Talk:Yahoo Mail
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Yahoo Mail article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 12 months |
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
This page is not a forum for general discussion about Yahoo Mail. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Yahoo Mail at the Reference desk. |
This page has archives. Sections older than 365 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 2 sections are present. |
Privacy of emails
I would like to add this into the list of 'controversies', although there is probably so much user apathy that I'm not sure it fits as a controversy. Anyway, like Gmail, Yahoo! Mail is allowed to read through all users' emails, for the purpose of showing targetted advertising to each of those users.
Here is verbatim text from the current (new) user agreement:
"By selecting 'OK', our technology will also analyse your communications to provide additional email features, like deals when you travel, and tailored content and ads across our network."
(SOURCE: https://guce.oath.com/collectConsent?sessionId=4_cc-session_XXXXXXXX-XXXX-XXXX-XXXX-XXXXXXXXXXXX&lang=&inline=false&jsVersion=null&experiment=null [edited for privacy])
—DIV (120.18.81.33 (talk) 10:02, 10 June 2018 (UTC))
- Something being true does not make it a controversy. We would need a reliable source that discusses this and says it is controversial. ~ GB fan 11:42, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
2020 source
"As of January 2020, Yahoo! Mail had 225 million users.[7]"
The source for this comment is an article written in 2017 7, so I assume the sentence above is wrong? SpamHunters (talk) 06:02, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
- Done - I already changed it once but was reverted without my knowledge, Changed back, Cheers, –Davey2010Talk 15:51, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
- C-Class Websites articles
- Low-importance Websites articles
- C-Class Websites articles of Low-importance
- C-Class Computing articles
- Unknown-importance Computing articles
- All Computing articles
- All Websites articles
- C-Class Internet articles
- Low-importance Internet articles
- WikiProject Internet articles
- WikiProject Apps
- C-Class apps articles
- Low-importance apps articles
- WikiProject Apps articles
- C-Class Internet culture articles
- Low-importance Internet culture articles
- WikiProject Internet culture articles