Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jonathan Ægidius

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Daniel (talk) 22:31, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Jonathan Ægidius

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't seem to pass WP:GNG. Fails WP:NFOOTY as, while he has played a senior cup game for a team in a fully-pro league, it was against a team in a non-fully pro league (Danish 2nd division). I would draftify for now as the article is in a good shape. Nehme₁₄₉₉ 15:22, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Nehme₁₄₉₉ 15:22, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Nehme₁₄₉₉ 15:22, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Denmark-related deletion discussions. Nehme₁₄₉₉ 15:22, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Nehme₁₄₉₉ 15:23, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - fails GNG and NFOOTBALL. Giant Snowman 15:44, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - Hi Nehme, I would like to argue, that he's been the starting Danish goalie on all international youth teams, and is currently hailed as one of the brightest Danish talents. Verdenskrig (talk) 15:49, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- @Verdenskrig: I did try to find sources on the subject but failed to find anything substantial. As you seem to have knowledge on Danish football, can you find any significant articles on Ægidius in the Danish media? Alvaldi (talk) 15:55, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- (e/c) @Verdenskrig: It still isn't enough, yet. Can you find a few articles that talk in-depth about him (his life, his career, etc.)? Nehme₁₄₉₉ 15:57, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Fails WP:GNG due to lack of significant coverage. The best I could find was this and it does not go into the subject in any deep detail. And on a further note, WP:NFOOTY does not supersede WP:GNG so if he happens to appear in a game where every player got paid he won't magically turn notable. Passing WP:NFOOTY only means that the subject supposedly is likely to have the significant coverage to pass WP:GNG but he still has to pass it, although anyone following the AfD's on these one-game wonders knows that is far from the case. Alvaldi (talk) 15:50, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Are these any good? https://www.tipsbladet.dk/nyhed/superliga/var-jagtet-af-bif-og-fck-derfor-blev-det-broendby, https://www.bold.dk/fodbold/nyheder/broendby-koeber-lyngby-talent-med-det-samme/, https://www.bt.dk/superligaen/bt-afsloerer-fc-koebenhavn-og-broendby-kaemper-om-guldfugl-i-lyngby Robby.is.on (talk) 07:54, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Those sources just cover his transfer to Brøndby and don't really go into the subject in any depth. They are also all from january/february 2021, a relatively short period of time, so that wouldn't pass WP:SUSTAINED. Alvaldi (talk) 11:17, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, seems to fail NFOOTY but pass GNG.--Ortizesp (talk) 15:03, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - significant coverage is where the subject is addressed directly and in detail and there is no evidence of this for this geezer. No objection to this being moved over to someone's user space or to draft space. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 16:29, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 21:47, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, per lack of SIGCOV. JoelleJay (talk) 23:18, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.