Jump to content

User talk:Wmpearl

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Wmpearl (talk | contribs) at 18:04, 25 April 2021 (Speedy deletion nomination of Lego Art). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Archives

Archiving

Hello, Wmpearl. As it is the first of the month and your talk page was extremely long, I have archived it for you. All of your past messages are on a subpage of this one that you can access by clicking the link above. I hope you don't mind. Thank you, Lithoderm. OfOrebOrOfSinai (talk) 00:33, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Good work with this article. I've nominated it for 'Did You Know' on the main page. Raul654 (talk) 22:44, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for William Rush and His Model

Updated DYK query On May 22, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article William Rush and His Model, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

JamieS93 18:56, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You are now a Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, will be commencing a two-month trial at approximately 23:00, 2010 June 15 (UTC).

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under flagged protection. Flagged protection is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 20:14, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Blackamoors

Please explain your redirect of the article Blackamoors (decorative arts). The article does not only discuss sculptures, and indeed the term may not even be appropriate even to some three dimensional works. The article covers sculpture, decorative items, signs, flags etc. Paul B (talk) 12:26, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It's a bit rich that you lecture me on procedure, while clearly demonstrating that you have no knowledge of the relevant one. When two pages exist to be merged, a merger will inevitably leave the page history of the merged article at the redirect. That does not eliminate it. It can still be found at the redirect. That is not a cut-and-paste move to a new title. It's a merger. I suggest you read WP:merger. I know of no procedure to merge two distinct page revision histories. I can only assume that you did not check that the decorative arts page pre-existed the merger, nor did you read the contents of the page. So you now criticise me for not using the move button, which would not have been possible, while cutting and pasting yourself! However, thank you for adding the 'merge from' tag. Paul B (talk) 11:43, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Artists from Hawaii vs. Hawaii artists

Based on an edit you made to an article on my watchlist, I see that you have moved the entries from Category:Artists from Hawaii to Category:Hawaii artists. I'm not sure what practical difference this makes and I wanted to gain a better understanding of why this category should be structured differently from the other 49 states included in the parent Category:American artists by state. Perhaps we should rename the other categories to match the one for Hawaii, but we should probably try to be consistent across all states. Alansohn (talk) 15:21, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I created the category "Hawaii artists" for visual artists who were born in, have lived in, have worked in or been involved with Hawaii. 31 January 2009 Cydebot renamed the category "Artists from Hawaii", even though most of the artists listed are not FROM Hawaii, and some visited only briefly. I have no objection to the category “Artists from Hawaii", but it would be conceptually different from "Hawaii artists".Wmpearl (talk) 18:39, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
It appears that the parent Category:American artists by state is intended to organize artists *from* each of the 50 states, not artists who have worked or been involved with the state. For consistency with the 49 other state categories, would it be possible to segregate these artists by their connection to Hawaii, putting those who are from or who have lived in Hawaii in the Category:Artists from Hawaii, while those who visited only briefly and haven't lived in the state remain in Category:Hawaii artists? P.S. I shifted your reply here so that we can keep the conversation in one place. Alansohn (talk) 20:20, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with you completely Wmpearl (talk) 20:29, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Charles W. Bartlett

Dear Wmpearl:

I am a collector of Bartlett's paintings and in possession of the family's archives. Could you e-mail so we could correspond on the subject?

Darrel C. Karl darrel.karl@verizon.net — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.45.147.61 (talk) 02:27, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A beer for you!

Wmpearl
Wishing you a joyous Christmas and a prosperous new year!
BoringHistoryGuy (talk) 14:36, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Work on Richard Marquis

I have posted a fairly large rewrite/expansion of Richard Marquis, which you originated several years ago. I would welcome any comments or suggestions. Thanks! Punty Jon (talk) 21:53, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:'The Rabbi's Concert' by Fred A. Precht.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:'The Rabbi's Concert' by Fred A. Precht.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Majora (talk) 21:23, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Vincent Desiderio, Without Words, 1989.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Vincent Desiderio, Without Words, 1989.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:47, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Original Barnstar
Thank you for creating Theodore Wores!Zigzig20s (talk) 12:49, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:The goddess pele by arthur johnsen.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:The goddess pele by arthur johnsen.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:'Leopard Dance' by Melissa Miller, 1983.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:'Leopard Dance' by Melissa Miller, 1983.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:22, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Pelton - 'Vine Wood, 1913', oil on canvas, Bonhams & Butterfields San Francisco.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Pelton - 'Vine Wood, 1913', oil on canvas, Bonhams & Butterfields San Francisco.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:53, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Vincent Desiderio, Without Words, 1989.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Vincent Desiderio, Without Words, 1989.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:28, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tetsuo Ochikubo (1923-1970) - 'All Things Exist', c. 1960-1970, oil on canvas, HAA.JPG listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Tetsuo Ochikubo (1923-1970) - 'All Things Exist', c. 1960-1970, oil on canvas, HAA.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:32, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:'Composition No. 1', lithograph by Tetsuo Ochikubo, 1960.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:'Composition No. 1', lithograph by Tetsuo Ochikubo, 1960.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:32, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:'Conversation with the Wind', steel sculpture by Pietro Consagra, 1962, Museum of Fine Arts, Houston.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:'Conversation with the Wind', steel sculpture by Pietro Consagra, 1962, Museum of Fine Arts, Houston.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:34, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:'Constellation Mana' by Kumi Yamashita.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:'Constellation Mana' by Kumi Yamashita.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:36, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Yan Pei-Ming2005, oil on canvas, 'Eros Center, prostituée de Francfort '.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Yan Pei-Ming2005, oil on canvas, 'Eros Center, prostituée de Francfort '.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:39, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:'Corps', oil on canvas painting by Yan Pei-Ming.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:'Corps', oil on canvas painting by Yan Pei-Ming.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:39, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:‘Self-portrait (Mars)’, oil on canvas painting by Yan Pei-Ming, 2000, National Gallery of Australia.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:39, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:'Miss Everready', color woodcut by Adja Yunkers, 1952, private collection.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:'Miss Everready', color woodcut by Adja Yunkers, 1952, private collection.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:56, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:'Embroidered Halo', oil on canvas painting by Adja Yunkers, 1958, Hirshhorn Museum and Sculpture Garden.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:'Embroidered Halo', oil on canvas painting by Adja Yunkers, 1958, Hirshhorn Museum and Sculpture Garden.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:56, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:'Dropped Bra' by Tom Wesselman, 1980, --The Contemporary Museum, Honolulu--.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:'Dropped Bra' by Tom Wesselman, 1980, --The Contemporary Museum, Honolulu--.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:00, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:41, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Detail of 'Constellation Mana' by Kumi Yamashita.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Detail of 'Constellation Mana' by Kumi Yamashita.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:26, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:The Barker (Self Portrait) by Max Beckmann, 1921, Dayton Art Institute.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:The Barker (Self Portrait) by Max Beckmann, 1921, Dayton Art Institute.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — JJMC89(T·C) 03:02, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]