User talk:Nomadicghumakkad

Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8

This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by .

I have been away

Got back today! And will get to all messages etc. Sorry for such long gap. Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 10:05, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Draft: Too Beautiful to Die

Hi, you rejected my draft of the Italian Giallo film "Too Beautiful to Die." Confused. I included several references, more than what I have seen on similar pages about less popular films. In any case, I added a link to the IMDB page of the film, so there are web and print references now, including the link to online reviews I had included earlier. I hope this will suffice! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nyingpo (talk • contribs) 08:38, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Draft: YesWeHack

Hi there, and thanks for reviewing my draft 2 days ago. I understand that there is not enough significant coverage in my draft to publish it. The issue I encounter is that the company I'm writing about is French, so full and relatable articles about it are written in French. I was wondering if I could add them? Or if references should only be in English? In the meantime, I've rewritten the article and tried to improve it. Any pieces of advice would be much appreciated! Thanks much. Mathbsnd (talk) 12:10, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Mathbsnd, French language or any other language is totally acceptable. The only challenge with sources in other language that I particularly face is that it is not easy to determine if it is a reliable source or not. BUT, that doesn't mean that any editor should not use them. So bring them on and we will figure out. Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 16:14, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Nomadicghumakkad, and thanks for your answer. I added a few references in French in which YesWeHack is the main subject, hoping it will improve the quality of press coverage. Should I submit the draft to the AfC process again, or would you have some time to take another look? Mathbsnd (talk) 14:52, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Shiji submission by Philbutler

Hi, Nomadicghumakkad, it's me again regarding Draft:Shiji Group and sources. I went back through some of these and found a Skift report by one of the staff analysts that meets all the criteria for notoriety. [1] is an in-depth analysis by the company by one of the industry's leading sources. While Skift does publish paid content, they also do white papers and key research as well. Sean O'Neill is not a contributor and fits in the same category as Forbes or Bloomberg staff writers etc. What do you think about including this as one of the 3 we talked about?

Sorry to be so brief here, I lost a more lengthy reply. Anyway, I am still scouring and looking to find the right references to meet the criteria.

Thanks for all your help.

Philbutler (talk) 15:46, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Philbutler, very happy to see you back! I love it when I see editors returning and participating again. The source looks great in terms of what's written there. I am trying to investigate if Skift is considered a reliable source or not (making an assumption that you are right about Sean O' Neill's affiliation as a staff writer). Seems like the page for Skift was created by a paid editor which ain't a great sign. At the same time, nothing is returning on WP:RS noticeboards [2]. So I think the way ahead to be absolutely sure about this source would be to start a discussion at WP:RS and see what others think. I will do that tomorrow if you'd like. But honestly, going by the content of the source, my gut says this should fly well. Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 15:59, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You are kind Nomadicghumakkad, I appreciate the nod on "trying" even as a semi-retired guy, finding time for everything is pressing. On O'Neil and Skift, I know many of these guys from my time as a journalist writing for various outlets. He used to work for Tnooz and Kevin May, and I know he is highly ethical. That said, Skift does a lot of paid content, as you suggest. This one, if I had to bet, was done as a focus for the industry, which Skift has to do as well. If you would start the discussion, I would so appreciate it. I am learning a lot from all this. It will help me be a better editor for things closer to my heart than corporations. :) Philbutler (talk) 17:08, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Philbutler, I have started the discussion here [3] Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 09:24, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks very much Nomadicghumakkad, it seems like this will be a good discussion for other such situations. I guess every media outlet on Earth can now be considered "paid" one way or another. I think that for us, the issue is to try and identify which reports or information is marketing generated, and which is organic from the standpoint of authentic news or information. Philbutler (talk) 10:30, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

SER Group definition

Nomadicghumakkad Please have a look at the page Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/SER Group and provide me the prompt and accurate response there. I am counting on Your proactive support.Akoszlajda (talk) 17:25, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomadicghumakkad Please have a look at the page Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/SER Group for additional information and update. I see also the other people starts to work on the article. Please let me know if there is something additional what I can do to remove Your remarks on the main page, so we can set up the first base lien of the definition Akoszlajda (talk) 12:35, 1 July 2021 (UTC).[reply]

Nomadicghumakkad Please remove the "for deletion" badge or provide You answer for summary written at Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/SER Group. I hope that additional updates and explanations are enough to finish our discussion as the article seems to provide right now objective point of view about the facts. Thank You in advance for Your cooperation.08:12, 8 July 2021 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Akoszlajda (talk • contribs)

K-Health

Hi, Nomadicghumakkad! I submitted the draft for K Health a few weeks ago after User:Hatchens had cleaned the draft and told me there were no issues of promotional content. Now, I re-submitted the draft again but I’d like to improve it while it is pending review. Can you, please, be specific about promotional content in the draft? I’d appreciate if you detail once reviewing the draft to make it meet Wikipedia standards. Here is the draft for your convenience:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:K_Health Idunnox3 (talk) 01:47, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Idunnox3, thanks for reaching out. There are specific phrases which are problematic like serial entrepreneurs, but the key challenege is that it looks like company profiling and provides no in-depth understanding of the subject. For example, In October 2020, the company formed a partnership with Mayo Clinic through the Mayo Clinic Platform to accelerate the deployment of virtual care models by leveraging large deep data insight This reads like you only want to show that the subject is affiliated with another notable subject and that's all. It should ideally talk more about the role that the company played in it or expand on it; rather than dropping one thing after the other. The overall feel of the article is advertorial. I see previous comments on sources as well, so it might be best to first evaluate WP:THREE and then make more progress. Can you present three best sources here? Quick tip - avoid funding related news for WP:THREE unless it is qualifying WP:CORPIND. Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 03:17, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Nomadicghumakkad! Thank you for your quick response. Here are the three articles, that in my opinion, meet the WP:THREE:

All three articles talk about many things related to K Health and "funding is just one of the aspects - they are not focused on that aspect. Also, all those articles are in-depth coverage of K-Health's development, structure, business model and etc. The publications are US national and fully meet Wikipedia's requirements for the reliable secondary sources.

Also, I believe that K Health easily passes Wikipedia:NCORP for being a national company of the US in all 50 states and also has presence in Mexico and Israel. The publications also indicate it has 4 million patients, which is quite a significant number. Idunnox3 (talk) 01:46, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for Creation July 2021 Backlog Elimination Drive

Hello Nomadicghumakkad:

WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a month long Backlog Drive!
The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running until 31 July 2021.

Barnstars will be given out as awards at the end of the drive.
There is currently a backlog of over 1500 articles, so start reviewing articles. We're looking forward to your help!

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for Creation at 21:54, 7 July 2021 (UTC). If you do not wish to recieve future notification, please remove your name from the mailing list.[reply]

Ali Mozaffari page

Hello dear Nomadicghumakkad. I hope you are doing well. Regarding the page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Ali_Mozaffari The scholar has written 5 books (completely by himself) and tens of articles as book chapters, etc (all by prestigious academic publishers). So I am confused why the reviewers are emphasising that he has been mentioned briefly in 'media'. I will be grateful if you kindly check the page again. Thanks for your time. --Malekfarugh (talk) 20:44, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]