Jump to content

Talk:History of Riga

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Vecrumba (talk | contribs) at 16:49, 2 June 2021 (→Citations needed: Reply). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconLatvia Start‑class High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Latvia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Latvia related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LatviaWikipedia:WikiProject LatviaTemplate:WikiProject LatviaLatvia
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Now that this has been cut and pasted from Riga, the history there might be judiciously condensed?--Wetman (talk) 21:41, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

?

This sentence is not only grammatical, but also historical mistake. What failed? What Lutheranism and Thirty Years' War has to do with it?

"...in Riga and southern Livonia failed as in 1621, Riga and the outlying fortress of Daugavgriva came under the rule of Gustavus Adolphus, King of Sweden, who intervened in the Thirty Years' War not only for political and economic gain but also in favor of German Lutheran Protestantism..."

P.S. why not to mention Peace of Riga 1921? Mikołajski (talk) 21:00, 4 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

And one more - is Lutheranism a "German" religion? I smelln some groß mistake. This city deserve better history article in Wiki. Come on... Mikołajski (talk) 03:01, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

History as part of Riga FA effort

With the proposed effort to try to FA Riga, I started to work through the history section. Of course I made what I updated even longer (!) so I put that here while abbreviating for Riga. A couple of things still left to have here and not there. VЄСRUМВА  ☎  14:26, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Next section to be abridged cut over (Under Bishop Albert). Comments welcome. VЄСRUМВА  ♪  22:45, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on History of Riga. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:55, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on History of Riga. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:46, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Citations needed

In my opinion, this page has multiple issues. 1. First of all, there are too few references and even the first chapter, who is appearently full of them, needs to be updated. You can’t verify any single quote because there are no url available: the only two available are in Latvian and it’s impossible to verify them for a non-Latvian speaker. 2. After the chapter about the Hanseatic League, you can’t find many references. The page becomes more like a list of events instead of a clear and structured reconstruction. Plus, they need to be expanded. -X3SNW8 (talk) 13:00, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, I don't have downloads for sources I used in the first section of the history rewrite.
When it comes to subjects not widely covered in English language, think of it as an advantage that there are editors willing to translate. Question for you on "impossible to verify" sources--has there been any discussion of editors posting original-source-language excerpts in article talk where they can be cut and pasted into Google Translate? The translations for less populous languages are often less than perfect, but it would at least provide some measure of verification for the motivated.
I agree that the remainder of the article remains adequate regarding content and citations, however, I expect it will be at least another year before I can return here for the next installment (and to add more meat to my citations).
VєсrumЬа ►TALK 16:48, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Talk:History_of_Riga&oldid=1026498239"