Talk:Spermatocele

Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Spermatocele.

PubMed provides review articles from the past five years (limit to free review articles)
The TRIP database provides clinical publications about evidence-based medicine.
Other potential sources include: Centre for Reviews and Dissemination and CDC

Medicine: Pathology Start‑class Mid‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Pathology task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 29 June 2020 and 21 August 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): S. Chu Future UCSF PharmD, AHassani, PharmD Cand, J. fong, future UCSF PharmD, R. Diaz, Future UCSF PharmD (article contribs). This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 7 June 2021 and 27 August 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Tang Thao, TMendoza11, TNgo22, T.Truong.UCSF (article contribs). Peer reviewers: M. Salarilak, Future UCSF PharmD.

Foundations II 2020 Group 27 proposed edits

This article was lacking in overall information as well as citations to back up many statements. We will be adding citations to the "General", "Causes", "Diagnosis", and "Treatment" sections as well as expanding on the current information using a variety of reliable resources. A few statements in the article seemed too brief so we will also be expanding on them to ensure the information fits in the context of the article. Some of the original wording was not very clear upon first read so we will be going through and making sure the content is as clear and as understandable as possible for the reader. S. Chu Future UCSF PharmD (talk) 21:30, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with Article

I really don't think this is a good article and for a number of reasons. It had pictures (which did not work, so I removed them), the wording is poor, too brief, and fails to consult any sources. It could definitely be improved by someone with more medical knowledge then myself.Smooth0707 07:05, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Torbiel najądrza.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 18:38, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]