Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeff Wolverton
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 11:30, 6 August 2021 (Fixed Lint errors in signatures. (Task 2)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 11:30, 6 August 2021 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors in signatures. (Task 2))
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. --Luigi30 (Taλk) 12:37, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Jeff Wolverton (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Prodded with a concern of lack of notability and conflict of interest but I thought it would be better off here instead. No vote. See also Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2006 December 24. Hut 8.5 20:07, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete unless someone can provide verifiable sources of meeting WP:BIO. I cannot find significant news coverage, indications of awards, etc. Cheers, :) Dlohcierekim 21:44, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete this non-notable person from the 'pedia. Google throws up nothing to indicate he's done anything to warrant his inclusion. Liquidfinale (Ţ) (Ç) (Ŵ) 07:15, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as the person does not meet notability requirements. From what I can tell, the main contributor, which is him, is really making prominent the smaller items he's done. —Erik (talk • contrib) - 12:26, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per others. Non-notable. Doctorfluffy 22:56, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per the others. Burntsauce 18:16, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.