logic to it. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 20:48, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

So I think we can agree a separate article for Jammu Massacre alone is needed for balance. I may work on it but as of now I think it will be too much work for me on second thought and may as you said be deleted on erroneous grounds so I will just leave it as for now thank you Kautilya for conversing with me and for your input. Till we meet again Regards. Himachal78 (talk) 21:15, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Samboora, Jammu and Kashmir

Hello Kautilya, a discussion is going on here about the content of the same article. You may share your thoughts there. Thanks! –Kammill ⟨talk⟩ 11:22, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Annexation

The source/reference stated "Some (civilians) were lined up and shot by Indian Army soldiers" it goes onto say the Indian state has tried to cover up these crimes PremijAnans (talk) 22:48, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]