User talk:Bubwater

AfD nomination of Tamara Bane Gallery

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Tamara Bane Gallery. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tamara Bane Gallery. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:10, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 04:35, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

Tamara Bane Gallery

If you want this article to be kept, you need to provide some reliable sources. Looking over the really long blocks of text you posted at the AfD, I notice you say that you've researched but you haven't actually shown that research. Try adding some references to the article and when writing keep in mind our policy in regards to biographies of living persons. AniMate 09:04, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

December 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add content (particularly if you change facts and figures), as you have to the article Manga, please cite a reliable source for the content you're adding or changing. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Wikipedia:Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. —Farix (t | c) 23:46, 20 December 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:1EmbezzledArt HS94.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:1EmbezzledArt HS94.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Fred the Oyster (talk) 02:27, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:1 Embezzled Art HS94.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:1 Embezzled Art HS94.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Fred the Oyster (talk) 02:28, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:2 EmbezzledArts.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:2 EmbezzledArts.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore will not be able to answer your questions.

• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used once again.

• If you received this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.

• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to somewhere on your talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 04:02, 14 March 2010 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hajime_Sorayama

I noticed that the area of External Links has been subjected to a removal/tampered with/deleted of " Official Website sorayama.net born circa 1999" in the External Links leaving only one younger official website behind that may cause a mess / cause misinformation "as is". The deletion(s) maybe started within the past year or so. There may have been other removals in the External Links that went unnoticed as well which would cause historical/ongoing confusion and potential mess. Noted below are three known and viable Sorayama related Official Websites pertaining to wikipedia being sorayama.net / sorayama.com / sorayama.jp each owned by different interest(s).

Also, I am uncertain if similar deletions/removals of External Links of Official website(s) unfavorably effecting vital factual events of merit can be traced as well over the past 3 years or so. I do not think there were any changes but if there is a way to check that it may help.

Note below are some few of many references and all are in context of the official archives; those sources outside officially acceptable archives, actual published books, "real" news articles and wikipedia are researched to determine that my posts are objective/accurate to use on wikipedia as I have done on this for about a decade as I recall. Other lessor reliable source material e.g. galleries/dealers with active physical shows are excluded from wikipedia for obvious commercial reasons unless actual physical arts/media/books are provided for research review in an encyclopedia manner that conforms to wikipedia standard.

• http://www.nytimes.com/2016/01/16/fashion/mens-style/at-pitti-uomo-angles-of-approach.html?_r=0
• https://web.archive.org/web/*/http://sorayama.net
• https://web.archive.org/web/*/http://sorayama.com
• http://sorayama.jp/news/

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Bubwater (talk • contribs) 18:55, 28 November 2016 (UTC)Bubwater (talk) 05:49, 29 November 2016 (UTC)

Thank you Yintan and other wikipedians for looking over this matter. The removal / deletion / changes in the External Links area (that possibly occurred this month and in the recent past) is by some unknown mobile phone user who made this deletion and is historically and currently creating confusion where no confusion exists. To be clear there are multiple Official Websites (I have seen at least about 5 / maybe 6 sites) and each one of the three you mention here is valid so they would be fine for the External Links but the problem remains that a possibly new mobile phone user has made unfavorable and inaccurate change . The longest standing Official Websites ongoing (unless owners of such website viably infrom you/me otherwise) are sorayama.com, sorayama.net and a younger one sorayama.jp It appears someone interested in having only the young Offical Website maybe made this change/removals that are unfavorable and inaccurate. This to history and ongoing events. Where the sorayama.net / sorayama.com / sorayama.jp Official Websites was removed/added/changed I can inform you that more likely than not all 3 remain Official Website(s). I can say 100% that until such time there is an official mutually agreed upon change by any/all interested parties ie owners of the assets/websites of the three sites (Yintan mentions) inform me/wikipedia in writing they no longer own or have changed their respective websites which are all valid Official Websites. (ie as it stands there is no change to the designation(s) of these three Official Websites you noted). I like it if wikipedians/wikipedia watch/ restore this External Links area back for sorayama.net to be in its place and help maintain it.

Bubwater (talk) 05:49, 29 November 2016 (UTC)

Bubwater (talk) 05:49, 29 November 2016 (UTC)

Copyright problem on CRH plc

Material you included in the above article back in October 2017 appears to have been copied from the copyright web page http://www.cleveland.com/court-justice/index.ssf/2014/04/jury_awards_39_million_to_fami.html. Copying text directly from a source is a copyright violation. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, the content had to be removed. Please leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions or if you think I made a mistake. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 15:49, 22 December 2017 (UTC)

April 2020

Hello, I'm StonyBrook. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Rockland County, New York, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. StonyBrook (talk) 20:24, 28 April 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:26, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

ANI notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. ‑‑Volteer1 (talk) 19:00, 19 May 2021 (UTC)

May 2021

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

You have been disruptive for years and your recent edits are incoherent. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 19:40, 19 May 2021 (UTC)

NFT art related blocks and use of personal data blocks of late May 2021

Hello Cullen328 (Jim) and "Sting wikipedia staff,

I want to apologize for my medical situation and outbursts that stirred things up for your staff of academics and international artists. This one federal court case about before 2011 under the California federal courts including the Supreme Court of Appeals in Pasadena has set off what is termed Hyper Mania stress that I have not had for a year or more. At that time before about 2011 we were under physical and mental threat from a set of extremly bad actors including a gallery on the West Coast who brought convicted felons (Operation Bullpen and Mr. Riccio who was part of the OJ Simpson mrrder trials asset violence sales of OJ memorabilia aftermath gun threat incident). The defendants brought this mess of danger into the process that threatened us including visits to our offices ( we had to report to NYC police on record). They brought 2 convicted criminals and what later was a Satanic witch group to threaten us during court. ( I know this sounds nuts but it is fact and known to be a problems reported on in the LA Times with prosecutors on the west coast who were also victimized).

My wife and I and other family members had to fight against a slew of attorneys of very high power (one named Kaplan and a high powered bankrutpcy attorney skilled at defending bad debt people in LA area, the other not so important attoreny is named Washor) who stole originals of our artist Sorayama with the gallery who did the same thing called conversion including their perjury in court about the promisory note about what they claimed was a low level employee theft never proven).

In the end we won the case because of lying/abusive acts in the courtroom by defendant side and credit mostly to the late Federal Justice Judge Florence Marie Cooper who also sat as trustee on one of West Coast famous art museums (maybe Moca ear her court). I cannot name the actual defendant(s) because of the settlement but may be able to do so through an attorney or wikipedia expert. It is repprted in professional media like the LA Times and others including in Japan. Easy for you to find if needed.

My article on this subject won Google Top 5% knol awards. This along with the media reports my wife and Sorayama artist about it. Your website and others are open source and provide expert help to me/others as you just did with this absurd block I caused in just days. O should not have put in personal names of those causing me terrible stress with risky NFT highly irregualr documentation they attempted to get me to publish and hand out to investors/artists. My situation is called a mild case of hyper anxiety attacks that did not occur for the past year. However, this phishing scam, long hours of work by the scammers (I have their documents and logs of SMS/ZOOM etc. triggered my anxiety as they appear to be from one family that associates to the art, NFT and movie business hard money lenders and producers on the West coast and in UK. My sister and friends are trying to get me to go back on a sedative but know this I am always a feevent truthful defender of the arts and I am used as expert like this group who scammed me (documents will be sent to you as needed). Please call me as needed. Regards Bubwater "call me John" Bubwater (talk) 01:52, 25 May 2021 (UTC)