Wikipedia:Featured article review/Nigel Kneale/archive1
Nigel Kneale (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
| Toolbox |
|---|
- Notified: Angmering, WikiProject BBC, WikiProject Biography/Arts and entertainment, WikiProject Isle of Man, 2021-03-24
I am nominating this featured article for review because the article is bloated, with numerous paragraphs per section. The article also has unreliable sources (including IMDB) and inconsistent formatting of references. No edits have been made since I posted the notice. Z1720 (talk) 23:33, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
- This revision from the time this FA was nominated in 2007 indicates not much has change. Same amount of references, same section length. 👨x🐱 (talk) 23:50, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
- I've divide the sections further so they're not bloated anymore, but for some the body text is now all italicized. I don't know what happen, I checked and I didn't see any incomplete italics in the source code to cause that. What happen? 👨x🐱 (talk) 00:20, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
- @HumanxAnthro: - I have corrected the italics issue. There was an issue with incomplete italics in the Halloween 3 section. Hog Farm Talk 14:29, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
- I will say, however, that the IMDb cite issue was far less severe than I thought it would be judging by the comments made. IMDb cites were used only a very, very small minority of the time, and it turns out we probably didn't need as all they did was cite release date, Kneale and other actors and filmmakers for credits in productions. Plus, all the other sources are HQ and reliable, so this article may not be in the red zone after all. 👨x🐱 (talk) 16:19, 28 April 2021 (UTC)