Jump to content

Talk:ITU Region

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Prairie Astronomer (talk | contribs) at 20:04, 24 March 2021 (Assessment (Low): Amateur radio, Radio (Rater)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconAmateur radio Stub‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Amateur radio, which collaborates on articles related to amateur radio technology, organizations, and activities. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
To-do list:

Improve to GA-Class:

Expand and improve:

Create:

WikiProject iconRadio Stub‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Radio, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Radio-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
To-do List:

Region boundaries

What part of East Asia is in region 2? According to this map it looks like it is all in region 3, including Philippines and Japan. --Blainster 20:36, 15 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

None of East Asia is in Region 2. Except for Russia and Mongolia, which are Region 1, all of the eastern Asian continent is in Region 3. The Philippines and Japan are also in Region 3. This article had many errors in it before I commented. I removed all the mistakes I could find. --65.188.161.98 05:12, 17 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Why have regions at all ?

Why not have the same frequency allocations in all three regions ? Surely these differences cause difficulties with

  • 1) Importation of equipment between different regions
  • 2) Interference problems on shortwave/high frequency radio signals which span regional boundries
  • 3) Localised interference problems on ALL frequency ranges along the boundary between regions 1 and 3
  • 4) Difficulties with communications equipment on board ships and aircraft travelling between regions

The whole point of the ITU surely is to harmonise radio spectrum usage standards around the world. Breaking the world into three arbitary "regions" surely flies in the face of this ? 80.229.222.48 10:33, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It had something to do with military use. Europe and America were made separate. In the event of World War III, civilian stuff would get eliminated. The distinct frequency allocations would allow allies to avoid interfering with each other -- considered more important than being able to easily communicate. AlbertCahalan 22:06, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Much more likely it's because habits and traditions in the early age of radio (1920s, 1930s), developed separately on different continents. Jaho (talk) 04:27, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Map has errors?

I think the map has some places incorrectly marked. French Polynesia is Region 3. Falkland Islands and the South Georgia Islands are Region 2. Yes? --ChrisRuvolo (t) 19:14, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]