User talk:Zinnober9

Thanks

Good report here or thereabouts. Thanks for keeping your eyes open! Cyphoidbomb (talk) 02:35, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sophronius S. Landt

My apologies for my editing of the Sophronius S. Landt article; the Wisconsin Blue Book 1895, pg. 673, biographical sketch of Sophronius Landt mentioned he lived in the village of Friendship, Wisconsin in Adams County, Wisconsin. I should had been more clearer with the editing and I apologized and take full responsibility. I have rewrote the sentence and acknowledged your good faith edit. Again my apologies. Thank you-RFD (talk) 22:49, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. You know Wisconsin better than I do, but I'd learned just enough from fixing some other articles with the same clarification need that you helped with right before, so I figured you'd gotten the wires crossed with the name and the county on that edit. Thank you for knowing/finding a source that specified which the correct one was. Best wishes! Zinnober9 (talk) 06:16, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You-RFD (talk) 10:30, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

~~Hi, about your accusation of a block evasion~~
To my knowledge, I never evaded a block. I created an account from my IP address that another user who had harassed me for more than a year now had an issue with, to open up a more consistent channel of discussion. I had made my edits, and many of them have been left up for months at a time, with collaborative edits by a number of other users, on the fashion section of 2010s in culture, as well as in Fashion design and Street Style. Other edits of mine were categorizations and mere typo corrections. Many of the edits I've made that you've reverted were literally corrections of grammatical errors. Which makes no sense.

That page has information that has been there for months now, and it’s kept to the standards of other editors who have edited those pages. Do you have another reason for reverting all of my edits? Binksternet even deleted content other users added, that included some of my content, to attack me. He swore at me on my talk page, accused me of racism, deleted other people's content, and held my content to standards not matched by the rest of the page. If you disagree with anything I've added or altered, please use the talk page first. Thank you. Velvetlaptop (talk) 01:50, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Above user is a now confirmed sockpuppet and should be ignored in all matters except if needed for further socking evidence. Zinnober9 (talk) 04:26, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest guide

Thank you Zinnober9! I am NEW to editing and am trying to minimally update the Citylink wiki page so it's factual. I will only update facts and not remove controversial things (even tho it's tempting lol) CitylinkIdahoKC (talk) 19:16, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Correct typos in one click

New list arrived, every feedback is appreciated. Uziel302 (talk) 18:37, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Frostbite revert

RE: this revert I'll try and be a bit more descriptive in my antivandalism edit summaries, sorry CiphriusKane (talk) 01:46, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@CiphriusKane: My apologies, I was a bit too quick on the button. Your edit came up in red on the recent changes page and was tagged vandalism, so I thought it was, but after I clicked revert, I realized your edit was reverting the previous editor's vandalism and yours was valid. A clear edit summary is very helpful, so that would be great, but I messed up on this one. Thank you for your antivandalism editing! Zinnober9 (talk) 02:08, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Revert of talk page warnings

Hi Zinnober9! I saw that you made this edit to KillTimeEO's user talk page. Although I agree that the edit is very... "trollsy" (and strange, as you put it), users, by policy, are allowed to remove warnings from their own user talk pages. The things that they can't remove would be declined unblock requests regarding a block that's currently active, and some other things. Yeah, don't worry if you didn't know about this policy. I found out about it the exact same way that you're probably finding out about it now... someone had to message me and tell me. :-) Anyways, I thought I'd let you know. Cheers! ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 02:49, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Oshwah: I was aware of that, but I was thinking that the use of their fowl language superseded that, and I mighta gotten a little trigger happy after I saw they'd refactored the first editor's comment earlier this evening. I appreciate your message however, as not all know about that, as is clear from some of the other editors this evening editing that page. I hope my last edit statement on their page helps calm things in that manner. Zinnober9 (talk) 03:45, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No worries, it happens to the best of us. :-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 04:27, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Another thank you

Sad that people like the one that edited Ed Gein COD to Covid 19 do not take Wikipedia as serious as those of us who care. Good catch. Thank you. -- Naaman Brown (talk) 15:53, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

		The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		Thank you for your efforts in stopping vandalism! Necctaylor (chat) 21:28, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Need assistance

My talk page is being continually reverted back and "vandalized" by 47.241.192.40. Please assist me to get rid of this user. Mr. Pekka Stranker (talk) 06:32, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]