Jump to content

User talk:Erp

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by MediaWiki message delivery (talk | contribs) at 15:14, 3 July 2021 (→WikiProject Scouting Newsletter: July 2021: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Welcome!

Hello, Erp, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --Duncharris (Duncharris) 04:24, 7 February 2006

/Archive 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited World Association of Girl Guides and Girl Scouts, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Swahili. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

RfC announce: Religion in infoboxes

There is an RfC at Template talk:Infobox#RfC: Religion in infoboxes concerning what should be allowed in the religion entry in infoboxes. Please join the discussion and help us to arrive at a consensus on this issue. --Guy Macon (talk) 22:16, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Harriet Findlay, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Scottish Unionist Party. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:34, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jordan, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Rugby and World Cup. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:24, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Religion in Kiribati, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Church of God. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:37, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Religion in Germany

Please consider moving your comment at talk:Religion in Germany to the "Pie chart" section. Thanks JimRenge (talk) 00:46, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you're still doing Scout stuff...

Is there an existing list of GSUSA councils? Thanks!--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 07:31, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, it has been hard finding an official list that is easy to copy. The Find a Council page (www.girlscouts.org/en/about-girl-scouts/join/council-finder.html) has a list under a drop down menu but that list is pulled from a script which is listed at www.girlscouts.org/councilfinder/ajax_results.asp?short=yes I did some neatening and have (short names):

One could use this in combo with (for full names) Category:Local_councils_of_the_Girl_Scouts_of_the_USA --Erp (talk) 15:27, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! I'm on it next weekend!--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 14:38, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I've put up new maps for GS Virginia and Georgia and will be putting up one for Tennessee soon. --Erp (talk) 02:55, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Does anyone else tend to GSUSA council info? I'd love to see some of that expanded. --evrik (talk) 23:20, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Stanford University student housing, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Swahili. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:47, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ann Clare Brokaw for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ann Clare Brokaw is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ann Clare Brokaw until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 11:13, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject United States/The 50,000 Challenge

You are invited to participate in the 50,000 Challenge, aiming for 50,000 article improvements and creations for articles relating to the United States. This effort began on November 1, 2016 and to reach our goal, we will need editors like you to participate, expand, and create. See more here!

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:39, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Erp. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of David L. Huestis

Hello Erp,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged David L. Huestis for deletion in response to your request.

If you didn't intend to make such a request and don't want the article to be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. ubiquity (talk) 18:27, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 5 December

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:26, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi!

Do you know how to fix the spaced ndashes in the Sir John Gladstone, 1st Baronet infobox? Thanks! --ExperiencedArticleFixer (talk) 16:08, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I did the same as you before: moved it, in this case to the navbox. Thanks. --ExperiencedArticleFixer (talk) 16:26, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Brock Turner

I have given up on my first edit request and am going to try again in a new section. Please review.--104.197.82.38 (talk) 04:00, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Loss of Explorer Posts

I know you put down citation needed at the end of the article. I'm just speaking from personal experience with the LAPD posts. I volunteer with an explorer competition in California. We had the LAPD cadets come to our comp. for several years. In 2012 or 13 they notified us they were not coming back unless we got different insurance. The LAPD told us the LAFD were in the Caryeastwood (talk) 07:20, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately personal experience alone can't be used as a reference. It can be used as a pointer that proper references do exist and should be hunted down. Note that insurance might have been an issue if the BSA insurance did not cover non-BSA participants or was considered insufficient; it need not have had to do with BSA policies on gays and god. Note also explanations can get mangled when passed person to person. --Erp (talk) 13:32, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fingering characerization

re special:diff/763849717 you mentioned:

"possibly because you wanted to link to an article on digital penetration which is solely about the consensual act and that plays down that this particular digital penetration was not consensual"

That appears to be an oversight, I figured it was common sense that people knew that sexual acts were sexual assault if not consented to.

I just made this edit adding a source showing that digital penetration without consent is considered sexual assault from ~12-13 years ago: https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?diff=764094538&oldid=760713940

With that now present, is it still objectionable to link to the article when describing what happened? Ranze (talk) 01:38, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Neither vandalism nor a test edit.

I monitor links to a number of websites which are, by robust consensus, entirely inappropriate as sources. That job is made harder when sandboxes and user pages include links. Making the link list shorter saves time when looking for new citations to inappropriate sites that then need to be removed. These links ar eof no benefit in sandboxes and drafts because if those pages ever became articles, the links would have to come out. Guy (Help!) 06:48, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@JzG: True but it would help to have a more expansive explanation in the edit comment. "Predatory" for someone encountering it for the first time is not very informative and my understanding is that editing someone else's sandbox without invitation is not polite; perhaps "source marked as from a predatory journal, see x" would be more helpful. Note the surrounding text had already mentioned it and the others as possibly unreliable (this sandbox is more a collection of notes from a while back that went no where due to no reliable sources, I now marked for my own record that this particular one is unreliable). --Erp (talk) 14:50, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
There was a wikilink, though, in the template. And that is pretty much what the template says. Guy (Help!) 15:00, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is to inform you that an attempt is being made to overturn an RfC that you voted on

This is to inform you that an attempt is being made to overturn an RfC that you voted on (2 RfCs, actually, one less than six months ago and another a year ago). The new RfC is at:

Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)#RfC: Allow private schools to be characterized as non-affiliated as well as religious, in infobox?

Specifically, it asks that "religion = none" be allowed in the infobox.

The first RfC that this new RfC is trying to overturn is:

The result of that RfC was "unambiguously in favour of omitting the parameter altogether for 'none' " and despite the RfC title, additionally found that "There's no obvious reason why this would not apply to historical or fictional characters, institutions etc.", and that nonreligions listed in the religion entry should be removed when found "in any article".

The second RfC that this new RfC is trying to overturn is:

The result of that RfC was that the "in all Wikipedia articles, without exception, nonreligions should not be listed in the Religion= parameter of the infobox.".

Note: I am informing everyone who commented on the above RfCs, whether they supported or opposed the final consensus. --Guy Macon (talk) 03:39, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

that guy...

Thank you for trying to fight the good fight-that guy is a POV pusher...--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 22:58, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

True but he does sometimes seem to have some good points; he does seem to have been correct in some of the Masinissa entry. It takes time to learn to evaluate one's own biases (and we all have biases) and also to properly document. Given that the ancient kingdom of Numidia corresponded somewhat to modern coastal Algeria (though it also covered part of modern Tunisia) and that Masinissa united and then ruled Numidia for some 54 years, it is not a surprise that he seemingly plays a large part in the Algerian national mythos (think George Washington in the US mythos). Ideally articles about Algeria need a critical mass of editors that can read French and/or Arabic (due to modern Algerian history much of the research is likely to be in one or the other of those languages). Unfortunately also the French wikipedia version of the article is also lacking citations. On couscous it looks like there is an edit war going on in the French version of the article also on the same issue. I can't read Arabic so I'm not sure what is going on in that version of the article (though less editing)--Erp (talk) 01:01, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Undid one of your revisions

Thought I'd give you a headsup about this if you weren't watching that page. IMO it's a bit like editing the page on California to say "usually considered part of the US", but in any case, I think text like that in the intro on a European country's page really should come with some citations about why it's not sometimes considered a European country. --Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason 23:17, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please see Iceland's talk page

Talk:Iceland#The_back_.26_forth_minor_edit_war_about_what_continent_Iceland_is_in.2C_and_what_a_continent_is is relevant to your interests. --Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason 19:02, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

What ever your recent edit was

at National Statuary Hall Collection it don't work. Einar aka Carptrash (talk) 05:10, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DRN notice: Jesus

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! Jtrevor99 (talk) 14:15, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Stanford companies

I can't believe you removed SGI and SUN. Do you know what you're doing here? Dicklyon (talk) 05:14, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I went a bit too fast through the last section of the alphabet. SGI, SUN, and Yahoo! now back. However I do think the list should be more of significant examples rather than exhaustive. --Erp (talk) 05:33, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Erp. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Jordan Governorates image map

Template:Jordan Governorates image map has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 16:29, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Portola Valley, California, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Woodside High School (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Erp. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Simon Jacques Rochard

Hello, Erp. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, Draft:Simon Jacques Rochard.

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. — JJMC89 (T·C) 19:45, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Simon Jacques Rochard has been accepted

Simon Jacques Rochard, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Gbawden (talk) 08:47, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wish

Hello. Help improve and copy edit for article Maureen Wroblewitz. Thanks you. Tauthanhhuyen34 (talk) 03:44, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ignore. User is a sock puppet. – Jonesey95 (talk) 21:13, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Christiana Riot has been accepted

Christiana Riot, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 00:44, 30 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Re

It's not an issue don't worry, also I have a tendency to be to lazy to read my talk messages sometimes so. Saturn star (talk) 17:54, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Today's Wikipedian 10 years ago

Awesome
Ten years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:02, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:04, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Foothills Park, Palo Alto concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Foothills Park, Palo Alto, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:29, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Foothills Park, Palo Alto has been accepted

Foothills Park, Palo Alto, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DGG ( talk ) 06:18, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Fry family (chocolate) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fry family (chocolate) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fry family (chocolate) (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — Maile (talk) 19:44, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:WAGGGS-WOSMWestHemMap-World-2.svg

Notice

The file File:WAGGGS-WOSMWestHemMap-World-2.svg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused free use image with no clear use on the Wiki.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. fuzzy510 (talk) 08:58, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:14, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Scouting Newsletter: May 2021

WikiProject Scouting | May 2021


Notes for May:

  • Congratulations to our Barnstar awardees!
  • Interested in coordinating a zoom meeting? Please let us know.


Other ways to participate:

--evrik (talk) 20:45, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You're doing great!

Thanks for standing your ground with your edits on the Swaminarayan Akshardham (North America) article. In ensuring people are informed to the best of their ability, you're making the world a better place. Keep up the good work! SuperTah (talk) 12:19, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Scouting Newsletter: July 2021

WikiProject Scouting | July 2021


Things to watch for:


Other ways to participate:

--evrik (talk) 17:32, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Erp&oldid=1031772933"