Talk:1993 Football League Second Division play-off final

Football: England C‑class Low‑importance

	Association football portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	English football portal This article is supported by the English football task force (assessed as Low-importance).

1993 Football League Second Division play-off final is currently a Sports and recreation good article nominee. Nominated by Echetus Xe at 23:30, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

An editor has placed this article on hold to allow improvements to be made to satisfy the good article criteria. Recommendations have been left on the review page, and editors have seven days to address these issues. Improvements made in this period will influence the reviewer's decision whether or not to list the article as a good article.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:1993 Football League Second Division play-off Final/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: The Rambling Man (talk · contribs) 21:26, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments (and suggest these are implemented, in principle, in the other GAN)

"while the teams placed from" -> "while those placed from"
- Done.Echetus Xe 15:55, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
"table partook in play-off semi-finals; the winners of these semi-finals " -> "took part in play-offs; the winners of the play-off semi-finals..."
- Done.Echetus Xe 15:55, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
"West Brom had" stick with formal names or introduce nicknames.
- Done.Echetus Xe 15:55, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Same for Vale.
- Done.Echetus Xe 15:55, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Link referee in lead.
- Done.Echetus Xe 15:55, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
"The pivotal point of the match" a bit OR.
- Done.Echetus Xe 15:55, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Link sent off.
- Done.Echetus Xe 15:55, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
"goals difference" -> "goal difference" and link.
- Done.Echetus Xe 15:55, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I would use the sports table module for the league, as seen in 1991 Football League Fourth Division play-off Final for example. Seems more accessible etc.
- Done.Echetus Xe 15:55, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
"the first leg was" -> "first match of the two-legged tie.
- Done.Echetus Xe 15:55, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
"Giant striker..." avoid such commentary.
- Done.Echetus Xe 15:55, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Play-off semifinal reports seem to be unreferenced.
Done.Echetus Xe 15:55, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
"1992–93 season" I know it's red linked anyway, but put the "season" into the pipe.
- Done.Echetus Xe 15:55, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
"tally of namesake" not really requied.
- Done.Echetus Xe 15:55, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
"42,300 Baggies" don't use nicknames unless you explain them.
- Done.Echetus Xe 15:55, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
"Vale showing patience and possession" according to?
- Done.Echetus Xe 15:55, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
"a scissors kick" link.
- Done.Echetus Xe 15:55, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
"by Ian Taylor tipped" overlink.
- Done.Echetus Xe 15:55, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
"used his acrobatic skills" bit too commentatorish.
- Done.Echetus Xe 15:55, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Link foul.
- Done.Echetus Xe 15:55, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
"dismissal" link.
- Done.Echetus Xe 15:55, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
"third Englishman" what about non-Englishmen?
- The source didn't mention them.--Echetus Xe 15:55, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
"for the "Baggies" final goal" nickname
- Done.Echetus Xe 15:55, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
"from six yards" convert.
- Done.Echetus Xe 15:55, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Could crop the Ardilles image so it doesn't leak down into the refs.
Done.EchetusXe 15:55, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- "£2 million" non-breaking space.
Done.--Echetus Xe 15:56, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
"afterwards... my" non-breaking space before the ellpsis.
Done.--Echetus Xe 15:56, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
"after barely surviving" can we be factual and explain what that really meant?
- Done.Echetus Xe 15:55, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
"Red carded Peter Swan" not necessary, not even sure this sentence is required.
- Done.Echetus Xe 15:55, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think www and .com are needed for websites.
- Done.Echetus Xe 15:55, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

THat's a first pass, I'll put it on hold while we deal with these and then do another run-through. The Rambling Man (Stay alert! Control the virus! Save lives!!!!) 10:22, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

- Okay thanks, I've taken a crack at that.--Echetus Xe 15:55, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I think this is good enough now for GA, I made a few cosmetic tweaks, so I'm happy to promote. I'll take a look at the other one of yours as well, perhaps you could pre-empt my review by considering some of the general points above on that article too? Cheers. The Rambling Man (Stay alert! Control the virus! Save lives!!!!) 06:58, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]