Talk:Austenasia

Micronations C‑class Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Micronations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Micronations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MicronationsWikipedia:WikiProject MicronationsTemplate:WikiProject MicronationsMicronations
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:

Speedy keep, 5 July 2018, see discussion.
Speedy keep, 9 October 2017, see discussion.
Keep, 4 January 2016, see discussion.
Keep, 15 February 2012, see discussion.
No consensus, 20 November 2011 (UTC), see discussion.
Delete, 25 February 2009, see discussion.

Improvement template

So.. what are these "multiple issues"? Qwertyuiop1994 (talk) 14:45, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Merge

The individual, Jonathan Austen has absolutely no notability outside of his role in this micronation. His article is very questionable regarding WP:BIO and WP:GNG. Therefore, the articles should probably be merged. (t · c) buidhe 03:15, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Remain:I'd have to disagree, outside of Austenasia, he is a relatively well known micronationalist and public figure in the community. I think it should stay and I see this page in the same vain as Travis McHenry's article, but I can understand why some would want it merged.--BestOnLifeform (talk) 19:49, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Merge: While I know Jonothan and do believe he is a partially notable micronationalist, he has no relevance being on Wikipedia, unlike Austenasia. Besides, there are so many issues with this article that it seems people have no interest in resolving. Therefore, I support the merge. Jamez517 (talk) 17:12, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I am curious then, on your opinion of him having the article merged whilst say Travis McHenry maintains his article? Just curious.--BestOnLifeform (talk) 19:39, 17 November 2020 (UTC) p.s. I do see and understand your decision making.[reply]

Merge. This seems like a nonnotable individual outside this micronation website community. The whole situation with Austenasia is like an internet joke. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:22, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Merge The subject is not relevant outside of Austenasia, and most sources are of the micronation and not the person himself. Especially so when there are no pages of more notable micronationalists such as Kevin Baugh. ABCGoreng (talk) 08:17, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Reply: ABCGoreng, not necessarily true, see Travis McHenry. --BestOnLifeform (talk) 21:03, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Reply: Micronationalism isn’t necessarily an “internet joke”. BalladeCracker (talk) 08:57, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Merge WP:GNG Articles should be merged. No amount of improvements to his article will suddenly make Jonathan Austen notable.--The Eloquent Peasant (talk) 01:27, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Merge Per WP:GNG, Austen has not achieved widespread notability outside of Austenasia. Anonymous 7481 (talk) 19:09, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Merge Per WP:GNG, while Austenasia may be notable, the 'Emperor' clearly isn't. Therefore, this article should be merged into the Austenasia article. Acc013 (talk) 04:45, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]