Thank you for protecting the Master film page from vandals. I have created a draft for Gouri G Kishan and was wondering if you could improve the article, so that the draft can become an article. Thank you. --TamilMirchi
Hi there, I was just doing a copy edit on this page, when I noticed that reference № 13 in the lede is titled Mechanisms of disposal of acid and alkali in rabbit duodenum from The American Journal of Physiology. Is some having a joke? 'Drive-by' vandalism? 220ofBorg18:38, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
220 of Borg, Thank you for letting me know. Found the exact edit here. It's weird, considering that user has contributed a lot to the article. I'll change the reference. Regards, SUN EYE 104:18, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
? Fairly newby editor, but it's unnerving it's been there for NINE months! I occasionally came across a page that's been totally screwed up, had page huge amounts of content deleted unnoticed, or just been made 'invisible' by fly-by vandals or 'test' edits. It's surprising what a little 1 or 2 bytes edit can do to a page. I wonder what other 'horrors' are out there waiting to be fixed? 220ofBorg04:44, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
M.G.Ramachandran - I had changed the details regarding the Honorary Doctorate degree based on the "original Certificate/Cittion" received by him. The details given earlier were wrong and Misleading. I am attached the Image files as evidence, this could very well be verified from your end.
The information provided by me is 100% true, the attachments will same the same.
M.G.RAMACHANDRAN - HONORARY DOCTORATE DEGREE WITH THE DATE AND REASON WHY IT WAS GIVEN PLUS BHARAT RATNA AWARD
Hi,
In fact, I am not the copywright owner of those Images but these images are available with most of them in Tamil Nadu, South India. Please make a note of that as well.
Shall very much appreciate if you could make the changes as I had done.
M.G.RAMACHANDRAN HONORARY DOCTORATE DEGREE AND BHARAT RATNA AWARD - EXACT DATE AND REASONS
Morning,
As I said earlier the Certificate itself shows the exact date/year and Reason. If that is not acceptable can I request Wikipedia to show the "reliable media report/link" that Arozona University gave the Honorary Degree for "contribution to Indian Cienma" with the year and date please. Same is the case with University of Madras gave the Honorary Degree for "Contribution to Indian Cinema" in the year 1974 with date and the Indian Government gave Bharat Rathna in 1988 for Contribution to Arts" with year and date!!!
I wanted to correct the incorrect details provided by wikipedia and you want media link for something which happened may be nearly 40 years before. The only way to physically see is to Visit M.G.Ramachandras Memorial House in T./Ngar, Chennai, Madras, Tamil Nadu South India. The other method is to contact Government of India for Bharat Rathna award authenticity and World University and University of Madras for Honorary Doctorate Degree "authenticity" Then you will accept that the details given by me is 100% correct.
Now, I am least concerned if it is corrected or not, I am sure wikipedia is misleading the public by giving such incorrect details.
SAILESHKB, Yes you will have to provide a citation if you are changing something in wikipedia, see WP:WHYCITE. I found sources which says he did receive Honorary doctorates from those universities but they don't mention the date or the reason it was given to him. [1], [2]. You can take this discussion to the article talk page, so other editors can also comment on the issue. Regards, SUN EYE 108:14, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
M.G.RAMACHANDRAN
Morning,
Thanks for your response.
I have posted it in the Talk Section as said by you.
My only concern is correct information has to be given [not with "wrong date" "wrong Year" and "why it was given"].
Hello, Suneye1! I'm Ed6767. I noticed you have been using Twinkle and was wondering if you'd like to beta my new tool called RedWarn, specifically designed to improve your editing experience.
RedWarn is currently in use by over 90 other Wikipedians, and feedback so far has been extremely positive. In fact, in a recent survey of RedWarn users, 90% of users said they would recommend RedWarn to another editor. If you're interested, please see the RedWarn tool page for more information on RedWarn's features and instructions on how to install it. Otherwise, feel free to remove this message from your talk page. If you have any further questions, please ping me or leave a message on my talk page. Your feedback is much appreciated! Ed6767talk!12:53, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Kathmandu is not the city which is known as the city of the temples.
Initial lines of the introductory paragraph of the city Kathmandu in the wikipedia is partially incorrect so I corrected it, and I got the message from you(Suneye1), so i thought of writing back to you. Kathmandu is the capital of the present Nepal that's the truth, but it is not correct that it is the "City of the temples" as well.
Let me explain some part of the history of Nepal in brief. Before the Unification campaign, in Nepal, there were many states, rules by many kings. Kathmandu valley was called "Nepal Mandala". Khwopring(now Bhadgaon/Bhaktapur/Khwopa) was the capital of it. The king of Khwopring divided three major region(i.e, Ye, Yala, and Khwopring) to his three sons to rule as the different kingdoms. And during the unification campaign, Bhadgaon was the last kingdom to be annexed to Gorkha, among the kingdoms in Kathmandu valley. After defeating Bhadgaon the current king of the Gorkha, at that time, declared Kathmandu as the capital and Nepal as the name of his great empire. You might think why was i explaining all these things. When the valley was the single kingdom current Bhadgaon was the capital and the development of the art, culture and infrastructure was centralized there, as compare to the other region of the valley. And as per the location of the one of the first pagoda temple, the Changu Narayan Temple is the oldest temple of Nepal in existence, was build in Pagoda style, by King Mandev of Lichhavi dynasty, and is located in the Changu Narayan municipality, Bhaktapur. And for the name "City of the Temples". I have to document why is it called so, but it is in Nepali. As soon as i finished translating it i'll put it in wikipedia. I'll explain in brief why was it called so. When there was Rana regime in Nepal(especially Kathmandu valley), was a isolated from the foreign tourist. Therefore, normal people from outside were not allowed to visit Nepal, only government officials from certain nations were allowed to do so. Therefore, when the tourism was established as the proper thing in Nepal, english people came to visit here. They saw that the designs of the houses and temples are almost the same, as the houses were equally decorative as the temples. The style of the roof, plinth, wall, windows, etc were almost same. Therefore, Bhaktapur is the city of the temples of Nepal and not the Kathmandu.
In the article Tamils, the first line states, "Tamils (/ˈtæmɪl/), are speakers of the Tamil language and trace their ancestry to the Indian state of Tamil Nadu or Sri Lanka." and the reference is cited as: https://books.google.com/books?id=abNDLZQ6quYC&pg=PA315&dq=tamils+dravidian+ethnic+group&hl=en#v=onepage&q=tamils%20dravidian%20ethnic%20group&f=false. That book does NOT claim that Tamils trace their ancestry to Sri Lanka. It's an incorrect reference. Tamils migrated to Sri Lanka and that is common knowledge. Would you please verify the current reference. I suspect it's poor grammar on the initial author's part. Tamils do live in the northern part of Sri Lanka, but do NOT trace their ancestry from Sri Lanka. It's almost laughable that such an incorrect statement has made it to the first page of the otherwise good Wikipedia page, and has therefore been picked up on the top few lines of Google search and several news articles. In fact, the history of Tamils is listed accurately with sources in the same article. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.182.88.100 (talk) 04:35, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, I can't see all the pages of the book in preview mode and the reference does not provide a page number, so it's better if you open a discussion on the article's talk page, so other editors might also comment. - SUN EYE 115:07, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
ARNAB GOSWAMI PAGE REVERSAL
Hi,
I don't understand why my edits were removed. Arnab Goswami is a respected journalist whose page was littered with biased opinions. I removed the bias, so why remove the edit?
Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Irontigran (talk • contribs) 17:25, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hi,
I am sorry but you seem to be biased as well. It was not 'original research', it was fact. This proves that Wikipedia is full of biased individuals. Good day. It is time this nonsense is exposed to the public. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Irontigran (talk • contribs) 07:29, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
An article you recently created, Sasikanth Senthil, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 05:05, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Page link to Writer Muthulingham
Hi, i had duly hyperlinked the broken link of the famous Writer Muthulingham rightly to his page on tamil. As a legendary writer, its a shame he is not connected despite a page available for him. If this is not constructive, i would love to know the guidelines about it
Hi, there is no article created for the person yet, you can translate the article to English and before linking it here. This is English Wikipedia and you can't hyperlink links from other language wikis here, see H:WIKILINK. SUN EYE 106:28, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
My changes were indeed valid
I had only hyperlinked the lyricist page which was not connected to him with due credit to his achievments. He is a legend and to not have a page for him linked, when available, is a shame. Please do elaborate how did it not appear constructive to be reverted. So i could follow accordingly. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fahamsh (talk • contribs)
An article you recently created, Sasikanth Senthil, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 06:20, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
SUNEYE, concerning Tamil film Veera, I do not have the source regarding the temple, however, since I've seen the movie many times since it's release and knowing that temple, it is indeed the Sri Lakshmi Janardhana Swamy Temple in Dowleswaram, which is a town within Rajahmundry. Go on youtube and look up the temple and compare it with the movie. I bet you 100% that you can verify this with Dir. Suresh Krissna, Rajnikanth and others; that is the temple that over looks the Godavari river. Like I said, look up the temple on youtube and compare it to Veera. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 47.199.68.230 (talk) 00:20, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Rajuiu, Sorry, the subject doesn't seem to be notable, see WP:BIO. Most of the references you've added are not reliable like Facebook, Twitter, Pinterest and WP:MIRROR links. You could wait until the subject gains notability to be on Wikipedia. SUN EYE 114:38, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.
Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.
Thanks for your feedback. I was wondering why it got reversed. I will add citation to the changes. I edited it because it is an error as I know the individuals personally. They are not from IFS but IAS and IPS service. I will add a news reporter to substantiate the changes.
Religious fanatics are taking ownership at Kalaripayattu and not allowing any edits deviating from their agenda. The worst part is it is pending-changes protected and they all are confirmed accounts who can make changes without scrutiny. None of them give proper explanation for reverting, and sometimes blatantly reverts multiple edits (edited with proper edit summary) without explanation. Two of them have COI as evident from their usernames (Kalari). Their main business is promoting their POV and highlighting Hinduism part, though Kalaripayattu do have rituals based on Hinduism, the art itself is not a "Hindu art", it just happened to have originated when only Hindu "religion" was prevalent in Kerala. It is a martial art practised by all religious communities, many of the masters are Muslims, the Christians even have a folk dance derived from Kalaripayattu. Some Hindu extremists are "making statements" by projecting Hinduism on an otherwise communally harmonious martial art. BTW, I am also a Hindu, but this is too much.
The first time my edit got reverted (see history here onward), I never thought it was religious agenda, but now it's becoming clearer, as User:Kalariwarrior changed "Indian mythology" to "Hindu mythology" (source says former), and User:Kalari Poothara's recent Hinduism promotion in lead, and as Outlander07 is now trying to re-insert Hinduism claims (not in the source) in lead which I had removed; he had also removed a sourced mention about a Hindu lower-caste community – Thiyya. There are multiple legends on the creator - Parashurama, Shiva, Agasthya; they want Parashurama, not only that, they don't want to attribute it as "legend" (I agree with [4]). I suspect Outlander07 and Kalariwarrior to be the same person, all three are incompetent in editing. The article requires serious cleanup for sourcing and NPOV. Should I report this activity to WP:ANI, or somewhere else, or what? Please help. 157.44.177.126 (talk) 11:21, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I've started discussion in both the talk pages, reply there. Provide diffs supporting everything that you are accusing me of. SUN EYE 117:32, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I had told you in the first place (even before all these edit war) that to explain your issue in talk page. If you had did that this should not have happened. You already violated WP:4RR and more. Even if you were to revert, you should have been reverting only the specific part, not the whole edit, doing so you also re-insert problematic content and remove constructive edits. This only gives me more reasons to accuse you. 2409:4073:4E8B:3F70:BD4D:AF94:B9C0:D688 (talk) 20:00, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I started both the discussions in the talk page in my first revert. You went on to edit-war without using the talk page and still don't want to discuss it in the talk pages. Provide diffs for that 4RR accusation. SUN EYE 112:32, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
You do know all edits has log history, don't you? I am the one who first told you to discuss the issue at talk page, but you refused and continued edit-warring, you started discussing only after I send you warning notice here. "4RR accusation"? LOL. 157.46.136.122 (talk) 09:00, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, In Alaigal Oivailittai, as "Vagai," the actor is NOT Mahthir Mohamed, the prime Minister of Malaysia -- Mahathir Mohamed is a Malaysian politician, a Malay (not Indian), was not an actor, never acted in any Tamil film, let alone Alaigal Oivathillai. I am not sure if any Mohamed acted there, so I left it as just "Mohamed as Vagai," but rest assured, it was not the Malaysian Prime Minister. Sorry, you made a mistake by reinstating it, after I deleted it. Please do not add Mahathir Mohammed again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.4.100.247 (talk) 03:57, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, I believe this is the edit. You are supposed to provide an edit summary especially if you are removing content. At first glance, it did not look a good-faith edit, that's why I reverted it. I'm not going to restore it anymore since you explained it. It would be better if you could provide sources for that. SUN EYE 111:43, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Suneye1, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2021. Happy editing, Fylindfotberserk (talk) 11:04, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hello there! I am Wikipedia editor SPEcial EDItor 2020 :) I just wanted to clarify a doubt with you, if that is ok :)
In sites Bigg Boss Tamil 1, 2, and 3 Nominations Table , an account 2A01:4C8:A8:1542:894A:AFC6:6E77:7A21 has been changing the fontsize multiple times by adding the code "
" . When I reverted the font size to the normal size, the user left a talk page on my User Account saying that I did not follow the rules and that I would be blocked from Wikipedia if I reverted the edit.
Considering that the original font size before the user's edit was similar to my edit, I feel that I didn't do any mistake in editing the Wikipedia page. Incase if I am wrong, I am extremely sorry for my mistake, and I hope you can forgive me :)
So my question is, which font size is supposed to be correct for the Bigg Boss Nomination Table ?, and if user 2A01:4C8:A8:1542:894A:AFC6:6E77:7A21 is wro g, will he be blocked from Wikipedia ? I need to know the correct font size to prevent any disputes happening in my talk page (User 2A01:4C8:A8:1542:894A:AFC6:6E77:7A21 has already left a talk page before this issue), thank you so much for helping me, and I hope that no more confusions will happen in Wikipedia :) SPEcial EDItor 2020 (talk) 13:25, 26 December 2020 (UTC)
Hi User:SPEcial EDItor 2020, I can't find any difference in the desktop version but it does not look user-friendly in the mobile version, so it is better if the code stays there. You both did not change the font size so you don't need to worry about it. SUN EYE 1 14:59, 26 December 2020 (UTC)
Suneye1, Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Fylindfotberserk (talk) 08:45, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
Abishe (talk) — is wishing you a Happy New Year! It's the last day of 2024 and tomorrow will be 2025. Hope the coming year brings pleasures for you. Have a prosperous, enjoyable and a productive 2025. This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!
Spread the New Year cheer by adding {{subst:New Year 2}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Thank you for the wishes Abishe, Wishing you and your loved ones a wonderful new year ahead.SUN EYE 1 17:45, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
Please help out?
Hello again! It’s been a while, but I was wondering if you could help me out with this.
A while back, you filed a report against an anonymous IP on WP:ANI for WP:GAMING and other issues they were causing on pages such as Silambam and Kalaripayattu. The report to WP:ANI was archived without response, but the same user you accused appears to be involved again.
It seems that he (or more likely, one of the IPs he hops to) has filed a report against me here in WP:ANI, claiming that I am biased, and using Wikipedia to “promote my own views,” when this is not the case.
He seems to have gone through my entire contribution history for the past year or so in order to find diffs to support his accusations, while blowing things way out of proportion so he can gain support for his accusations.
As you have filed a report against this user (if it is indeed the same person) in the past, and have viewed some of my edits in the past, I wanted to ask if you would be able to help out here.
Any help you can provide would be greatly appreciated. Thank you. Kalariwarrior (talk) 22:32, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
Notice of a potential vandal
Just see the discussion between me and another user named Faster edits in my talk page. I think he is a threat to the neutrality of this site and even doesn't shy away to use sexual innuendos in Tamil as a rebuttal to healthy criticism of his edits.
I don't have admin power and hence bringing this to your attention so that you can at least
give stern warning if not outright ban him. Ihaveabandonedmychild (talk) 12:58, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
Bro, I am from the neighborhood village of ponparappi. Since from that neighborhood , I have believed something things strongly, which are only mouth- words like something regarding violences like stone- pelting, exchanging curse words and some fights. Nothing I heard about sexual violence. So that reason , I have firmly asked for the citation for that claim. everyone can be wrong at any point in life. This time it was me. Even the fact that reached my ear is manipulated or something happened. Anyway asking citation is a common thing. That's all bro. Fine ....thums up... Faster edits (talk) 14:47, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
Hey! I suggest you read WP:NOTAFORUM. Also, Try not address other editors as "bro" without their consent. -- KindCowboy69☮ 06:57 AM January 10, 2021 06:57, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
ThankYou!
Thank You for being a good sun!
I came across your contributions and they seem really constructive, So i thought i could show some love <3 -- KindCowboy69☮ 06:46 AM January 10, 2021 06:46, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
I have granted the "rollbacker" permission to your account. After a review of some of your contributions, I believe you can be trusted to use rollback for its intended usage of reverting vandalism, and that you will not abuse it by reverting good-faith edits or to revert-war. For information on rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback and Wikipedia:Rollback feature. If you do not want rollback, contact me and I will remove it. Good luck and thanks. FASTILY 00:19, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
Justify your last edit on Veerappan page.
Why do you think that citation was misleading? The citation clearly stated that Veerappan was revered by Vanniyar community and one of their political leaders had asked them to shun this hero-worshipping. Ihaveabandonedmychild (talk) 05:46, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
Ihaveabandonedmychild, The article says it is the political party hailing him as a hero from the community not the community itself, see WP:OR. SUN EYE 1 06:03, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
Before reverting the edit, check for the grammar.
While you may have rightfully earned certain editing privileges here, you are still obliged to use them in good faith and poise. Your last revert on Byju's page seemed to be impulsive as it completely restored bad phrasing and grammar which the previous edit had corrected. Ihaveabandonedmychild (talk) 06:00, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
Using an undo option or WP:TW is not a privilege, any autoconfirmed user can use it. In the first glance, I saw the unsourced content and did not see grammar errors and it's not my responsibility to clean up every article I patrol. You had corrected it and there is no reason to tell me here. SUN EYE 1 06:16, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
It is not your job to clean up anything either. Nobody is forcing you to do that. If you choose to do it, do it properly and don't undo good efforts of the other user.Make sure, you read it twice before reverting an edit.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Ihaveabandonedmychild (talk • contribs)
It is not a good effort to add unsourced content especially to a WP:BLP. SUN EYE 1 06:53, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
Sikh page
Hello Sir,
I changed the population count of Sikhs with 3 different references including one of the Sikligar, Lohgar and Vanjara Sikh population whom mostly reside outside of Punjab and have little to no connection with Punjab of than the religion they profess to follow. Their population numbers around 100 million. For this I made the change with links provided. It’s because of this I also keep changing the languages spoken by Sikhs as you keep changing the Sikh population to be entirely of a Punjabi background. I would like to know why you keep removing content that has references that provide all this. Pritstick69 (talk) 21:22, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
Hi Pritstick69, I could not find the claim of 140 million Sikh population in either of the three references you provided. Sikh24 is not a reliable source and the references from the Indian Express and Tribuneindia reports the Sikh population as 12-15 crores as estimated by a Sikh organization which is not as reliable as the government census data already present there. SUN EYE 1 13:01, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
A survey released by Democracy Network - Ungal Kural seems unreliable, missing credible sources and did not covered well by media. The newspaper published that poll says the sample size was 80,050, which further increases the doubt on reliability. Another survey done by Puthiya Thalaimurai included only two major parties and even didn't have the "others/don't know" option. So I've removed both of the above mentioned surveys. I request you to clarify about these things to users who may involve in edit war. (A user publicly scolded me as a terrorist for removing that surveys [in edit summary].) Thank you. Selva15469 (talk) 02:15, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
Hi Selva15469, Democracy Network is indeed not a WP:REPUTABLE outlet and I can't even find their website or social media pages. Puthiya Thalaimurai is a WP:NEWSORG and reliable and the unavailable data can be written as "data not available" or something similar. I've warned the user for personal attacks and if they continue you can report them at WP:ANI. SUN EYE 1 05:05, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
Thank you for help. Selva15469 (talk) 05:28, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
Re this edit, the IP's change was actually correct per cited source. It was silently changed by another user in the previous edit. While I understand this could be somewhat counter-intuitive given the page title, it's a good practice to cross-check the cited source just in case. Regards -- Ab207 (talk) 18:04, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Ab207, my bad, and no edit summary makes it look like a unconstructive edit on the first glance. Thanks for correcting it. SUN EYE 1 18:11, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
No worries. I like your username and the yellow theme by the way -- Ab207 (talk) 18:15, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Thanks, Appreciate your contributions. SUN EYE 1 18:21, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Likewise! -- Ab207 (talk) 18:35, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
ILLAYA RAJA AND HIS CASTE
Wikipedia is read by world wide. No body knows except Indians about the caste. It is not necessary to include his caste, which will degrade illaiyaraja as well as India. So, I deleted it. Hope you will understood it.
220 of Borg 18:38, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
220 of Borg 04:44, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
Thank you - SUN EYE 1 17:47, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Adimurai. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. For repeatedly adding unsourced content and subjective promotional attributions such as "regarded as one of the oldest and most important martial art", violating WP:NPOV, and for creating MOS:HEADCAPS issues. 157.44.163.5 (talk) 17:30, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
.jpg)
