User talk:Ch.AhmedRaza23

Welcome!

Hello, Ch.AhmedRaza23, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Welson Paints, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at the our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

Article development
Standard layout
Lead section
The perfect article
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions ask me on my talk page or you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! 2A01:4C8:A1:F08E:59BB:DC5E:5B97:3F40 (talk) 08:44, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Best of Luck

God bless you.

Need for a neutral point of view

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. JBW (talk) 09:35, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I'll try my best. Ch.AhmedRaza23 (talk) 20:04, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Removel of 5 paragpraphs of Moonis Elahi

Hello Ahmed Raza, you have recently deleted 5 paragraphs of Moonis Elahi, your deletion is not justified. The allegation of "Promotional Content" is also not true. He is a member of parliament and all the information in these paragraphs is related and directly linked to him and absolutely not the promotional content. I request you to revert your edit. If you need any other information/clarification please write me back. Thanks. User:Sheharyarahmad1 (talk) 26 August 2021

Copy and paste moves

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Choudhry Rahmat Ali a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Chuhdary Rahmat Ali. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. 2A01:4C8:A1:F08E:BD9A:CCD7:C7BA:DDA6 (talk) 19:16, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Okay I'll move it, instead of copy paste Ch.AhmedRaza23 (talk) 19:26, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ahmed Raza

Please do not move this page unnecessarily. ... discospinster _talk 17:31, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Its not unnecessary, its Disambiguation Page. Ch.AhmedRaza23 (talk) 20:45, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Its my humble Request, kindly understand it. Its Disambiguation Page, means its name should be Ahmed Raza (Disambiguation). If you still didn't understand, I can do nothing. Stay Blessed. :) Ch.AhmedRaza23 (talk) 20:49, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not all disambiguation pages have (disambiguation) in the title. ... discospinster _talk 21:45, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Okay you win, I lose..... BYE🙂 I am leaving Wikipedia, its ****, kindly block my account. Ch.AhmedRaza23 (talk) 16:14, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

August 2021

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Chuhdary. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Notfrompedro (talk) 20:11, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Ch.AhmedRaza23

A tag has been placed on User:Ch.AhmedRaza23 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Notfrompedro (talk) 20:14, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Chuhdary

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Chuhdary. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Chowdhury. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Chowdhury. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Notfrompedro (talk) 20:16, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Nufayl Ibn. Abdul Azza

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Nufayl Ibn. Abdul Azza requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. dudhhr_Contribs 17:35, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Nufayl Ibn. Abdul Azza

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Nufayl Ibn. Abdul Azza requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Taking Out The Trash (talk) 18:06, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Multiple accounts

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 18:49, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Multiple Accounts?? Ch.AhmedRaza23 (talk) 18:53, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, you are using AReditorPK to interchangeably with this account completely contrary to our policies regarding multiple accounts, especially when you use the sock account to remove speedy deletion tags from articles you created.-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 19:00, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ch.AhmedRaza23 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was just creating a page of a real person, same page already created in URDU and ARABIC languages, but I am blocked, kindly unblock me Ch.AhmedRaza23 (talk) 18:57, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You are blocked for abusing multiple accounts. In your next unblock request, you should address this reason. PhilKnight (talk) 19:25, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

As you created these pages as translation of other languages, 《《 François Abadie (September 27, 2010) (translation from fr.wikipedia.org) Annick Alane (September 28, 2010) (translation from fr.wikipedia.org) Maurice Bambier (October 5, 2010) (translation from fr.wikipedia.org) Bohdan Ihor Antonych (October 13, 2010) (recreated existing article from scratch) Donald Leifert (October 26, 2010) (recreated existing article from scratch) Colette Renard (November 4, 2010) (translation from fr.wikipedia.org) Jean Boffety (January 24, 2010) (translation from fr.wikipedia.org) Luc-Marie Bayle (December 13, 2011) (translation from fr.wikipedia.org) 》》 I created a page translated from [Urdu] and Arabic. Named Nufayl Ibn. Abdul Azza, father of Khattab Ibn. Nufayl, you can check both on WikiData too. Ch.AhmedRaza23 (talk) 19:06, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

None of which has anything whatsoever to do with the block on your account.-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 19:10, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah I'm blocked because my edits were also done by other account named User:AReditorPK, but the reason behind edits was this. That I and User:AReditorPK created a page, translation of [[1]], you can check this Urdu Page's [WikiData] too. Ch.AhmedRaza23 (talk) 19:14, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

CLARIFYING ABOUT AN ACCOUNT IDENTIFIED AS MY SOCKPUPPET.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Ch.AhmedRaza23 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The userpage/useraccount named AReditorPK doesn't belongs to me. Any edits made by mentioned account have no connection with me. Whether the Administration block that account or whatever they feel good.

Accept reason:

Confirmed innocent. Block removed on this account indefinitely. Yamla (talk) 10:28, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks alot! I was just saying that I am not responsible of other Accounts except two including this & TanzoMazakh. You can block all other accounts on my IP address except these.

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Ch.AhmedRaza23 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am requesting last time

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I am requesting last time |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I am requesting last time |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I am requesting last time |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

If you still don't remove my blockage then it will proved that Wikipedia isn't an open encyclopedia, it's all about will of Administrators.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Ch.AhmedRaza23 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am requesting last time

Accept reason:

Confirmed innocent. Block removed on this account indefinitely. User (Talk) 11:22, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]