Nominator's rationale: This category would therefore be more useful if moved up one notch and made a non-diffusing child of Category:Governors and heads of sub-national entities rather than a container category. Not all categories in Category:Governors and heads of sub-national entities by country have a female subcategory. It should be allowed to include individual women holder of a such office in countries that do not have a national gendered sub-category. WP:FINALRUNG seems to apply: if Foo has only had one woman governor in its history, she should be placed in Governors of Foo and Women governors categories, rather than a new Women governors of Foo. Place Clichy (talk) 13:45, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: As of 2018, this is the name of the competition and which is what we should use for the category structure going forwards. Simeon (talk) 08:29, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hmmmm. Yeah - that would make some sense. There is another problem with the first category as it stands, as technically Pitcairn isn't a "nation", so what does "non-national" mean in that context? Grutness...wha?01:33, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Category:Organisations associated with the Bengal Renaissance
The association with these organisations must be pretty slight: not a single article in this category even mentions the Bengal Renaissance in the text. (4 of the articles do list have Template:Bengal Renaissance, but the reason for including that template is equally unclear.) The child category has content on this topic though and should be kept in the tree. - RevelationDirect (talk) 00:54, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
