Jump to content

Template:Did you know nominations/Violet (opera)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by ಮಲ್ನಾಡಾಚ್ ಕೊಂಕ್ಣೊ (talk | contribs) at 11:04, 14 April 2021 (Fixed obsolete html tag Lint errors). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Montanabw(talk) 05:36, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

Violet (opera)

[edit]

Created by Smerus (talk). Self nominated at 16:57, 25 January 2015 (UTC).

Interesting plot! Good sources, some accepted AGF. "Menage" is not an everyday word, and not in the article. (That may be just me.) "Musical take" is a bit harmless, and doesn't prepare for anything vocal. Ideas? How about "a leading woman" (or a better term) instead of giving her name away? (Every other link in the hook takes away from the article clicks, - wisdom from Andy Mabbett) Perhaps: "... a baritone sings the part of a leading lady" (a woman composer ...), --Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:19, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
@Gerda Arendt:OK I would be happy with - would you prefer? -

Alt 1: ... that in Roger Scruton's musical vision of the eccentric love-life of Violet Gordon-Woodhouse, a leading lady is sung by a baritone?

--Smerus (talk) 11:04, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

Happy. Be prepared to defend "vision", because that is also not a term used in the article. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:14, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
*"Vision"="a creation of fancy". (Wiktionary).--Smerus (talk) 12:50, 28 January 2015 (UTC)