Talk:Marth (Fire Emblem)
Marth (Fire Emblem) was a Video games good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | ||||||||||
|
Semi-protected edit request on 23 July 2021
It is requested that an edit be made to the semi-protected article at Marth (Fire Emblem). (edit · history · last · links · protection log)
This template must be followed by a complete and specific description of the request, that is, specify what text should be removed and a verbatim copy of the text that should replace it. "Please change X" is not acceptable and will be rejected; the request must be of the form "please change X to Y".
The edit may be made by any autoconfirmed user. Remember to change the |
Add on Reception section "Jeremy Parish of Polygon ranked 73 fighters from Super Smash Bros. Ultimate "from garbage to glorious", placing Marth at 24th, describing him "The most legendary of Smash’s Fire Emblem heroes."[1] Gavin Jasper of Den of Geek ranked Marth as 15th on his list of Super Smash Bros. Ultimate characters, stating "The Fire Emblem hero may not be the most charismatic fighter on the roster, but his backstory, unwavering moral compass, and ability to rally soldiers for the greater good makes him deserving of his legacy."[2] 14.192.212.176 (talk) 23:16, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
- ^ Parish, Jeremy (2018-12-03). "We rank the Smash Bros. (and friends)". Polygon. Retrieved 2020-11-05.
- ^ https://www.denofgeek.com/games/super-smash-bros-characters-ranked/
- Former good article nominees
- C-Class video game articles
- Low-importance video game articles
- C-Class Nintendo articles
- Nintendo task force articles
- WikiProject Video games articles
- C-Class fictional character articles
- WikiProject Fictional characters articles
- Wikipedia semi-protected edit requests
- Wikipedia edit requests possibly using incorrect templates