User talk:FirstPrezzzz1776

Hello! I saw you reverted my edit on University of California, Hastings College of the Law, which concerned placement of the image taken from the roof. Please see The manual of style on the placement of images. Generally speaking, images should be on the right. One should avoid sandwiching the text between two images, or between an image and an infobox, as is the current situation on that article. Please also revisit your helpdesk post to see my response there to your earlier concerns. At this point, you need to read the policy pages which you have been referred to both here and on Commons. ~ ONUnicorn^{(Talk|Contribs)}problem solving 05:44, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

What are you talking about?! At Least 3 other images are the same and in the text. It doesn't make sense placed below as you had it. Why do you keep blocking and ruining this? Do you have some type of power trip?

I have not blocked or ruined anything you have done. I also have not changed it back after you reverted me. We are currently on the "discuss" phase of the bold, revert, discuss cycle which is the hallmark of Wikipedia editing. There is one image in the article that is on the left, the one of Serranus Clinton Hastings, not "at least 3" as you say. However, the text isn't sandwiched by that one the way it is by the other one. Have you reviewed the link I provided to the manual of style? Also, when you leave a comment on a talk page, please sign your comment using four tildes (These things: ~). The software will then generate a standardized signature and timestamp. ~ ONUnicorn^{(Talk|Contribs)}problem solving 06:05, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There are 3 in the text, there were two on the left, neither I had added (only edited) before the Commons stupidly deleted them. The images I had are literally uploaded by me on Google Images. They belong to the school and were given to me. This page was completely outdated, had inaccuracies and plain wrong before I spent 8-10 hours today editting. I don't appreciate people blocking me when I know first hand this information and have sourced it correctly. FirstPrezzzz1776 (talk) 06:33, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry this is frustrating for you. I am trying to help you by pointing out policies and guidelines Wikipedia has, which it is important that you follow if you don't appreciate people blocking you. I assume you created FcktheWikiGods to get around the block on Commons. Please read our policy on sockpuppetry, which is essentially the same for Commons as for here. That other account has been blocked (not by me) for violations of the username policy. Please try to understand and follow policies. ~ ONUnicorn^{(Talk|Contribs)}problem solving 16:22, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ONUnicorn can you help with the 41st citation on UC Hastings page I am getting an error and don't know why. Thank you. FirstPrezzzz1776 (talk) 21:46, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I fixed it with this edit. The problem was that you didn't put the title of the pdf in the reference. The {{cite web}} template has several parameters, and some are required while others are not. Title is required for all citation templates. Generally speaking, the more information you provide in references, the better. ~ ONUnicorn^{(Talk|Contribs)}problem solving 22:52, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

UC Hastings page I am a parent of a Hastings alum and updated incorrect and outdated information. Why have to taken it upon yourself to delete accurate information? None of the information I posted was inaccurate or promotionary. I am not affiliated/work for the University. Please put back the factual edits I took time to update. FirstPrezzzz1776 (talk) 06:21, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

FirstPrezzzz1776, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi FirstPrezzzz1776! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Lectonar (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:06, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

Connection with University of California, Hastings College of the Law?

What is the nature of your connection with the University of California, Hastings College of the Law? ElKevbo (talk) 13:50, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

UC Hastings revisions reason unprovided.

Hi, I noticed that you previously undid my new revisions of the schools logos without reasons or explainations. If you you're unfamiliar with school articles pages guidelines, please read WP:UNIGUIDE.

Also looking at your contributions almost all of it is just about UC Hastings. I'm under speculation that you are affiliated with the institution -- WP:COI. TjBison (talk) 02:30, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]