User talk:69.220.184.129

The Cowards that refuse to debate

I have removed vandalism by an editor named User talk:Propol |some Propol's contributions He consistently refuses to debate the article on Peter Roskam and when someone confronts and challenges the neutrality of that Article, He's as quick as lighting to acusse any one of being a "sockpuppet".

Now since he's the editor, and not a "GODKING" he should limit himself to discussing content and not being a little wikipolice man, looking for "joe hazelton" in ever edit on Peter Roskam article, which do not conform to is private agenda.

Now I am willing to debate, fairly if this "GOD KING" stops his personal and uncivil attacks with the accusation of "SOCKPUPPET" because he may feel his augment is weak and he feel he must resort to wikilawyering and other tactics of circumvention from the real debate on Peter Roskam, which, Is the article is not consistent with Wikipolicy of WP:NPOV, WP:BLP, as well as my contention that the editors and admins are in violation, due to the histories of their past edits, with WP:COI Conflict of interest policy with regard to biography of living persons.

STOP THE ACCUSATIONS AND STOP HIDING within your proven ability to bully, and come out in the open, in a fair and honest debate, and not exercise of your ability to use wikirulz to bully and persecute all opposition off the article.

PROPOL be A MAN (as you hide behind that mask like a wikilaywering Coward) and enter a fair DEBATE. Prove to me that I’m not correct in my statement.

Muzzling me will BE PROOF that you and Wikipeida are cowardly and afraid of the light and must hide in the darkness of lies and distortions of truth.

BE and MAN and NOT A COWARD and DEBATE!!!

Well, I have been blocked resulting from my disputing with the removal of a link to a democrat "bash and trash" site for the republican candidate Peter Roskam running in the 6th congressional district Illinois.

It is apparent that Goethean violated this 3rr as well. Is he block as well??? - well it take two my mother used say.

What Goethean calls "vandalism" I call removing a link with out merit, which is a blatant bash site and nothing more. Pure editorializing.

Also, I am calling in to question the NPOV of this article

It is very apparent that Goethen has an ax to grind with Republicans and Peter Roskam and using this as his place to "editorialize" with spurious links and bias information is what I am call in to question.

so much for NPOV...

Are we going to have true discussion or will this article be just another bash the evil republican web site run by the "libral Leet".

Joehazelton

I'm sorry, you don't appear to be blockes. Please copy and paste the entire block message here. --Pilotguy ^{(roger that)} 20:33, 19 July 2006 (UTC)

Please do not post copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. See Wikipedia:Copyrights. Copyright violations are unacceptable and persistent violators will be blocked. Your original contributions are welcome. Gamaliel 19:50, 22 August 2006 (UTC)

Please

Hi. I am not sure exactly who you are having problems with, but please don't make edits like this, since it is likely someone will come along and block you for incivility. Feel free to discuss things. Best wishes, Yuser31415 21:24, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

YOUR BEING UNCIVL FOR VANDELIZING MY PAGE ..LET GET IT RIGHT WHOS BEING UNCIVIL HERE MY FREIND.

YOU THE INTERLOPER ON MY PAGE.69.220.184.129 21:35, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

I have blocked you for gross incivlity and disruption. Martinp23 23:06, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

Which is the "disruptor"??? WHO do you answer too????

Muzzling me will BE PROOF that you and Wikipeida are cowardly and afraid of the light and must hide in the darkness of lies and distortions of truth.69.220.184.129 23:41, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

---