User talk:Magitroopa

Welcome to my talk page!

• Please use the Reply button to reply to a message, or add topic (+) to start a new section.
• If I have left a message on your talk page, please DO NOT post a reply here, instead, reply there.
  • Mention me using the "Mention a user" button in the Reply box or type out {{ping|Magitroopa}}.
  • I will have your talk page on watch and will note when you have replied.
• If you prefer to manually edit the page to post:
  • Use an accurate and appropriate heading.
  • Indent your comment by using an appropriate number of colons ':'.
  • Sign your post with four tildes (~~~~) at the end.

Masked Singer Season 2 Poster

Hi I’m Sentai 01, and the reason I wanted to put on a poster for masked singer season2 was because masked singer season1 page has one. But I understand I had trouble from keeping it from deleted but maybe you or someone else can upload it. User:Sentai01 (talk) 1:01 9 November 2019 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2603:9004:50C:F03A:BD2B:C903:1413:1744 (talk)

Corn & Peg edits

Hello. How was anything that I did vandalism??? The show isn't an American co-production, its produced by ONLY Nelvana. The show has no adventure elements to it. The episode page split totally makes sense as the page would become too cluttered with it. Nothing of which I did was vandalism. CrypticalFiery (talk)

That Girl Lay Lay (TV series)

Hi! I just wanted to let you know that on March 18, 2021 Nickelodeon officially greenlit That Girl Lay Lay (actual title and confirmed title) for a 13 half-hour episode first season. I think an article needs to be created for this show. It needs to be added to upcoming on Nickelodeon original programming table. It is created by David A. Arnold and John D. Beck, Ron Hart, Carolyn Newman, and Will Packer serve as executive producers. The first episode is titled “Out the App” and it is written by David A. Arnold and directed by Wendy Faraone. I know IMDb is not really a reliable source but they have more official info about the show. Its set to premiere in June 2021. Just a heads up! :)

Just click on the link to see the official logo for the show. (Yes, this is the confirmed logo as I have spoken with David himself)

NickALive! -That Girl Lay Lay

Tyler Perry's Young Dylan

I've already deleted the episode from my DVR, but where in the credits is that? Because I looked. Amaury • 23:21, 26 May 2021 (UTC)

@Amaury: Been awhile since I watched episodes of it, but I definitely remember seeing this episode, and he would surely be considered a guest star for the episode. I may potentially have the original airing of it saved somewhere (possibly not, I'll check later tonight) but not entirely sure what the credits were when originally aired. Either way, this is coming from what is currently on the Nickelodeon website here (video link of the beginning of credits as well). Also not sure if it should be listed 'Khaled "DJ Khaled" Khaled' as shown in the credits or just 'DJ Khaled' like previously. Magitroopa (talk) 23:28, 26 May 2021 (UTC)

Did you ever get the chance to check this for "Street Smart"? Also, for "Speechless" is Phillips correct? I know IMDb is WP:NOTRS, but it's showing Phillipe. I'm pretty sure I saw Phillips, but figured I'd double check. Amaury • 16:24, 27 June 2021 (UTC)

@Amaury: I don't believe I do have the original airing of "Street Smart" (I had recorded some episodes of shows I watch through Spectrum Live TV on my computer, mainly specials- I did record all nightly premieres from around August 1, 2020 - September 26, 2020), so like I said above, the full episode on Nickelodeon's website credits him as Guest Appearance by Khaled "DJ Khaled" Khaled (image). Full episode of "Speechless" says "Phillipe" David Shae (image). Magitroopa (talk) 17:40, 27 June 2021 (UTC)

I didn't even think of checking the Nickelodeon site. Thanks. It's possible I may have just missed that in my recording. which had the generic Nickelodeon credits, which I find dumb. I wish all series would keep their original ending credits for their TV premieres, but no, gotta have more commercials. lol Amaury • 17:51, 27 June 2021 (UTC)

It's Pony

Is nick.com (the official website of Nickelodeon) for you a reliable source?

Here you can see the episodetitles and airdates for the 2 shorts from May 28, 2021

https://www.nick.com/video/p2tzo7/it-s-pony-coffee-run https://www.nick.com/video/dhhf8r/it-s-pony-paper-chase

• The Nickelodeon website is WP:OR. BaldiBasicsFan (talk) 02:00, 1 June 2021 (UTC)

101 Dalmatian Street

@Magitroopa Please improve this article for me, multiple issues of it have been listed as found by Butlerblog. BaldiBasicsFan (talk) 01:41, 1 June 2021 (UTC)

MasterChef infobox format

I don't know what your objection really is to having the infobox be in a standardized format to the other seasons. Not only is the style I edited used in all seasons of MasterChef, but every season of multiple other cooking competition shows including MasterChef Junior and Hell's Kitchen (American TV series). Please understand, I am honestly trying to make the articles better by maintaining uniformity. You stated in your edit summary that someone should go back and edit the previous seasons instead, do you plan on doing this to all of these shows? Please don't take this the wrong way but you seem to be very determined to have the edits be done your way or no one else's. - SanAnMan (talk) 18:06, 4 June 2021 (UTC)

@SanAnMan: Not right away, but I do plan on cleaning up the main/season articles (for HK, MC, and MCJ). There's some other stuff I'm wanting to get cleaned up as well (for example, Whose Line Is It Anyway? episode tables- essentially paramters are being used completely incorrectly). But yes, I plan on getting to the article, hoping sooner than later. Even just looking at episode summaries alone for something like the Hell's Kitchen season articles, there's lots of MOS:NUMERAL cleanup needed.

And I know I've reverted a bit over on the S11 article- first off, whether I mention it's a goodfaith revert in my edit summary or not, I definitely do not mean any ill-will or anything similar. Second, ideally yes, if it's season articles for the same show, they should follow the same formatting, but I do plan on cleaning up the other season articles as I've mentioned. And definitely, anything going contra-MOS should not be carried over to each season article, even if all of them do the same (just as a quick example, the opening lead of S1-10 articles all start off with "Season #" rather than spelling it out like the S11 article. That will definitely need to be fixed in the other articles, another NUMERAL case. Also some MOS:BOLDAVOID stuff in the leads.).

Also not sure if you saw this, but I left a new response at Talk:MasterChef (American TV series)#Series overview cleanup a few days ago- just an FYI. Magitroopa (talk) 21:53, 4 June 2021 (UTC)

"Fishy" usernames

Re this report: I have blocked him indefinitely over that username, on the grounds that it's one of the few that are inherently disruptive. In the future make reports on suspect usernames (if that's the only issue) to WP:UAA. Daniel Case (talk) 20:37, 6 June 2021 (UTC)

Deletion tag was a mistake

That deletion tag was actually a mistake, I meant to redirect the article. Now I wanna ask you kindly to please leave me alone so I can redirect it. 2600:1000:B077:4F9D:D41D:305C:3A11:2640 (talk) 04:57, 7 June 2021 (UTC)

Yet this isn't your sole discretion/decision to just remove the article in its entirety or even where to redirect it to. A discussion needs to actually take place, now please stop. Magitroopa (talk) 04:59, 7 June 2021 (UTC)

Hi Magitroopa. The IP was wrong for edit warring, but there was nothing wrong with them removing their post from WT:AFD the first time; editors are allowed to remove their talk page posts per WP:REDACT as long as nobody has replied to them and not too much time has passed. Your re-adding of the post was really not warranted in this case. The AFD template the IP added to the article was also most likely a mistake and the IP can remove that as well since no corresponding AFD existed and the IP wasn't going to create one. Even the IP's bold redirect was OK，in principle, but it was just as OK for you to revert the redirect and request discussion. At that point everything went off the rails and the edit warring by the IP over the redirect was completely unacceptable. The IP actually did need to start an AFD if they wanted the article redirected so as to see if there was a consensus to do so. The article is now protected, and my guess is that the IP will be likely be back in a few days; if the edit warring starts up again, you should probably just go straight to AN3 and avoid filling up the page's history with back-and-forth reverts. -- Marchjuly (talk) 05:53, 7 June 2021 (UTC)

Apology

Hey Magitroopa, I owe you an apology. I sincerely apologize for edit warring against you on those articles, Marchjuly is right, I know edit warring is wrong and it’s not the right way to solve this problem. I apologize ignoring your edit summaries on to follow the deletion policy, but not that you two started a discussion about the Michael E. Rodgers article, I will follow what you two say. Again, I take back what I said in my edit summaries about you, I didn’t physically mean it. The was just a little annoying that no one wasn’t listening to me on what I have to say about my edits. But now, since you started a discussion, I will follow it for now on. 2600:1000:B075:1662:1567:AF67:CF5:399C (talk) 14:51, 7 June 2021 (UTC)

New Ratings Source

Hey @Magitroopa: Since Showbuzz Daily is no longer providing ratings, which website should people start sourcing for TV Ratings? kpgamingz (rant me) 18:42, 7 June 2021 (UTC)

References

kpgamingz (rant me) 18:42, 7 June 2021 (UTC)

@Kp2016rockin: I don't believe there's been any sort of 'decision' as of yet, but it's difficult since there's only a select few 'good' sources at the moment... I'd just keep up with Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Television#U.S. TV ratings sources for now and discuss there. It's been evident this was going to come sooner or later, but still sad with it now being official. (P.S.- your message was actually how I initially saw their latest update, so thank you for that.) Magitroopa (talk) 19:25, 7 June 2021 (UTC)

We Baby Bears

Hey, Magitroopa! Any chance improving Draft:We Baby Bears and adding better sources for it? Bye! – ChannelSpider (talk) 15:26, 9 June 2021 (UTC)

Barnstar!

		The Original Barnstar
		Thank you for all your contributions to Wikipedia! From: DinosaurTrexXX33 (talk) 20:18, 9 June 2021 (UTC)

Vioalessia/89.47.52.89

I've blocked the Vioalessia (talk · contribs) account indefinite as an abusive sockpuppet of Lilithceusan (talk · contribs), who has created a number of socks. Also, I've blocked the IP 89.47.52.89 (talk · contribs) for six months as the IP is clearly the same person. If you see this sort of editing crop up again under other accounts, feel free to report it to WP:AIV as a long term abuse situation, noting the master account and its various sockpuppets. This person has been at it for months now, and likely won't stop any time soon. --Hammersoft (talk) 16:03, 14 June 2021 (UTC)

@Hammersoft: Agh- thanks... I knew the IP was disruptive in the past (after just quickly looking at their edit history), but had completely forgotten about Lilithceusan. I had a report at AIV ready to go, but probably would've straight-away reported if I had remembered about the previous account. Thanks again though. Magitroopa (talk) 16:27, 14 June 2021 (UTC)

Total DramaRama

Hello, i'm DinosaurTrexXX33. I am sorry for the edits to Total Dramarama. I would like to ask you for permission to re-add the part that says that the show is Canadian-American. Please respond, and I try to do my best at editing. Regards, DinosaurTrexXX33 (talk) 17:29, 15 June 2021 (UTC)

@DinosaurTrexXX33: I reverted that edit per MOS:TVLEAD- "A series's nationality (country of origin) should be referenced by reliable sources, directly if possible, but otherwise by referencing the country or collaboration within which principal creative control was exercised. If singularly defined, it should be identified in the opening sentence. If the nationality is not singular or cannot be supported by appropriate citation, omit the information from the introductory sentence and cover the different national interests later, where these can reliably be referenced."

Essentially, if something is just American or just Canadian, then it would be fine to include the nationality there. However, if it is multiple, something such as 'American-Canadian' or 'British-American' is incorrect. Hope that helps. Magitroopa (talk) 17:37, 15 June 2021 (UTC)

@Magitroopa: Thank you so much for helping me! The latest thing i've learned so far is WP:OVERLINK. Signed,DinosaurTrexXX33 (talk) 17:39, 15 June 2021 (UTC)

Middlemost Post

Not sure what can be done here, but the air dates in the episodes table do not match the newly announced premiere date in the lede. Not sure if/when Futon Critic will update to reflect that... --IJBall (contribs • talk) 22:28, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

@IJBall: On mobile atm, will try to explain best that I can- it's basically due to it being part of 'Nick Shorts Showcase'. Per the listings on Futon, I believe first two (5/28 + 6/4) were It's Pony shorts, 6/11 was Middlemost, and based upon the descriptions listed in TV guides, tonight + next week (6/18 + 6/25) are also Middlemost. Since the show is premiering in July (per press release and other articles), these are just being considered as shorts, not the actual 'series premiere' itself. The "Challenges" and "Unboxing" shorts can be viewed here, and credits for "Unboxing" are included here. (And then listings for actual episodes starting in July will be listed here whenever that updates for next month.) Magitroopa (talk) 22:53, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

OK. Interesting. These details probably need to be added to the article somehow then, either in the 'Production' section, a 'Broadcast/Release' section, or in the 'Shorts' section. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 22:56, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

Hell's Kitchen Plot Summaries

Movieking 134, What is wrong with the plot summaries? All of the other plot summaries never from previous seasons never had any problems? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Movieking134 (talk • contribs) 19:10, 22 June 2021 (UTC)

Per MOS:TVPLOT- they are extremely long and as the guideline states, "Individual season articles should use [either] episode tables with no more than 200 words per episode..." It seems that Heartfox has started trimming down parts of other articles as well, that are either too fancrufty or are BLP violations (and unsourced). These episode summaries should not be a scene-by-scene retelling of everything that happened in an episode. I fully agree with the trimming and I'm sure some of the other seasons definitely need it as well. Magitroopa (talk) 19:22, 22 June 2021 (UTC)

There's nothing wrong with plot summaries, it's just that all of the Hell's Kitchen articles go way over the recommended limit of 200 words. It's probably because the MOS about plot length came about later than the first plot summary, and subsequent seasons followed the same style, but it's wrong and we don't have to continue following it. It's very clearly not meeting the MOS—it's not supposed to have scene-by-scene breakdowns but the second episode of season 20 listed the dish and points earned of every contestant in the first challenge. That's crazy detailed and not appropriate for an encyclopedia article! I have still kept the celebrity guests, Ramsay's quote, etc. but listing every time someone messed up is not the purpose of the article. I won't have time to go back and trim every season as I only started watching with season 12, but others are free to. Heartfox (talk) 19:31, 22 June 2021 (UTC)

Yes, great explanation (especially in regards to anything I may have missed or gotten wrong). And FTR, the season articles had previously been in worse shape before I had removed a section (on each season article) dedicated literally to just describing the opening sequence (such as this and this). Probably one of the most trivial/unnecessary things I've seen in a TV series article on Wikipedia. Magitroopa (talk) 19:46, 22 June 2021 (UTC)

The Futon Critic

Is not a reliable source for production codes because most of the codes come from network press releases which use network codes, not the codes the producing studio uses. In the case of iCarly they are differently not the production codes. Xeditboy (talk) 04:11, 23 June 2021 (UTC)

@Xeditboy: Yet it is certainly reliable, especially for WP:TV (even listed as a reliable source at Wikipedia:WikiProject Television/FAQ#Reliable sources). I had previously contacted another editor regarding a similar matter of someone claiming it is not reliable for production codes, which I have figured out was you as an IP. As they stated in response to me, "...using TFC meets WP:V, and that's all that matters..."

Your logic is especially flawed in regards to the iCarly revival when the source you provided for the episode 4 title also says, "104 - iGotYourBack", as well as photo captions supporting the other titles/production codes. It is indeed correct. As I have previously said, TFC doesn't just 'randomly' get these from somewhere- the network provided them to them (in this case, Nickelodeon/Viacom). The production codes are certainly correct and verified, and just removing them based on your personal opinion that the production codes are not reliable is not the way to go about it. Magitroopa (talk) 04:21, 23 June 2021 (UTC)

The 104 is the provider's numbering used in the their press releases, not the studio's production code. Take a look at the CBS provided show All Rise on futon which was produced by Warners which use a T13.22xxx production code but futon lists the CBS version of the code. Also the codes are not needed any way as they all seem to be released in production order. Xeditboy (talk) 04:44, 23 June 2021 (UTC)

@Xeditboy: I suggest you see the latest at Talk:ICarly (2021 TV series)#The Futon Critic (and continue the discussion there, lol)- Unless you have/provide a reliable source that says otherwise, we go by the production codes listed on TFC, especially considering the end credits do not contain any production codes for this particular show. Magitroopa (talk) 04:51, 23 June 2021 (UTC)

Hunter Street (TV series), etc.

Could really use you here. We've got edit warring from User:Lado85 who refuses to most of this correctly. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 14:18, 24 June 2021 (UTC)

That Girl Lay Lay (TV series)

Hi! I just wanted to let you know that on March 18, 2021 Nickelodeon officially greenlit That Girl Lay Lay (actual title and confirmed title) for a 13 half-hour episode first season. I think an article needs to be created for this show. It needs to be added to upcoming on Nickelodeon original programming table. It is created by David A. Arnold. Arnold, John D. Beck, Ron Hart, Carolyn Newman, and Will Packer serve as executive producers. It is set to premiere in Fall 2021. Check FutonCritic for evidence of greenlight. If you could please reach out to me, that would be great! :)

Deadline - That Girl Lay Lay

Deadline - That Girl Lay Lay Main Cast — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stanisagoodman (talk • contribs) 23:19, 2 July 2021 (UTC)

List of Salute Your Shorts episodes

I would like your opinion on recent edits here. Please take a look. If warranted, please follow up at the Talk page. Thanks. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 01:37, 4 July 2021 (UTC)

Ollie's Pack

I edited the Ollie's Pack because the series was cancelled. Do you think it wasn't cancelled?

From Kálló Gergő

Tagging pages for deletion

Hello, Magitroopa,

Please do not tag pages for speedy deletion until an editor is confirmed to be the sockpuppet of a blocked editor. Being reported at SPI is not confirmation of being a sockpuppet and there is no urgency to delete pages immediately.

Also, any time you tag a page for deletion (CSD, PROD, AFD/MFD/CFD/etc.), please post a notification on the talk page of the page creator. If you use Twinkle and set up your Preferences to "Notify page creator", Twinkle will post these notices for you which makes things easy. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:57, 7 July 2021 (UTC)

List of Salute Your Shorts episodes

Internet Archive has all the Salute Your Shorts episodes (rips of the bootleg DVD set that's been floating around for 20 years), and I went through yesterday and checked all the director/writing/executive producer credits for every episode - everything I've updated is 100% correct. Airdates for season 1 are going to be hard to come by, as every newspaper listing I've come across for the first season didn't list episode titles or descriptions. Only thing that *might* have the titles/descriptions would be actual TV Guides from 1991, and there's not many of those scanned online that I can find. I'll keep digging! TheNewMinistry (talk) 05:44, 8 July 2021 (UTC)

Hell's Kitchen Aaron's Passing and JR's Disqualification

I have proof that JR was originally a contestant. If you look closely in S3E3 during the coat hanging, JR's coat hang is next to Joanna's. I also have proof that Aaron passed away. Here's a link to his obituary: [1] 2025McDJ (talk) 16:27, 11 July 2021 (UTC)

Nickelodeon Episode Ordering

You keep saying how airdate order is the correct order, but that's not the case for every show, Nick does things differently, the home video releases for SpongeBob can further prove that the airing order is not the correct episode ordering.

And the production codes? You can very much go to futoncritic's page for The Simpsons (http://www.thefutoncritic.com/showatch/simpsons/listings/) it lists the show abbreviation, then the Season number and episode number as a code. But no, that's not the production code, just the packaged season order, or, airing order, while that does go back to airing order arguments, it's not the production code. You can check any simpsons episode's end credit to see the ACTUAL code, same for any other fox animated series.

You can see SpongeBob's production codes on production material, but that's not the proper ordering, the proper ordering is correct on wikipedia, all except for how Birthday Blowout's under 'specials' instead of 244-245, which is the correct episode number.

"A Place for Pets", a Season 13 packaged episode, the production code is not "268a", no that's the actual episode number, the code is "325-1252". The Patrick Star Show, The Loud House, all those nick shows in airing order, is incorrect because that's not the way Nick packages these things. "Lockdown for Love" also proves this production code "268b" is not the production code but the episode number with production material revealing the actual code it was produced under.

So while the airing order argument may work for some things, it doesn't work for any Nick show and you can see this with how the episode orders are in the correct formats on Wikia/Fandom and the home video season sets.

I do want to talk this out with you but it's difficult when you're confusing episode numbers for production codes, it's confusing but the episodes are produced out of order then packaged together by the executive producers and that's why they're ordered like that. With the airing order thing you're doing here it results in a hugely inaccurate number and order for these shows. The Loud House doesnt have 200+ episodes, it has around 119. The whole production code thing on futoncritic is false and those are just episode/season number orderings because Nick airs out of order. - OL.Wise.Editor (talk) 20:43, 14 July 2021 (UTC)

@OL.Wise.Editor: Most of what you said has already been answered on your talk page- "The Futon Critic production codes are not real/correct" is all answered here, and a simple screenshot of supposed 'production material' certainly can't be used to source information. You also seem to be completely ignoring WP:OSE- as I've already said, what other articles do doesn't necessarily mean it is correct or should be carried over to other articles. We go by production codes Nickelodeon provided through TFC as production codes are not included in Nickelodeon's end credits. Again, I suggest you see Talk:ICarly (2021 TV series)#The Futon Critic for more detailed responses in regards to this.

Also of note- "you can see this with how the episode orders are in the correct formats on Wikia/Fandom"- A fan-run Wiki certainly does not dictate that how something is done on Wikipedia is incorrect. They are not run by the same people and different guidelines are in place for each. We are not going to change things based on how a Wikia/Fandom site is believed to be 'correct'.

Lastly, let's just say a discussion takes place at WP:TV (or wherever) and it's ultimately decided that the SpongeBob episodes can stay ordered the way they are due to DVD releases. Again, with OSE in mind, this does not mean this automatically carries over to Kamp Koral: SpongeBob's Under Years and The Patrick Star Show (unless that is decided to be the case within the same discussion), especially considering those to shows do not have DVD releases (at least right now). Magitroopa (talk) 20:58, 14 July 2021 (UTC)

Kamp Koral's in the correct order because they released it in the packaging order on paramount+, it's different for Nick-airing shows because it tends to be out of order and you can see where Nick did this with the 2nd Kamp Koral episode aired 1st. Also yes the image is spotty but here's the video it came from, Nick's official twitch page with the Animatic Editor, Estrella Capin revealing the code at 19:30 - https://m.twitch.tv/videos/1034868146 - Here's a better screenshot with timeframe - https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/696633695364186162/810926864373252176/unknown.png - Also the fans are able to implement the correct episode orders instead of forcing order by airdate which is not the correct order for any Nickelodeon show. - OL.Wise.Editor (talk) 21:13, 14 July 2021 (UTC)

@OL.Wise.Editor: Again- you can see Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Television/Archive 12#Preferred Order of Episodes for a discussion regarding the ordering of episodes. We are not going to change the ordering based on what fans believe to be 'correct'- Wikia/Fandom is WP:NOTRS for a reason, and it's because it is user-generated content that can be changed by anyone. And even if one production code for one episode (segment) was shown in some livestream, we certainly do not having sourcing for the rest of a massive amount of episodes. We aren't going to change it based on one production code that has been seen somewhere and removed everything else. Production codes are not included in the end credits, so we go by what Nickelodeon provided to The Futon Critic. Magitroopa (talk) 21:20, 14 July 2021 (UTC)

It's not what we "believe to be correct" it's the literal order of how they're packaged. Wikipedia isn't 100% correct on these things, and at this point i'm giving up on trying to make sure it's accurate episode number wise. You are partly a reason i hesitate to continue editing on here. - OL.Wise.Editor (talk) 21:38, 14 July 2021 (UTC)

And I've explained multiple times above why it is done the way it is. It shouldn't be difficult to understand. We go by reliable sources, not just any website/link we are able to find in our research. The Futon Critic and Zap2it are the main sources we use for these episode tables, and we're not going to simply change it to go against said sources. Sure, feel free to decide in your own mind that how it's done is wrong, but there are past discussions that took place that helped decide how these should be formatted, and the current way is following past discussions. A big change like you are attempting to would likely require consensus on it, not just a, "I think it's wrong so I'm changing it." Magitroopa (talk) 21:48, 14 July 2021 (UTC)

It's not thinking it's knowing and you're berating me as if I was some sort of crazy person and I don't appreciate that. - OL.Wise.Editor (talk) 21:52, 14 July 2021 (UTC)

If that's how you believe I am treating you, then I do apologize. However, I'm simply trying to explain to you why it's done the way it is. You are more than welcome to discuss over at WP:TV why you believe TFC isn't a reliable source, but I highly doubt it'll go far. Magitroopa (talk) 22:04, 14 July 2021 (UTC)

All i'll say before i'm done here is that, Futoncritic provides episode numbers/proper order numbers but not production codes, for Nick shows you'll have to go to the crew via twitter about codes and a friend of mine has gathered a bunch of season 12 production codes. It's still very spotty and I don't advise ordering them by those though but by the numbers Futon lists. I want to make sure these lists are as accurate as possible and not in an incorrect numbering or order. - OL.Wise.Editor (talk) 22:11, 14 July 2021 (UTC)

The Casagrandes Nicktoons aired episode

I don’t really know if this is real about a casagrandes episode airing on nicktoons when a show go’s on nicktoons nick kills it fast idk if nick aired it by accident or there actually killing the loud house spin off? Nickelodeonfan178 (talk) 20:26, 23 July 2021 (UTC)

Just listing that the episode aired (even if by accident) on the channel does not mean anything in regards to 'nickelodeon killed it'. It literally just means it aired on the channel. Magitroopa (talk) 20:39, 23 July 2021 (UTC)

Magitroopia k got it :) Nickelodeonfan178 (talk) 20:44, 23 July 2021 (UTC)

Edit-warring block

I have blocked you from editing the article The Casagrandes for 72 hours, for edit-warring. You are certainly aware of the policy on edit-warring, as you have yourself more than once referred to edit-warring, and have received a short-term block for doing so in the past. JBW (talk) 20:49, 23 July 2021 (UTC)

Lego Masters

Episode 7 of Lego Masters Season 2 already aired in New Zealand. As such, I know for certain that Maria and Phillip are the next team eliminated. If the issue was spoiling an episode that hadn't aired yet, I apologize, but the edit was not wrong.

Winner: Dave & Richard Second: Caleb & Jacob Risk: Bryan & Lauren Eliminated: Maria & Philip