Talk:Line of Contact
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
Removed unsourced, POV material
I cut three sentences that were extremely POV, and apparently original research, too. I see this page had been tagged in the past, but no discussion happened here. I couldn't see any way to salvage this chunk. "What this meant" goes far beyond an unsourced description of some Germans' alleged reactions to different varieties of Soviet troops. If we want to cover such issues, I think we'll need sources, and encyclopedic writing. Thanks. Ale And Quail (talk) 00:55, 18 March 2012 (UTC)
Possible NPOV issue
I have tagged the sentence "Austria managed to stay free of Soviet domination, whereas Czechoslovakia did not." as possibly non-neutral. I am not sure how to resolve the problem, but I don't think that "managed to stay free of Soviet domination" is neutral wording. Please can someone correct this if possible? Thanks, DesertPipeline (talk) 22:57, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
- I agree. Czechoslovakia had a popular vote to determine its communist future. Soviet domination is not only non-neutral its also wrong. F.Alexsandr (talk) 14:50, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Really? Czechoslovakia chose to be communist? I guess they changed their minds by 1968, eh? Instead of pro-Soviet revisionism, we should note that multiple future Warsaw pact countries did not want to be under the Soviet yoke, and Soviet authorities in no way allowed free choice - if they had, there would have been no Warsaw pact. Lets get real on this please