Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ramon Ortiz (disambiguation)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 11:58, 12 June 2021 (Fixed old behaviour of link-wrapping font tags in a signature (Task 1)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 11:58, 12 June 2021 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed old behaviour of link-wrapping font tags in a signature (Task 1))
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn without opposition The Bushranger One ping only 20:36, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
AfDs for this article:
- Ramon Ortiz (disambiguation) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Only two articles for Ramon Ortiz exist; a third one was deleted. One of the Ortiz's is a primary topic, so a hatnote is all that is necessary. Sanfranciscogiants17 (talk) 11:25, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. Sanfranciscogiants17 (talk) 11:25, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep I've restored the wrongly deleted third entry (use Control F (find function) at article and you'll see him a couple of times, so meeting MOS:DABMENTION). This is a dab with three entries and a valid see also. Boleyn (talk) 11:33, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Ramón Ortiz (note the verifiable spelling) appears to be notable in his own right, moreover, as a documented historical figure whose biography is in history books. Uncle G (talk) 12:02, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2012 July 7. Snotbot t • c » 11:36, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Per Uncle G Theopolisme TALK 15:03, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Sorry, I can't believe I missed the references to Ortiz on the Basilica page. Nomination withdrawn, and thanks for looking at the page more carefully than I did. Sanfranciscogiants17 (talk) 19:59, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.