Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2007 January 26

< January 25	January 27 >

Replaced by {{NHL Team}}, only difference is size of logo px. — MrDolomite | Talk 05:23, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - over infobox-ification. NHL Team does fine. 64.178.98.65 15:51, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Obsolete. Xiner (talk, email) 16:26, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think the text is pretty self explanatory. "This article does not express a biocentric view". -Amark moo! 04:16, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Question. I don't understand. Is the text of a template not supposed to be self-explanatory? —Ruakh_TALK 06:07, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- I think Amarkov's trying to imply that a biocentric view is not necessarily a good thing in articles. --ais523 13:19, 26 January 2007 (U T C)
Delete Amarkov has a point - it's not that biocentric POV is a bad thing, it's that, well, an encyclopedia written by humans, for humans, might, um, represent a human POV. Besides, notice, it's unused. 64.178.98.65 15:52, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Single use redirect of Infobox city.. MJCdetroit 03:14, 26 January 2007 (UTC) --MJCdetroit 03:12, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - the idea behind it was to cut back on coding at the actual Dallas, Texas article.. where it is transcluded. I know that isn't common practice.. but it isn't strictly a "redirect," it's a double transclusion. drumguy8800 C T 03:15, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Cutting down on coding is not a valid reason for single use templates. If you think it should be, discuss it at Wikipedia talk:Template namespace, but as the policy stands, they're not allowed. -Amark moo! 03:31, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Single use redirect of Infobox city. --MJCdetroit 03:04, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Where do these single use templates come from? -Amark moo! 03:06, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]