Jump to content

Template:Did you know nominations/Animal aggression

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by ಮಲ್ನಾಡಾಚ್ ಕೊಂಕ್ಣೊ (talk | contribs) at 09:29, 5 May 2021 (Fixed obsolete html tag Lint errors). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by PFHLai (talk) 05:51, 8 October 2012 (UTC)

Animal aggression

[edit]

Created/expanded by Brambleberry of RiverClan (talk). Self nom at 16:12, 28 September 2012 (UTC)

  • Very long, well-cited, completely new article. The hook is OK and is confirmed by an off-line reference, which is AGF. --Peter I. Vardy (talk) 15:19, 4 October 2012 (UTC)
Okay, thank you. I haven't had internet access in three days, so sorry for any lateness. Brambleberry of RiverClanmeow 19:26, 4 October 2012 (UTC)
  • The hook isn't quite confirmed in the article. While the hook says "a family", the article is much less specific, merely saying "parents", "children", and "juveniles". Reading the article, I thought this could have been a group of parents guarding their children -- several families, not just one. If the original, offline source refers to a single family in Whitehorse, then the article should make it clear that only one family was involved. If it refers to more than one family, then the hook needs to be modified. BlueMoonset (talk) 22:31, 4 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Sorry; when I reviewed this, I thought that "parents" and "their children" was near enough to "a family". I'm sure this can be easily adjusted. --Peter I. Vardy (talk) 08:06, 5 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Thank you for bringing this to my attention. It has been fixed. Brambleberry of RiverClanmeow 21:14, 5 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Suggesting a slightly different wording for clarification:
  • for ALT1. The ext of the article has been modified to make the hook fit closer, and the new wording is more concise. --Peter I. Vardy (talk) 10:08, 7 October 2012 (UTC)