Jump to content

User talk:Timwikisidemen

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Fayenatic london (talk | contribs) at 13:04, 15 July 2021 (→KSI categories: message about full nomination). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Your GA nomination of Down Like That

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Down Like That you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 10:01, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Down Like That

The article Down Like That you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Down Like That for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 10:01, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Down Like That

The article Down Like That you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Down Like That for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 13:02, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Nathan Dawe - Lighter (Acoustic).jpeg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Nathan Dawe - Lighter (Acoustic).jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:40, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Poppin (KSI song)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Poppin (KSI song) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 20:01, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Poppin (KSI song)

The article Poppin (KSI song) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Poppin (KSI song) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 10:01, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Poppin (KSI song)

The article Poppin (KSI song) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Poppin (KSI song) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 10:22, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:KSI - Wake Up Call (Yoshi Remix).jpeg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:KSI - Wake Up Call (Yoshi Remix).jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:41, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

January 2021

Stop icon

Your recent editing history at KSI discography shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. 331dot (talk) 11:13, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Mally Mall

Hello, Timwikisidemen. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Mally Mall".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 04:05, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Lighter (Nathan Dawe song)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Lighter (Nathan Dawe song) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 10:01, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Lighter (Nathan Dawe song)

The article Lighter (Nathan Dawe song) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Lighter (Nathan Dawe song) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 18:01, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Lighter (Nathan Dawe song)

The article Lighter (Nathan Dawe song) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Lighter (Nathan Dawe song) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 21:02, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Wake Up Call (KSI song)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Wake Up Call (KSI song) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 06:21, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Wake Up Call (KSI song)

The article Wake Up Call (KSI song) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Wake Up Call (KSI song) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 09:41, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Do you plan on getting the remainder of this article, specifically the addition of a new opening section, done soon? --K. Peake 17:21, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hi :Kyle Peake, I've added some info to form a background section. There's not much info online about the production of the song. So this will have to do. Thanks.--Timwikisidemen 18:03, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The section is decent, you just need to go over the rest of the suggested changes. --K. Peake 18:05, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Wake Up Call (KSI song)

The article Wake Up Call (KSI song) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Wake Up Call (KSI song) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 19:02, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:KSI - Domain.ogg

Thanks for uploading File:KSI - Domain.ogg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 16:46, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

February 2021

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, you may be blocked from editing.

Information icon Please remember to assume good faith when dealing with other editors. Thank you.

Information icon Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you.

Please be civil and follow the basic pillars of Wikipedia with regards using reliable sources to verify the content you add, engaging with other editors and not assuming bad faith (or simply accusing other editors of vandalism when they make edits to an article which you disagree with). Happy to discuss and assist with improving the articles you are interested in, but you must be civil. —Ave (talk) 16:44, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Don't Play Silver

"Don't Play" is not listed at the website https://www.bpi.co.uk/brit-certified/ as having been certified Silver. Where did you see that it reached Silver? Binksternet (talk) 16:31, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Binksternet on the BRIT Certified twitter page. 17:05, 6 March 2021 {UTC)
Okay, I see it. Here's how to cite it.
@BRITs (March 5, 2021). "'Don't Play', the mega-bop from @AnneMarie, @KSI and @DigiFarmAnimals is now #BRITcertified Silver!" (Tweet) – via Twitter.
Cheers! Binksternet (talk) 17:31, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jump Around (EP), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Arjun.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:26, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:KSI Jump Around Cover.jpeg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:KSI Jump Around Cover.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:40, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Do not remove maintenance templates unless you fix the problem

Just so you know, you can be blocked for repeatedly removing maintenance templates from articles that address issues on those articles without a good reason. You didn't explain why you removed the refimprove template. Even with the commercial performance section I started, the "Patience" article has only two sources on it. It needs more to prove it is worthy in terms of notability (WP:NSONGS), so that is why I started the commercial performance section—to show it is in contention for a place on a national chart. Without charting information, the article has no claim to really being an article at this stage. UK midweek chart information, if it is clearly addressed as such, is valid and you have no good reason for removing it. We're not placing it in a "Charts" section and trying to pass it off as the final chart information, which would justify removal. I have told you this before, but your micro-management of every KSI article is getting to be too much. If you were so worried, you would have expanded the "Patience" article tenfold by now, but instead you try to remove any improvement I make. Good going. Ss112 13:12, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Also, File:KSI - Patience.jpeg is oversized, an inferior-quality JPG (PNG is the preferred file format for digitally created images; the "Patience" cover is not a photographic image, which a JPG would suit, so you might want to upload PNGs in future) and has been tagged for deletion. Ss112 13:14, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry Ss112. I didn't realise that I had removed that template. I shouldn't have done that. I was in the process of adding artwork as well so there were intermediate edits. Apologies again -- Timwikisidemen 13:18, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
A good thing to remember in that case is to place {{in use}} at the very top of an article while you are actively editing it, and then removing it when you're done. Ss112 13:21, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Really Love (KSI song)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Really Love (KSI song) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Lee Vilenski -- Lee Vilenski (talk) 15:21, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Really Love (KSI song)

The article Really Love (KSI song) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Really Love (KSI song) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Lee Vilenski -- Lee Vilenski (talk) 17:01, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Really Love (KSI song)

The article Really Love (KSI song) you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Really Love (KSI song) for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Lee Vilenski -- Lee Vilenski (talk) 12:41, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Renaming of Categories.

Wikipedia:Categories for discussion is your friend. --Richhoncho (talk) 14:08, 3 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Bypassing CFD[1] is considered "out of process" and is liable to be considered disruptive when done by experienced editors.
Two reasons for using CFD: (i) benefits of experience and multiple perspectives; (ii) the heavy lifting gets done by a bot.
It also makes sure that the category page is moved, not just copied and pasted, so that anyone can see the history of the category. – Fayenatic London 08:12, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion templates.

Never, ever remove discussion templates, unless you want a trip to WP:ANI. --Richhoncho (talk) 14:20, 3 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not empty the category or remove this notice while the discussion is in progress.

The above is what is written on the template, pay attention. --Richhoncho (talk) 14:32, 3 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:KSI albums

A tag has been placed on Category:KSI albums requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 13:27, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Timwikisidemen,
As the message states, please do not remove a speedy deletion tag from any page that you have created that has been tagged. If an empty category is tagged for CSD C1 deletion and is no longer empty, another editor will see this and remove the tag. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 22:11, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:KSI albums

A tag has been placed on Category:KSI albums requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 14:04, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Smokepurpp

FYI, if you are going to create navigational box templates, such as you did with Template:Smokepurpp, you need to add the template to the articles that are listed in the navbox or otherwise it is not very useful. You only added it to Poppin (KSI song). StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 16:18, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:List of songs written by Smokepurpp

Information icon Hello, Timwikisidemen. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of songs written by Smokepurpp, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:01, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

KSI articles

Hi. When you start articles, please include news sources to establish notability. It doesn't matter if it's a song by an established artist or not. You must provide evidence that it is deserving of an article per WP:NSONGS. When you started Holiday (KSI song), the only sources on it were Tidal and YouTube, which are primary sources (see WP:PRIMARY) and do not establish nor prove notability for the song. While yes, KSI's name on a track is basically guaranteed to make it a charting song in at least the UK, to editors/patrollers who don't know or care who KSI is they would only see Tidal and YouTube as sources on your article and redirect it, as they have done in the past. This is why you need to establish notability with independent news sources from the get go. Thanks. Ss112 09:54, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Swerve (Jay1 song)

Notice

The article Swerve (Jay1 song) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication that this is a notable song per WP:NSONG or WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ... discospinster talk 16:11, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

KSI categories

You haven't nominated any of the KSI categories (such as Category:KSI (entertainer) albums and Category:KSI (entertainer) songs) properly. Please follow the instructions at WP:CFD#HOWTO. Thanks. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 17:12, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Do you need help to do a full nomination as opposed to using the Speedy page? – Fayenatic London 13:04, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Timwikisidemen&oldid=1033726707"