Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pani

Pani

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Pani (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article has been unsourced since 2006. Notability of topic is in question. Coin945 (talk) 05:27, 13 April 2021 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Coin945 (talk) 05:27, 13 April 2021 (UTC)

• Speedy keep, the nominator does not propose a valid WP:DEL-REASON. The nominator does not say which notability guideline this article fails to meet. SailingInABathTub (talk) 10:31, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
• Delete a bunch of unsourced rubbish. We do not keep articles without sources.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:04, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
  • Wikipedia:Deletion policy is that we do not keep articles for which sources cannot be found. Please familiarize yourself with policy. You're getting several of them wrong. Uncle G (talk) 19:21, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
    • No, you are wrong. This article violates verrifiaility. Verrifiability policy says that sources must exist for all articles. We have had this discussion before. Articles need to have sources to be verrified. There are other contradicting things that say other things, but verrifiability says that articles must be sourced to exist.John Pack Lambert (talk) 13:13, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
• Comment, sources added. SailingInABathTub (talk) 14:07, 14 April 2021 (UTC)