User talk:IAmPushpak

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Drat8sub#atkmb See and make both articles same please — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.131.75.21 (talk) 11:31, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May 2018

Hello, I'm HickoryOughtShirt?4. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Organizer have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 18:22, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to List of Bollywood films of 2018, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Can you explain the 'Rating' column and its use? It might help to add it back. Vivek Ray (talk) 05:41, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, IAmPushpak, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Vivek Ray (talk) 07:01, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

fixing needed

atkmb - Assistant coach* And short name AMB (see mohun bagan subpage) last, mb subpage should have moved jerseys as on atkmb says not released (Merge request also outdated) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.143.87.72 (talk) 19:02, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

September 2020

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Mohun Bagan A.C.. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges. Thank you. Drat8sub (talk) 20:13, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

November 2020

Hello, I'm Opalzukor. I noticed that you recently removed content from Mohun Bagan without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Opalzukor (talk) 08:46, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Opalzukor, I believe I have mentioned the reason of my edits in the talk page as well as the discussion. It is clearly a vandalism in the name of the original page Mohun Bagan AC. Hope you will help in deleting this page. IAmPushpak (talk) 08:51, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article is already listed on AfD, it'll get deleted anyway. In the mean time, the article shouldn't be blanked so as to provide evidence for the Afd discussion. Thank you for your time. Opalzukor (talk) 08:59, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Opalzukor, Ok thanks for the clarification. IAmPushpak (talk) 10:17, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

December 2020

Hi IAmPushpak! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Mohun Bagan A.C. that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. NZFC^(talk)^(cont) 21:02, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Mohun Bagan A.C. shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. NZFC^(talk)^(cont) 21:02, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi NZFC, thank you for pointing it out here. As I mentioned in my previous edit, ATK Mohun Bagan FC is not considered as a merged club or a new entity. The former club ATK FC gave up their footballing licenses and Mohun Bagan is playing the ISL as ATK Mohun Bagan FC. There has been a lot of discussions regarding this issue and I believe that to avoid any further controversies or confusions, it would be best to change the link to 'See Also' or remove the redirect. IAmPushpak (talk) 20:35, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kia ora IAmPushpak, I think you will find that since then the consensus has changed as a lot of the first votes on it were WP:SPA accounts, which is why there are three articles now and the ATK Mohun Bagan FC page is fully protected to stop users removing it. It was decided that there is a Mohun Bagan article, a ATK article and then the ATK Mohun Bagan FC one to represent the new merged club. NZFC^(talk)^(cont) 20:49, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi NZFC, Well the ATK Mohun Bagan article was created and now is being managed by the fans of the rival club of Mohun Bagan. They have even made it fully protected . Though anyone can edit whatever they want, but logically, it is not considered as a merged club. From the club president to the owner of the now defunct ATK FC, nobody calls it a merger anymore. Sanjiv Goenka did mentioned it but since ATK FC cancelled their license, there has been no mention of a merger from him either. So I believe a 'See Also' will better serve the purpose rather then calling it a merged club directly. IAmPushpak (talk) 21:03, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

IAmPushpak it doesn't matter who edits it and it was protected to stop people removing it again. I think you need to gain conseus from WP:FOOTY if you want it as See Also because Football Wiki normally treat these situations as a new page. NZFC^(talk)^(cont) 21:17, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

New Page

Hi I am Debankan, I wanted to discuss about creating a page on Mariners' Basecamp - the Ultras of Mohun Bagan A.C.. Since there are pages on Manjappada, East Bengal the Real Power and East Bengal Ultras, so there should be a page for Mohun Bagan Ultras. Debankan (talk) 19:40, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Debankan, firstly thanks a lot for your efforts in Mohun Bagan page. But, brother I am afraid BaseCamp is not the 'official' fan base of Mohun Bagan. There are lots and lots of fan bases of Mohun Bagan. Each and every one might end up having a page then. I would love to discuss more with you. Please contact me on 7003059856 IAmPushpak (talk) 19:51, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Is this your WhatsApp number? If I am not wrong then East Bengal Ultras is too an unofficial fanbase. East Bengal the Real Power is the only official fanbase. I tried to create one but due to some complications, its still on hold Draft:Mariners' Base Camp Debankan Mullick (talk) 06:45, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ATK Mohun Bagan FC

Hi, I've declined all of your multiple deletion requests on this article for the following reasons:

{{prod}} tag: This article has already been discussed at WP:AFD, and thus is not eligible for the proposed deletion process.
{{db-g3}} tags: This is not clear vandalism (eg "Fred was here!!!"), so the CSD G3 criteria does not apply
{{db-attackorg}} tag: This is not obviously an attack or threat towards an individual or an organisation, thus the CSD G10 criteria does not apply
{{db-g14}} tags: This is an article, not a disambiguation page, thus the CSD G14 criteria does not apply.

If you feel like this article should be deleted, you are welcome to nominate it for deletion using the articles for deletion process, but you will need to make a reasoned argument why the subject should not have an article, and you should read and understand these policies before doing so. stwalkerster (talk) 20:54, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

April 2021

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Mohun Bagan A.C., you may be blocked from editing. You have been already warned before. Kindly comply with the policies and the discussions happened. Saha ❯❯❯ Stay safe 06:35, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]