Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Surface Innovations
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 16:18, 13 June 2021 (Fixed old behaviour of link-wrapping font tags in a signature (Task 1)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 16:18, 13 June 2021 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed old behaviour of link-wrapping font tags in a signature (Task 1))
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. The Bushranger One ping only 02:16, 14 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Surface Innovations (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. Cliff Smith 18:36, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
New journal, too young to have established notability, article creation premature. As far as I can see, not a single article has been published yet. No independent sources, not indexed in any major selective database: does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NJournals. Guillaume2303 (talk) 13:11, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:TOOSOON. —David Eppstein (talk) 06:51, 28 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 18:15, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jenks24 (talk) 19:49, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete has not yet had time to establish notability per WP:GNG or WP:NJournals. ---- Steve Quinn (talk) 04:36, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.