Talk:Sharmagne Leland-St. John
Appearance
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
Comment
Nothing in this article appears to be verifiable. There are no external sources.
Mmorningstar45 (talk) 20:23, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
- The interviews check out, and so do the ISBNs. DS (talk) 17:29, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
Yes, ISBNs, but the information is unreliable. And clearly written by the subject; ie, "At this point in her life she realized she had always been either the bosses daughter, the bosses girlfriend, or the bosses wife. Finally she was THE BOSS! After this epiphany..."70.110.197.252 (talk) 08:04, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
- Agreed. While that sentence is gone, this article needs MAJOR clean-up from start to finish. It's not even about missing sources--it's about not coming close to standard Wikipedia style. The entry reads like a bio from an author's personal website--this should probably contain a third of the details. I also question the relevance of the bibliography length--even very well-known prolific writers on Wikipedia don't always list every single published piece--most are selected bibliographies. Even if they're full, you won't see one like this, where every single poem published is listed. I think it needs to be shortened to just complete poem collections to look legit; it would actually increase the sense of credibility that I imagine the poet would want the entry to have (e.g. the "An Eternity of Bliss" listing sounds like the title of one of those thinly-veiled vanity press anthologies--even if that isn't the case). It would be great if the original contributors could check out the basic style guide and do more work on this. Efrafra (talk) 10:12, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
Questions
I just inserted a "confusing" tag because it's not clear who the text is referring to as step-mother and and as wife.
Also, I'd appreciate it if somebody would explain why she's in category:Mestizo writers - in fact, she's the only person listed there!
Categories:
- Biography articles of living people
- All unassessed articles
- C-Class biography articles
- C-Class biography (arts and entertainment) articles
- Low-importance biography (arts and entertainment) articles
- Arts and entertainment work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- C-Class Indigenous peoples of the Americas articles
- Low-importance Indigenous peoples of the Americas articles
- Indigenous peoples of the Americas articles
- C-Class Women writers articles
- Mid-importance Women writers articles
- WikiProject Women articles
- WikiProject Women writers articles
- C-Class Poetry articles
- Unknown-importance Poetry articles
- WikiProject Poetry articles