Jump to content

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Çelebicihan

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Щіпальця (talk | contribs) at 13:31, 23 March 2021. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Çelebicihan

Çelebicihan (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log· investigate · cuwiki)

Populated account categories: confirmed · suspected

For archived investigations, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Çelebicihan/Archive.

This SPI case may involve cross-wiki abuse. Please consider reporting the results on Meta; checkusers can send an email to the interwiki checkuser mailing list if required.



20 March 2021

– A checkuser has completed a check on relevant users in this case, and it is now awaiting administration and close.

Suspected sockpuppets


Recreation of Svitlana Bevza at Bevza Svitlana. We haven't seen this sockpuppeteer in a while, and this account suggests the tactics, techniques and procedures have changed. MER-C 15:27, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

  • Dear @Blablubbs, what do you mean by putting me here in that list? I read the section Defending yourself against claims and feel good as I didn't violate any of the wikipedia rules. But I'm pretty much confused of your statement "The following accounts are on the same connection". Can you please explain what is "the same connection"? To make things clear I state that I don't know any of the mentioned accounts. However, I do see that some of them have edited English wikipedia articles about politicians related to Ukraine. Is that the case or something else? I ask you and anyone else to remove any suspicions from me. And if possible to explain what do I violate. If it can help, I live in Ukraine and edit from here. @TonyBallioni - thank you for suggesting a deep look. It all looks strange.

P.S. in order to facilitate the process of discussion I ping here the accounts and ask them to explain what they could do wrong. @Breaking Sir, @Braduman, @Tarabono00, @Inkitrinky, @Inger Berg18, @Pestrolim, @Pysatel, @Olga Malozhvanets, @Nameitgood --Щіпальця (talk) 09:22, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

Please examine cross-wiki behaviour before blocking. I'm not confident enough to block any of these accounts with doing a deep dive through other projects, and I don't have the time for that right now, so reporting and letting clerks and patrolling admins look at it. TonyBallioni (talk) 19:38, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
thank you for explaining @Blablubbs. So, that is a question for me too, why @TonyBallioni put me on a list. If same connection means same IP - why TonyBallioni didn't state that clearly? Talking about IP, I'm sure enough it is a mistake as I use it from my mobile phone (and it provides a dynamic IP). My brothers and sisters don't edit or create wikipedia profiles. Maybe my IP range is in a blacklist or something? Can I ask someone else to investigate the results of the CU too? --Щіпальця (talk) 13:31, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]