Jump to content

Talk:Non-penetrative sex

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Ernne (talk | contribs) at 17:34, 6 May 2021 (Why it was not removed?). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Template:Vital article

WikiProject iconSexology and sexuality C‑class High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Sexology and sexuality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of human sexuality on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
CThis article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 31 August 2020 and 18 December 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Mcox19 (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Liliapearljackson, Ig510. This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 1 September 2020 and 18 December 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Justacrow, Caitlinmacneill (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Espy Neville.

Photos

I cannot see photos Rajput joginder (talk) 09:28, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Mutual masturbation" is misleading

Although an increasing number of people misuses the word "masturbation" to describe manual stimulation of genitals regardless of who does it, the original meaning of "masturbation" clearly points out that it's a sexual act performed on oneself. Therefore, the term "mutual masturbation" is self-contradictory. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:A31A:E140:1E00:DDF9:816D:E0F2:E884 (talk) 15:42, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Which isn't our problem to fix, see WP:RGW. Tgeorgescu (talk) 01:01, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Well, whoever authored this article believes that tribbing is somehow different from frotting. In reality, though, they mean the same thing: literally rubbing [genitals]. Only difference is that one refers to females and is derived from Greek, while the other refers to males and is derived from French. Not really rocket science. Looks like the author or the patroller of this article has watched too much so-called lesbian porn and believes that those lesbians are masturbating. Normally, masturbation means using one's hand (or, occassionally, someone else's hand). Anyway, good luck learning about human sexuality by wacthing "lesbian porn". Bye. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.252.60.247 (talkcontribs)
What in the world are you going on about? Tribbing and frotting are two different things, by your very own admission. They are both frottage, but are different types of frottage. And as seen, tribbing is not in the "Mutual masturbation" section. It's in the "Exclusively non-penetrative" section. And so is frot. Yes, it's currently not mentioned in the "Frottage" section, but it doesn't need to be. The section tells us, "Frottage is the general term for the act of rubbing any part of the body, including the buttocks, the breasts, abdomen, thighs, feet, hands, legs and sexual organs against the sexual organ of another person; this is done whether naked or clothed and is more commonly known as dry humping or dry sex. When frottage includes genital-genital rubbing, it is sometimes called genito-genital or GG rubbing." Obviously, that includes tribbing. I should remove your post as a WP:Not a forum violation. Flyer22 Frozen (talk) 05:16, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Why it was not removed?

Why did no one delete the painting of a monk having sex with a woman? I thought it would be considered offensive material in Wikipedia since there are a lot of Catholics in Wikipedia who would be shocked to see the painting, the monk is naked and having sex with a woman which is against Catholicism --Eddiitt0 (talk) 16:35, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NOTCENSORED, "Attempting to ensure that articles and images will be acceptable to all readers, or will adhere to general social or religious norms, is incompatible with the purposes of an encyclopedia." I see you also posted this on 4 or more article talk pages. --GRuban (talk) 16:47, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I posted this on 3 talk pages because I want to know why didn't Catholics delete images from the articles? I'm not Catholic myself but I thought maybe some Catholics would say that Wikipedia is misrepresenting Catholics and saying that monks love doggy style and like to masturbate, are you Catholic? --Eddiitt0 (talk) 17:34, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]